Texas Lawyer Harassed At Home By Federal Agents, Fired By His Employer After He Tells His Story
from the bullies-and-cowards dept
Radley Balko’s post on Substack details an ordeal, however brief, Texas appellate lawyer Clayton Jackson suffered through recently. A longer one possibly awaits, thanks to his employer firing him shortly after he went public with his recounting of this unwanted interaction.
Balko’s opening paragraph explains why the Trump Administration has hit law firms and universities with punitive executive orders. It explains why it’s blocking certain news agencies from attending press conferences and threatening others with further punishment for daring to report the facts. It’s why Trump has weaponized every aspect of the federal government to go after anyone who dares to criticize him or repudiate his claims. These are not the acts of a president. These are the acts of an aspiring despot. Here’s how that’s working out right now:
One of the more pernicious effects of authoritarianism is to make the everyday participation in civic life we take for granted feel subversive. The goal isn’t to police all behavior at all times. It’s to make us fearful to the point that we police our own behavior.
And that’s where Clay Jackson comes in. While at a local gas station, he was approached by an employee who asked if he might be able to give a little legal advice to an immigrant family. The family’s father had recently been detained in an ICE workplace raid and the gas station attendant wondered if Jackson might be able to help.
It turns out he could, even if it was out of his area of expertise, something that was further complicated by the language barrier. But Jackson did what he could.
Later that afternoon, March 4, Jackson visited the family in their home. “It was a little difficult to communicate because everything had to be translated through the 10-year-old kid.” He met with them for less than an hour and told them their rights if they’re detained by ICE. “I said I’d help find them pro bono counsel who specialized in immigration.”
Simple enough, even if it probably wasn’t enough (and what could possibly be under this government?). No good deed goes unpunished, not in this bizarre iteration of the Land of the Free.
“A couple days later, on March 6, I was working from home at around 11:30 when I got a notice that my VPN had gone down,” he says. “I didn’t think much about it. It can cut out from time to time. About 10 minutes later, I got a knock at the door.”
Two men were outside Jackson’s door, dressed in slacks and polos. They were not wearing badges.
“I first thought they were going to try to sell me something. But as soon as I opened the door they said, ‘Are you Clayton Jackson?’ I think I shook my head or said ‘yeah,’ and then I heard, ‘We have information that you are obstructing an ongoing immigration investigation.’”
Cool cool cool. Officers refusing to identify themselves or wearing anything clearly identifying their law enforcement agency just rolling on up on someone’s house to insinuate that they probably broke a federal law. Fortunately, Jackson is a lawyer. He demanded identification. They refused to provide it. They asked to come inside. He refused. And 15 minutes after they left, his WiFi suddenly started functioning again. But because it was out during this unwanted interaction, it wasn’t captured by his Ring devices.
Whether or not the internet outage and the arrival of officers at Jackson’s door was just a coincidence is a mental exercise best left to the reader. It can mean whatever you want it to mean, but there’s nothing about this story that rings false. And it certainly serves no purpose for Clay Jackson to simply make this whole thing up, especially since it has now cost him his job. And that makes his comments to Balko in his post extremely (and unfortunately) prescient:
Jackson isn’t an immigration attorney, but he occasionally represents undocumented people in non-immigration matters. He is using his real name, but he asked that I not name his employer or describe the type of law he practices.
“I thought, shit, now I’m going to have to get my employer involved. I’m going to have retain my own attorney. And now I have to worry about my clients. If they’re investigating me, are they going to start looking into my clients, too?”
And, as careful as he was discussing this with Radley Balko, it still somehow wasn’t enough. It would be extremely interesting to see if his employer experienced a similar visit from, um… unmarked officers? (Is that the correct term?) Balko reached out to every law enforcement agency that might have been involved in this visit (ICE, local cops, the state police, etc.) and, of course, has received no responses. But there’s not much comfort to be taken from even the best-case scenario:
Clay Jackson hasn’t heard anything more from the two officers who visited him, nor has he heard from whatever agency that employs them. It seems likely that his initial hunch was correct — this incident wasn’t the product of a top-down conspiracy to intimidate lawyers. It’s more likely that two cops were pissed off that someone had the audacity to help a scared and powerless family.
Not when the outcome is losing your job and realizing that intimidation tactics — no matter how clumsily they’re deployed — still work. And when one side has all the power, even those who know the law and their rights are equally capable of getting fucked.
If there’s anything we can all agree with, it’s Jackson’s take on the current political climate in his state — a statement that applies to this entire nation at this point in time:
“[C]an I just be honest with you? I’m fucking scared to be in Texas right now.”
Filed Under: clayton jackson, dhs, donald trump, immigration, mass deportations, police intimidation, radley balko


Comments on “Texas Lawyer Harassed At Home By Federal Agents, Fired By His Employer After He Tells His Story”
So who are the nazi murderers that fired him?
Unmarked Officers
Perhaps we should take a page out of their book, and call them Illegal Officers.
Re:
With Officers like these, who needs criminals?
What is it law enforcement is fond of saying? If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear?
The word you’re looking for is plain clothes officers. They’re the cops who wear casual clothing.
Re:
Even plain clothes officers are required to carry their badge.
If they were undercover officers they shouldn’t be presenting themselves as officers to civilians unless they desire to blow their cover.
Re: Re:
…including immigrants of whatever stripe. Ya know?
Re:
Plain-clothes officers still have to identify themselves.
Re:
No, I think “secret” would work better here. Secret Officers investigating Secret Crimes for the Secret Poli- oh wait.
Re:
If they refuse to identify themselves or their employer why should they be described as any kind of officer?
