Gavin Newsom Makes An Ass Of Himself On Antitrust, Paramount Merger

from the what-the-hell-are-you-doing,-dumbass dept

It’s hard to not have noticed that a key enabler of U.S. authoritarianism was our consolidated corporate media, which (with scattered exception) was more than happy to throw the entirety of journalistic integrity in the toilet for a chance to please a mad, idiot king. In large part because our press is increasingly owned by a handful of rich, white, old, right wing men keen on tax cuts and deregulation.

It’s very hard to also ignore that if we’re going to avoid more Donald Trumps, the country is in desperate need of media reform. Greater antitrust enforcement, the restoration of media consolidation limits, media ownership diversity requirements, improved media literacy standards (see: Finland), the restoration of U.S. public media, a refusal to amplify or validate the trolling of racist opportunists, and creative new funding models for real journalism are all essential.

Unfortunately Democrats and Republicans alike pay a lot of empty lip service to this sort of stuff, before immediately doing whatever makes our biggest corporations happy.

Case in point: California Governor Gavin Newsom for some reason thought it would be a good idea to try and quietly pressure California (and 11 other states) to drop their antitrust lawsuit against Paramount and David Ellison’s $111 billion merger with Warner Brothers.

Why? According to the Wall Street Journal (non-paywalled archive link) Newsom is trying to argue that blocking the unpopular deal will somehow harm California employment:

“In recent weeks, Newsom has told people involved in the matter that if the deal is blocked as a result of the suit, state employment would suffer, the people said. Newsom’s office has encouraged Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office, which has independent authority to file such suits, to find a resolution out of court, the people said.”

That’s simply not a fact-based claim. There are 100 years of very hard evidence showing that media consolidation repeatedly results in massive layoffs and higher prices for consumers. It’s simply not a debate. Warner Brothers, in particular, has a quarter century of hard evidence showing that every deal the company has been involved with ends in mass layoffs, higher prices, and shittier overall product.

We literally just went through this very thing with the AT&T/Discovery/DirecTV/Warner Bros mergers, which resulted in 50,000 people losing their jobs (this stark human tally is, curiously, memory holed when it comes to most corporate press coverage of the latest round of mergers).

California and eleven other states filed an antitrust lawsuit to block Paramount’s latest merger last month, correctly pointing out that the high debt load of the deal will result in significantly more layoffs for an already reeling U.S. entertainment industry. The courts have agreed to delays, which has justifiably worried Paramount given looming ticking fees ($7 million daily paid to investors starting in October) and Ellison’s/Oracle’s precarious financial footing on AI.

So the company is applying pressure wherever they can, and has found a helpful ear in folks like Gavin Newsom, Ari Emanuel, and James Cameron. The fact that Newsom is doing this behind closed doors and refuses to own the position or publicly comment to the press indicates he knows just how unpopular it is.

Newsom has no direct authority to pressure the AG on the deal, but it does shine a light on the kind of media policies you can expect under a Gavin Newsom presidency. Newsom has already found himself under fire for repeatedly hosting assorted white supremacists and right wing propagandists on his podcast, demonstrating a lack of modern media understanding and a tendency toward rank opportunism.

Newsom isn’t alone in being terrible when it comes to U.S. media policy. Democrats have historically spent the last quarter century tripping over their own asses when it comes to meaningful media reform policies, and the impact has not been subtle.

As a result, Republicans increasingly dominate everything from AM radio and local broadcast news, to Twitter and whatever’s left of cable news. Larry Ellison actively supports fascism; and he’s very clearly hoovering up outlets like CBS and CNN with an eye on making already saggy U.S. journalism much worse. Placating Larry Ellison doesn’t create jobs; it creates more fascism.

There is no bridging with or debating fascism. There’s no conversation to be had with it. It’s something that’s either destroyed or left to metastasize. A cornerstone of right wing U.S. authoritarianism has been extremely racist propaganda seeded across a feckless consolidated corporate media. Presidential hopefuls keen on dislodging fascism from the body politic — and avoiding a repeat with a younger, smarter version of Trump — shouldn’t be making the problem worse.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , , ,
Companies: paramount, warner bros.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Gavin Newsom Makes An Ass Of Himself On Antitrust, Paramount Merger”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
28 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

It’s hard to not have noticed that a key enabler of U.S. authoritarianism was our consolidated corporate media

Mainstream Media is overwhelmingly left wing and open propagandists for democrats. They routinely coordinate with them, in fact.

