DOJ Files A Truth Social Post As A Legal Brief — Which Admits To Sharing Top Secret Plans With A ‘Fake’ Organization
from the what-the-fuck-is-this-i-don't-even dept
There have been plenty of absolutely batshit crazy legal filings from Trump and his crew over the last few years, but a filing last night takes the crazy to new levels. This is in the case filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation against the National Park Service over the ballroom Donald Trump is trying to build (and for which he already tore down the East Wing of the White House despite earlier promises that it wouldn’t even touch the existing building). It absolutely reads like a typical Donald Trump Truth Social post more than any legal filing you’ll ever see:
“The National Trust for Historic Preservation” is a beautiful name, but even their name is FAKE because when they add the words “in the United States” to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not. In fact, the United States refused to continue funding it in 2005 because they strongly disagreed with their mission and objectives. They are very bad for our Country. They stop many projects that are worthy, and hurt many others. In this case, they are trying to stop one that is vital to our National Security, and the Safety of all Presidents of the United States, both current and future, their families, staff, and Cabinet members. They were asked by the United States Military not to bring this suit because of the Top Secret nature of the important facility being built. They were shown detailed plans and specifications of this knitted, unified, and cohesive structure by Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service. But this did not deter them because they suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, commonly referred to as TDS, as noted by Democrat Senator John Fetterman, of Pennsylvania, and are represented by the lawyer for Barack Hussein Obama, Gregory Craig. The lower section of the building does not work without the upper section and, likewise, the upper section of the building does not work without the lower. It is all one highly integrated unit! As an example, one venting system, one electrical system, one plumbing system, one security system, one air conditioning and heating system, one elevator connector and, very importantly, one structural steel and enforced concrete system — and more. Even the bullet proof windows and glass, and the heavy steel, drone proof roof, protect what is below. With such a facility, it would have been impossible for an attack like that which took place last Saturday evening in D.C. when an attempted assassin, armed with a shotgun, pistol, and knives, charged through a security checkpoint at the Washington Hilton in an attempt to assassinate President Donald J. Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, and members of the President’s Cabinet and senior staff, during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. The Secret Service fortunately neutralized the assassin before he could reach the ballroom. However, Saturday’s narrow miss—which marks the third assassination attempt on President Trump since 2024—confirms what should have already been obvious: Presidents need a secure space for large events, that currently does not exist in Washington, D.C., and this Court’s injunction stalling this Project cannot defensibly continue, for the sake of the safety of President Trump, future Presidents, and their families, Cabinets, and staff. Defendants thus request that this Court issue an indicative ruling under Rule 62.1 that it will dissolve its injunction. Three assassination attempts—including the attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, where an assassin’s bullet hit the President’s ear—is enough. There is absolutely no argument that a woman walking her dog in the vicinity of the White House has STANDING to stop such a desperately needed structure for the people of the United States of America, as it will provide Presidents, current and future, a secure space to do their jobs.
I kid you not: that is the entire first paragraph of the legal filing. At the very least it raises the question of who actually wrote this. In tone and style, it reads as identical to a typical Donald Trump social media post.
And also, as explained below, it seems to admit to a potential sharing of a top secret military plans with an organization that (in the same paragraph!) the DOJ claims is “fake.”
Beyond the craziness of the filing, there are so many other problems with this. First off, the case is already on appeal at the DC Circuit, meaning that filing this in the District Court is meaningless, given that it’s out of that court’s hands for now. The judge in the lower court, Judge Richard Leon (who is not known for suffering fools gladly), literally has no ability to step in and take back control over the case and change his earlier ruling. That’s not how any of this works.
You would hope the DOJ understands such basic concepts regarding civil procedure. But apparently not!
Separately, as Law Dork’s Chris Geidner points out, the lawyers who filed this (including Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche) aren’t even the lawyers who are on the caption on the appeal:
The Monday night filing was not submitted by any of the 11 lawyers who filed the notice of appeal in the case on April 16. Instead, shortly before the filing, Woodward entered an appearance in the case.
It is very rare for the associate attorney general — No. 3 at DOJ — to enter an appearance in a case, let alone personally file a brief.