Re: Re:
They are “Fuck Off, ICErs”.
Scared to be in the US now.
That could be a big reason why tourists from the EU are dropping the USA as potential holiday destination. There are so many countries in the world that are more friendly to tourists.
So what? these two jerks just happen to own the jamming equipment, and other tech needed to take out his home internet[0]?
At BEST that could mean that what ever special ops tech the police have (why do they even have that…) is available for “personal” use, with basically no oversight.
[0] Theoretically just it could be coincidence. But we would all be bat shit crazy, and stupid beyond believe to actually believe that, without, you know, very compelling evidence.
This comment stupidly denial-of-serviced by a webserver that erroneously hands out 429 errors
and that’s rich coming from the same shitstains that violate people’s rights regularly, then hide behind a twisted interpretation of “Qualified Immunity”.
What else would anyone expect from Orange Monkey the Mad King and his cabal of dollar store Nazis.
Must be the Thought Police, they’ve started wandering here and there and listen to every Wifi connections.
Don’t worry Clayton, it’s for you own good, to ensure we’re living safe and free from any dangerous thought.
But still, you may watch your tongue for the next four years.
Re:
Cheap Trick’s “Dream Police” might need to be updated now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_Police_(song)
...and you voted for this?
I don’t get why any nation would vote to have this kind of stuff happen on their doorstep. I guess I’m far too naive for this world.
Re:
In the US, as long as it’s happening to brown people or those who would help them, there are plenty of folks who are not on OK with this but who support it.
Re: Re:
— Lyndon B. Johnson, 36th President of the United States
Re:
Less than a quarter of the United States population cast their vote for this. Always remember that.
Re: Re:
And even less than that less than a quarter voted against it. Maybe that’s what you need to be remembering right now.
Re: Re: Re:
Not technically true. Using numbers rounded to the nearest million: 156 million people voted in the 2024 election, and Trump won 77 million of those votes, which means 79 million votes went to Trump’s opponents (75 million to Kamala Harris and around 4 million to varied third party candidates). That Trump won the popular vote is a tragedy, but he still didn’t win an actual majority (i.e., at least 50.1%) of the vote.
Of course, our electoral system is pretty fucked anyway thanks to no ranked choice voting in federal elections and the Electoral College, so the total popular vote technically doesn’t matter. Trump winning both the popular and electoral votes is something of an anomaly for the past few Republican wins in the national election (including Trump’s first victory).
Re: 'Let it all burn' meets 'If I can't have everything I want I refuse to try'
Hatred and spite really carried the last US election, from those that wanted suffering(but only when it’s not theirs of course) to those that decided that a presidential election where one candidate was openly declaring his intent to be a dictator was the perfect time to throw a tantrum that would embarrass a toddler, with said tantrum taking the form of either refusing to vote or voting third-party.
Re: Re: But then . . .
voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for someone who is evil.
As in so many things, there is a big difference between principle and expediency. Often, adhering to one’s principles is much more difficult than taking the more expedient route.
Re: Re: Re:
“You think you’re better than everyone else, but there you stand: the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles into blood-stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns. You were a coward to your last whimper.”
Re: Re: Re:
Every presidential election is a referendum on exactly how much evil someone is willing to put up with. 79 million people saw Trump and decided “nah, that ain’t it, chief”. The only catch is that some of those 79 million people didn’t vote in the right places (or for the right candidate) to prevent his electoral victory. And that’s not counting the people who might’ve voted for Kamala but didn’t because they were too upset about one issue or another and went “nah, fuck all of this”.
Re: Re: Re:
The choices were never two evils. That’s kind of the problem. There was always this bullshit false dichotomy that Harris and Trump were somehow equal sides of the same coin and that could never have been further from the truth.
Re: Re: Re: Grow up or get used to accepting the blame for your refusal to participate
If you’re not willing to vote because one of the candidates isn’t a flawless paragon that perfectly matches what you want in office then sit down, shut up, and get used to the adults doing the thinking for you, because you will never get what you want.
Re: Re: Re: Re;Re;
The problem is that in adhering to “your” black and white principles in voting means that you’ve inflicted “your” principles on everyone else. And honey I sure as fuck don’t appreciate being on the receiving end of “your” principles. If someone is bleeding out do you stand there and weigh the bandages for their moral qualities? Because that was what this election was about. And now thanks to principles we’re left with this. Democracy is bleeding out in front of us and some of the crowd is standing around bitching about moral bandages. Slap one on and then lecture about evils and morals later. Because let me tell you a dead person or a democracy can’t hear your moralizing.
Re:
Fascism is appealing to subhuman waste because it tells them they don’t need to make any attempt to better themselves, they can just blame someone else.
Nietzsche called them “men of resentment.”
'Advising our victims of their rights is obstructing justice!'
Ah yes, because any conversation that starts with an attempt to make sure you can’t contact anyone is certainly going to be an honest and civil one…
This is why you need wired cameras with local storage
Re:
And on-site backup power. Cutting phone/cable/power lines isn’t that hard for a threat agent with a particular interest in you.
That is a dammed good reason
Do NOT use Wi-Fi for everything, if the cameras had been wired they would have still recorded. Wi-Fi can be hacked and disabled too easily!
Remember kids, every day is shut the fuck up Friday.
Two men were outside Jackson’s door, dressed in slacks and polos. They were not wearing badges.
No, they got that wrong.
They should have been wearing long leather trench coats and sinister black fedoras
Re:
Give it 6 months.
I love your writing style, Tim Cushing. Nice work!
How does he know for sure they were federal agents? Being a lawyer, it could be any number of things.