Kansas County Pays $3 Million Settlement For Illegal Raid Of Local Newspaper’s Office
from the from-morally-bankrupt-to-actually-bankrupt dept
This isn’t even the end of the fallout, but it’s a lot of it. A small Kansas town that basically conspired to silence local journalists who were asking too many questions continues to face the consequences of its actions.
That’s a relief. Far too often, power gets abused and the justice system sides with the far-more-powerful abusers. That hasn’t happened here. And maybe that’s because it happened in a small town and involved people whose power was too limited to affect anyone else outside of its jurisdiction.
But it was corruption. And the local government did deserve to get punished. To recount everything that has happened to this point in detail would take a few thousand words. Suffice to say, what happened here rivals anything seen in pop culture that involves the internal rot of small town governments.
Just because you’re wearing a badge doesn’t mean you’re not a bullying thug, as this footage of the (illegal) raid on 98-year-old newspaper owner Joan Meyer’s residence makes clear:
Here’s a quick recap pulled from one of my previous posts, which hits a lot of the highlights (but still remains less than comprehensive):
There’s Kari Newell, a local business person who was seeking a liquor license for a new business when her previous drunk-driving record became public. There’s County Attorney Joel Ensey, who claimed to have no knowledge of the raid until public records showed he actually knew plenty about it beforehand. There’s the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, which also disavowed all knowledge, until it became clear it had knowledge as well, at which point it began publicly condemning Chief Cody and his department. There’s the mayor who didn’t like his deputy mayor and seemed to be all too willing to indulge the police chief. There’s the judge who signed off on the search warrants without reading them and then tried to distance herself from actions — a judge who apparently had some drunk driving problems of her own. There are the communications Chief Cody made to Kari Newell, informing her he was going to raid the newspaper to shut down its coverage of her and, presumably, any further investigation into his law enforcement past. In the middle of all of this, there’s some bullshit computer crime charges, which were invoked despite the newspaper accessing driver record data legally through a third party.
Added to that, there’s the fact that Chief Cody told Kari Newell to delete his texts to her, which has led to the now-resigned police chief facing criminal charges for telling Newell to engage in the destruction of evidence.
There’s also the fact that this settlement — obtained with the assistance of the Institute for Justice — is only part of the payout. Former police chief Gideon Cody and the city of Marion are still facing this lawsuit, which is due to enter discovery in the near future.
Perhaps the most amazing thing about this settlement isn’t the $3 million that will need to be paid to plaintiffs by a local government that can’t possibly just have that much money laying around. It’s the fact that some of the settlements came with a virtual admission of wrongdoing attached:
The county involved in a small-town Kansas newspaper raid in 2023 will pay a cumulative $3 million to three journalists and a city councilor.
In two of the four agreements, the Marion County Sheriff’s Office also crafted a statement admitting regret.
“The Sheriff’s Office wishes to express its sincere regrets to Eric and Joan Meyer and Ruth and Ronald Herbel for its participation in the drafting and execution of the Marion Police Department’s search warrants on their homes and the Marion County Record. This likely would not have happened if established law had been reviewed and applied prior to the execution of the warrants,” the statement reads.
Unfortunately, those apologies were only extended to the owner of the newspaper (Eric Meyer, whose 98-year-old mother died the day after the raid of her home) and vice-mayor Ruth Herbel, who was somehow dragged into this simply because she clashed frequently with Mayor David Mayfield and was hit with a recall petition created by the mayor’s wife.
The other two journalists receiving a payout from the county (Deb Gruver and Phyllis Zorn) will only get the money. There’s no apology in here for them, despite them being equally subjected to unconstitutional searches and seizures by local law enforcement. I’m sure they’re happy with being compensated for rights violations, but it seems weird the county would not extend the same courtesy to people who suffered through an illegal search just because they were at work (rather than in their own homes) when it happened.
In some cases, law enforcement officials violate rights because they think they’re too big to go after. In other cases — like this one — they seem to do it because they think everyone around them is too small to matter. If nothing else, the outcome of this lawsuit has derailed that misconception and hopefully will deter this sort of thing in the future. If it doesn’t, a city and county that have already committed far more money than they possibly ever expected to shell out at one time will find themselves being bankrupted by people hired to not only serve their residents, but ensure their money is well-spent.