Also, if you actually read the filing, the DOJ bizarrely admits that it shared the supposed details of an apparently top secret military structure with an organization it simultaneously deems “fake.” It’s worth breaking down, because it demonstrates, yet again, the hallucinating ChatGPT nature of this President — just keep generating plausible-sounding answers, consequences be damned.
The piece starts out by (falsely) saying that the plaintiffs in the suit, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, is a “fake” organization:
“The National Trust for Historic Preservation” is a beautiful name, but even their name is FAKE because when they add the words “in the United States” to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not.
I mean, no, it doesn’t make it sound like a Government Agency. It makes it sound like a non-profit. And there are many non-governmental organizations that one could argue sound like a government agency: the US Chamber of Commerce, for example. But most people can deal with that.
Next, the filing admits that the details of the ballroom are “top secret” and a national security issue:
In this case, they are trying to stop one that is vital to our National Security, and the Safety of all Presidents of the United States, both current and future, their families, staff, and Cabinet members. They were asked by the United States Military not to bring this suit because of the Top Secret nature of the important facility being built
And then immediately admits that the US government supposedly showed the plans of this top secret military installation of great national security importance to an organization they themselves are claiming is fake:
They were shown detailed plans and specifications of this knitted, unified, and cohesive structure by Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service.
So even taking the filing at its word, the DOJ is admitting to what might very well be an Espionage Act violation — revealing the “detailed plans and specifications” of a “top secret” military facility to a “fake” group.
And that’s their opening argument here!
One can reasonably call into question the underlying lawsuit, or even Judge Leon’s earlier ruling. But this filing is beyond crazy not just in what it says, but how it’s written. In normal times, this filing would be cause for a court to order sanctions against the lawyers filing it. That it’s filed by the Acting Attorney General of the United States should be cause for serious concern. Instead, it’s just another Tuesday.
Filed Under: ballroom, donald trump, legal filings, richard leon, todd blanche
Companies: national trust for historic preservation


Comments on “DOJ Files A Truth Social Post As A Legal Brief — Which Admits To Sharing Top Secret Plans With A ‘Fake’ Organization”
Wow. It reads like it was written by someone in grade-school. Seriously, the dregs of lawyer society are being scraped up and dragged into the Trump administration. Even MAGA’s must be embarrassed.
“…it will provide Presidents, current and future, a secure space to do their jobs.”
Can we knock down the rest of the White House?
Uh, forget about telling the (fake?) National Trust for Historic Preservation about the details of a top secret military installation. Did… the White House just tell us about details of a top secret military installation? Pretty sure there are lots of spy networks all over the world that would LOVE to find out if all the air vents are connected and if hacking the security in the ballroom will get you into the underground bunker. I guess the Very Stable Genius (and lawyer, apparently) answered that for him. Best president ever!
Re: Bad security
They just admitted that their whole security is entirely dependent on not letting a “bad guy” into the ballroom.
That …. seems like poor planning and the plot of some future movie about someone killing or abducting the President.
Re: Re:
I wouldn’t watch a movie like that. The plot sounds too unrealistic and stupid.
Re:
I hear “no redundancy, tightly coupled, single point of failure”. For a facility that could host ~ 2000 people. Good work – hope it’s a large elevator.
Had a good laugh.
That really reads like satire. It sounds like someone is intent on losing the case in a manner no-one in the Trump administration would dare to call him out for. Because you cannot chastise him publicly for this absurd silliness without the argument equally applying to His Royal Arseness Himself.
Re: Had a good laugh.
“. . . you cannot chastise him publicly for this absurd silliness without the argument equally applying to His Royal Arseness Himself.”
On the contrary, double standards are the rule in the Trump Junta, along with foolishness. We may well be seeing someone fool enough to think that “writing” in the President’s style is the most powerful form of argument available.
I hate myself for reading that brief, but holy shit. I kept thinking “okay, these people have jumped the shark. It can’t get worse.” Then the next sentence is worse.
More from the filing: “But, because it is DONALD J. TRUMP, a highly successful real estate developer, who has abilities that others don’t, especially those who assume the Office of President, this frivolous and meritless lawsuit was filed. Again, it’s called TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME. On top of everything else, this project is a gift to our Country from President Trump, and other Donors. It is free of charge to the American Taxpayer. Who could ever object to that!”