California Governor Gavin Newsom for some reason thought it would be a good idea to try and quietly pressure California (and 11 other states)

These states have no standing to stop the merger. It’s just a delaying tactic. And the ONLY reason you oppose it is because Paramount is slightly less blue-hair commie than netflix.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: To a cult anything less than slavish adoration is unacceptable

Depends on how you look at it, if for example you’re one of his cultists then any ‘news’ outlet that isn’t 24/7 nothing but positive and completely uncritical puff pieces of Trump and his regime is wildly left-leaning and part of and evidence for the existence of ‘The Democrat Propaganda Machine‘.

Bloof (profile) says:

Re:

CBS is owned by the Ellisons, as is paramount, Warner Brothers is currently owned by libertarian John Malone and CNN are sliding to the right to prep for the takeover. Fox is owned by the Murdoch family and has bought into streaming platforms since Disney bought their film library. The Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, as are Amazon Prime and MGM, most local TV Stations are owned by right wing groups like Sinclair who put out ‘must air’ pro Trump propaganda segments. Cable networks are subsidising Fox News by making all customers pay for it as part of their basic package, and helped create alternatives even further to the right to curry favour with republican lawmakers. NBC are corporate democrat at best, which is center right by the standards of anywhere else in the world and puts out a steady stream of pro cop dramas, with MSNow no further to the left, no matter how the far right try to paint Rachel Maddow as chairman Mao. The NYT spent the past two decades chasing the Murdoch owned NY post’s audience, bringing shitheads like Bari Weiss and Ross Douchehat into the mainstream, and publishing fascist screeds by the likes of Tom Cotton. Netflix is owned by Sillicon Valley libertarians who lean towards fascism, the B-C tier streamers are owned by investment vehicles from hostile regimes and/or the previously mentioned right wing billionaires. Twitter is now owned entirely by Elon and used as his personal soapbox… But Disney show queer people kissing every now and again, before erasing it to appease the right, and a trans person got a beer can once, so everything lis left wing and woke.

Bloof (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Traditional libertarianism? Sure. American libertariwnism? Not even close. Murray Rothbard bragged about stealing the term from the left, killing it and wearing it’s skin, hell, everyone who was waving gadsen flags under Obama dove to the ground to let Trump tread on them so they can tread on others in return.

Look at libertarians like Rand Paul and Alex Jones, then tell me they’re the opposite of fascist.

A Guy says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Well, Alex Jones distrusts and dislikes the government and doesn’t want the government to tell him what to do. I imagine especially now that he has a billion dollar defamation verdict against him. There may be a little anarchism mixed in with his libertarianism. Libertarian also doesn’t necessarily mean wise. Fascism advocates for total state control of public and private life and subservience to the state, historically with low human rights protections.

Rand Paul gets dragged along by his party and doesn’t really get his agenda passed, but I don’t agree with his Fauci obsession/grandstanding.

Obama is a lot more libertarian than Trump. Biden is not usually a libertarian but is also more libertarian than Trump. There are right wing, (right-left) centrist, and left wing libertarians.

Netflix’s business model relies on state enforced monopolies but replaced a less libertarian system with something closer to what people want. It’s more libertarian than the old studios system it replaced but it’s pretty (fascist-libertarian) centrist overall.

Candescence (profile) says:

Thankfully Newsom’s career in politics is likely to die with his governorship. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the Democrat party base is sick and tired of corporate bootlickers, and the only thing he has going for him is being an attack dog towards Trump. Any run at the presidency is going to crash and burn in the 2028 primaries, especially if 2026 candidates like Abdul El-Sayed win in the general this year. Pritzker and AOC would run rings around him.

But yeah, not surprised that he’s doing something like this on the down-low. It’s unlikely to do anything, considering 11 other states are involved and aren’t interested in backing down.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

That One Guy (profile) says:

The only people who benefit from mergers are the execs

“In recent weeks, Newsom has told people involved in the matter that if the deal is blocked as a result of the suit, state employment would suffer, the people said. Newsom’s office has encouraged Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office, which has independent authority to file such suits, to find a resolution out of court, the people said.”

Ah yes, because as history shows time and time again nothing keeps more people employed quite like mergers.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...