Filed Under: 1st amendment, 4th amendment, eric meyer, gideon cody, joan meyer, journalism, kansas, marion county, marion county pd, phyllis zorn, ruth herbel
Companies: marion county record
Last chance! Support our fundraiser today and 



Comments on “Kansas County Pays $3 Million Settlement For Illegal Raid Of Local Newspaper’s Office”
Possible Typo?
Regarding the headline: shouldn’t it be Kansas, rather than Nebraska? I remember this coming up before, of course, but I was surprised to see it showing ‘Nebraska’. Not that, as I’m sure a lot of people would joke there’s a lot of difference… and being from Nebraska, it’s somewhat true, but there you go.
Kansas, not Nebraska
I think this took place in Kansas, not Nebraska.
Lets punish the taxpayers
So the taxpayers in that county get to pay the damages?
Shouldn’t it be the individuals who committed the illegal acts who pay damages/go to jail/etc?
What’s gained by making old Mrs. Smith who lives in her little house beside the old oak tree on County Road 6 pay for the judgement when she had exactly nothing to do with it?
I suppose an argument could be made that the taxpayers in the county hired these people and are therefore responsible for their actions, but it still doesn’t seem to be a particularly just outcome.
Payments from the individuals who did bad stuff and/or ignored the bad stuff that was going on? Certainly. But past that, I’m having a bit of difficulty with this.
Re:
Do you really think anyone could collect three million dollars from those that did this?
Re: Re:
Over a lifetime, sure.
Re: Re: Re:
Lol. Awesome restitution plan, there.
They used their power of authority, representing the city, to abuse these people. The voters probably should have voted in better people or had better oversight.
Re: Re: Re:2
I forgot to ad, 3 million over a lifetime is a LOT less ‘money’ than a lump sum of 3 million.
Re:
What are you, new? This is how things operate since forever.
Should the taxpayers have paid for the defense and settlement negotians?
Shoukd the taxpayers have paid for all the bad behavior, corruption, and bad governance?
This is how goverments set themselves up. Do not fucking blame the (taxpayer!) victims.
Re:
Your thinking like a logical and rational person. The laws that protect these people (and which also punish the taxpayers for this) aren’t written by or for logical or rational people.
Re: who pays
Right. It seems appropriate that the voters who put those thugs into place get to pay the price for their choice.
There is, however, the other side of the question. Between the victims of the thuggery who had their homes and livelihoods invaded or damaged, and the government which did the invasion, I should think the government better able to pay the price. Government may raise taxes and spread the burden. The individual victims do not have that option.
Ultimately, then, it is a question of where the burden should fall. Either it falls on the individual victims, or it falls on all the taxpayers who put the thugs in place.
Uhh, it’s Kansas, not Nebraska.
Not sure if this was a typo.
Re:
This is a “tipo”
This is a “Massachusetts”
Morally bankrupt?
Bankruptcy proceedings will not be opened if you don’t have sufficient assets to pay for the receivership efforts. Calling those lowlifes morally bankrupt is already giving them too much credit.
This happened in Kansas, not Nebraska.
It doesn’t look like anyone is trying to collect it.
There are enough wrongdoers here that, if you start seizing assets, bank accounts, pension funds and so forth, you might get close to three million.
If not, they could make payments for the rest of their lifetimes. “You can keep X amount per month to live on and the remainder goes toward what you owe as part of this lawsuit.”
It seems more fair than the way they’re approaching it now. The wrongdoers get punished instead of those who were not involved.
Re:
That’s not how this works:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trial-over-rudy-giulianis-florida-home-is-delayed-due-to-the-former-nyc-mayors-unexplained-absence
And that is such an absurdly clear case that he has the assets at hand. Let alone trying to take someone’s retirement, or a chunk of their paycheck they’re using 80-90% of to live off of. It’s an immense amount of work to collect from someone, and the amount they will leave them is much higher than you think it is.
Re: Re:
They didn’t say that’s how this works, they said that’s how this should work. You cannot argue ought from is, that the system is designed to make it impossible to collect from the guilty does not support the claim that it should be impossible to collect from the guilty.
Re: Re: Re:
Well then, all the money should magically transported straight to their bank account.
But honestly the entirety of the post is stupid, uniformed, and is fantasy.
And you’re STILL ignoring that there’s not nearly that much juice in these people to squeeze out. And doing it over their lifetime is dramatically reducing their damage.
Still uniformed.
Next we need this sort of happy ending to happen to the Trump administration.
Sincere regret
Sincere regret, cause she died two days after the raid. Lame.
Re: oops 1 day after, not 2 days.
apologies