The excessive ALL CAPS, quotation marks and exclamation points pervade this entire document. It is one long Truth Social post. This shit show becomes more unbelievable every day. On a side note, didn’t Lindsey Graham just introduce legislation to designate $400M for this monstrosity? Uh, yeah, I object to that.
Re:
And just imagine these lawyers went to school for how long just to file the inane ramblings of a demented pedophile rapist pretending he is world’s biggest strong man.
Re:
It’s almost to the point where the next one might include: “His name is Donald J. Trump, millionaire. He owns a mansion and a yacht.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_Brush
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/WesternAnimation/HareBrush
Re:
The problem is, if that legislation passes, it’ll make this lawsuit moot. The lawsuit argues that a President requires Congressional approval to make major changes to the White House. That legislation is that approval.
Since it’s budget related, they may try to sneak it through using reconciliation which bypasses the filibuster. However, Senate Republicans were already trying to use reconciliation to fund DHS. Unless they do both in the same bill one has to wait for next year.
There was an opinion article I saw that said the whcd couldn’t be staged because it wasn’t professional enough and made trump and company look bad, but this and the warn in Iran show that the argument doesn’t work. Everything they do is an unprofessional blunder.
https://www.rawstory.com/whcd-shooting/
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
The federal judge has no basis to shut down construction and no legal justification to do so. The only possible mechanism to have anyone but the president determine this was funding, but it was privately funded so that doesn’t apply.
Literally the rest of this is just you whining about how you don’t like how Trump talks and acts which is meaningless. Yoh already lost the election you can’t lose again. Try again in 2 years.
Re:
Tell me you didn’t read the ruling without telling me you didn’t read the ruling. And from Richard Leon, who is a very conservative judge.
You are just constantly full of shit. It must be exhausting to be so fucking wrong all the time.
Re:
You have it utterly backward. The executive branch has no legal justification to unilaterally destroy half the White House and make a ballroom, and any judge in an appropriate district can shut down what the government has no legal basis to do if brought a lawsuit to do so.
You’re wrong about a judge’s authority in the same way that Kristi Noem was wrong about habeas corpus when she said:
When you hold a compass, the needle inherits your inverted reality and points toward magnetic south.
Sure, bud. And a terrorist can blow up the White House using privately funded dynamite.
Re:
This is a fucking crazy claim. So if a president decides to just have a billionaire pay for random shit, he can violate constitutional limitations on presidential authority?
Constitutional scholars hate this one easy trick to enable capitalist fascism despite the supposed letter of the law!
“Today, the President had a private billionaire-funded militia kidnap members of Congress to force them vote him as president for life. It’s apparently perfectly legal because no government funding was utilized…”
I’d be impressed by your pretzel twist logic, but you are clearly spineless, so it’s not so surprising after all.
I stopped reading at “trump derangement syndrome.” Anyone who utters those words is a complete waste of space, time, and thought.
Re:
Depends on the context.
TDS when used as an insult by a MAGAt is a stadium sized red flag that the person saying it has a mind only remotely attached to reality and should be seen and treated through that lens.
TDS when used by someone talking about a MAGAt is much more likely to be credible since that’s the only context that TDS actually exists.
Question for people with legal expertise more wise than my own: Assuming the United States has no Attorney General, confirmed, acting, or otherwise, and no one else wants (dares?) to act in that capacity… can the president participate in lawsuits on behalf of the United States pro se? Is that even allowed?
Re:
I’m just as much of a layperson as you are but, I’d think that (once you work through the political appointees) whoever is the senior-most rank-and-file lawyer at the DoJ would be stuck with the Acting AG role. Before we got to your hypothetical, there’d have to be no lawyers at the DoJ anymore.
Can the lawyer who submitted this 'legal' brief to the court...
Can the lawyer who submitted this ‘legal’ brief to the court be referred for censure or disbarment, for filing a frivolous brief? Because that text does not read like anything any qualified and capable lawyer would submit to a court of law. It astounds me how these lawyers debase themselves professionally to support the baseless, frivolous, vexatious, and vindictive court cases for Trump. When some of them start losing their licenses to practice, perhaps some lawyers will start telling Trump ‘No’ when he asks them to demean themselves and the courts.
Re:
Rudy Giuliani already lost his and they’re still doing it.
I bet trump wrote the brief and the lawyers just appended their names to it.