Trump Admin Goes Full McCarthy, Will Decide Whether Migrants Are Pro-USA Enough To Stay Here

from the does-the-American-flag-make-you-hard dept

This was pretty much inevitable. While the Trump’s band of bigots struggled mightily to expel brown people from this country, the rest of his sycophants are doing everything they can to prevent non-white foreigners from entering the country.

It’s counterproductive, especially when the end goal is at least 3,000 ICE arrests per day. If you don’t let enough migrants in, you’re going to run out of migrants to arrest and deport. It’s simple math, people. But it’s also a simple president, to use the pejorative form of the word.

Marco Rubio’s State Department is doing what it can to filter out people who might be opposed to Trump and/or his policies. Applicants for visas now must subject themselves to vetting that includes deep dives into their social media accounts to sniff out anything slightly smelling of anti-Trump animus. According to Rubio himself, being anti-Trump is the same thing as being anti-America, even though it’s clear Trump has zero respect for everything that actually makes America great.

Apparently, this isn’t working quite as well as Trump or Rubio had hoped. People who don’t like Trump must still be finding a way to enter this country. Not to worry! DHS has just issued guidance that says it can now (or rather, continue) to throw people out because they’re not TEAM USA enough.

In a move that’s completely on-brand for the Trump administration, McCarthyism is now back in play when it comes to allowing migrants to continue accessing rights and benefits that were previously considered to be guaranteed. (h/t Aaron Reichlin-Melnick on Bluesky)

This isn’t hyperbole. It’s excruciatingly literal. The new DHS policy memo [PDF] specifically cites laws created to assist Joe McCarthy’s desire to eject Communists from the country.

For certain immigration benefit requests, such as adjustment of status, the alien bears the burden of proof to demonstrate that a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted.1

[…]

USCIS guidance provides that an alien’s compliance with immigration laws is a relevant factor when determining if a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted. USCIS is updating the Policy Manual to provide additional guidance for officers on the significant negative discretionary weight USCIS assigns in circumstances where an alien has endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused the views of a terrorist organization or group, including those who support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities, antisemitic terrorism, antisemitic terrorist organizations, and antisemitic ideologies, in any case involving an exercise of discretion.2

There are two footnotes attached to these statements. Here’s what the first one links to, the establishment of a burden of proof that is placed on the “alien” seeking to stay in the country — a statute that was created during McCarthy’s height of power.

The second footnote links to a law created directly in response to McCarthy’s witch hunt — the title of which suggests fans of Trump might be too un-American to be allowed to seek residence in the United States:

Prohibition upon the naturalization of persons opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government

I mean… it speaks for itself. If there’s been an administration more tolerant of totalitarianism or less supportive of the rule of law, we certainly haven’t seen it since the final days of the Nixon administration. And at least Nixon had the courage to resign during his impeachment, rather than force himself on the nation repeatedly the way ol’ grab-em-by-the-pussy has.

The end result of the exhuming of McCarthyism is this, at least in terms of what DHS/US Citizenship and Immigration Services will do:

In cases where the alien has engaged in such activities, USCIS will enforce all relevant immigration laws to the maximum degree, including the use of discretion, to deny the benefit request.

This certainly doesn’t sound like maximum degree “discretion,” unless your definition of maximized discretion is always finding a reason to block a non-white migrant from continuing to reside in the United States. That is one way to use “discretion,” albeit one that most people wouldn’t consider to be the defining feature of discretionary power.

There is no further clarification as to what DHS/USCIS consider to be un-American enough to reject applications for permanent residence in the United States. It’s all “discretion” from here on out, which means the DHS can use this power to oust anyone it wants to, regardless of any other reasons migrants have cited as justifying their continued residence in the US.

It’s evil, stupid, and cruel. And that means it’s just another part of the complete Trump Administration set. It’s bigotry backed by laws created to appease a bigot who managed to go mainstream seven decades ago. Everything old is new again… well, except for all the old stuff like Lady Liberty serving as a beacon of hope and America behaving like it might actually deserve the title of “Leader of the Free World” now and then.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump Admin Goes Full McCarthy, Will Decide Whether Migrants Are Pro-USA Enough To Stay Here”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
14 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

A modern retake on an ignored classic

First they came for the migrants here without documentation, and I did not speak out because I was not one of them and anyway I was assured that they were one and all dangerous criminals.

Then they came for those in the country with documentation, arresting them at their mandatory court appearances while casually dismissing their efforts to do things according to the law, and again I maintained my silence because after all immigration is a privilege and who was I to question those that would revoke it on a cruel whim?

Then they came for those born here of migrants, and again I kept my peace because what value are words on some rag called the ‘constitution’ anyway?

Then they started to look my way for my act of being insufficiently ‘patriotic’ by even suggesting that the country’s Dear Leader might be wrong on a subject and others looked away as those that claimed to be from the government came knocking on my door, because after all, who were they to question those in charge?

Upstream (profile) says:

Re: Yep.

What TOG said has been painfully obvious for quite a while now, and it is but one of the aspects of the headlong rush into the depths of vicious authoritarianism. I still find it amazing that so many people just refuse to see it. It is not just voluntary, willful blindness, but insistent, adamant, and fanatical blindness.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

Consider the following: Assaulting law enforcement officers is a felony, and that besides, they’re far more likely to use a greater amount of violence against you if they’re provoked into doing so. If you want to end up in a prison hospital⁠—or a morgue⁠—you go right ahead and try to physically assault the people who have the state-sanctioned right to kill you with few-to-no consequences.

I hope you’re done with this right-wing provocateur shit, by the way. I mean, it’s not working on anyone here and you’ve been trying for months to convince someone to pick up a gun and shoot right-wingers. Does it sting to know that you can’t convince even one person on this site to help you start Civil War II?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...