Step Aside, Schumer. The Nation Can’t Survive With You In Charge.

from the open-letter dept

Dear Senator Schumer:

There is no question that you are a dedicated public servant. You believe in our democracy. You believe in the norms that maintain it. You believe in its mission of bringing us together to promote the general welfare. There are many, many favorable things that can be said about you, your service, and your leadership up to now.

But you are not up for this fight for our nation’s future. And we need in leadership someone who is ready for it, right now, if any of those things that you value are going to survive.

That person is not you. You do not even seem to recognize that the fight for our country’s survival is already upon us. While people take hit after hit, to their livelihoods, physical well-being, freedoms and futures, and already countless have rolled up their sleeves to try to stem the onslaught, you continue as though everything is business as usual and there is not already an existential threat to our country that has landed at our door. “We will fight, and we will win!” you say, as if the moment to begin that fight has yet to come. You keep conjugating the Constitutional crisis in the future tense, apparently oblivious to the fact that it has been unfolding, at greater and greater cost, every day for the past two months, from the moment Trump took office—if not also long before.

And all you have done is greased the skids for it, as you have allowed a lawless tyrant the privilege of normal order that he has otherwise been upending with his every other move. You have allowed him, with only the most minimal resistance, to lawfully embed the corrupt and incompetent into the highest official roles in government, while also effectively allowing his most dangerous henchman to evade Senate supervision entirely as he attacks, without lawful authority or restraint, the country’s infrastructure and resources, as well as Congress’s own legislative and fiduciary roles.

Yet it is not clear that you have even noticed. Because while you acknowledge the role of the courts in trying to, belatedly, clean up the mess, at no point do you seem to understand your own. You have done almost nothing to resist, nothing to fight back, nothing to say no to all of these Trump-driven assaults on our Constitutional order. Your silence instead keeps saying yes.

Worse, you keep undermining anyone else’s ability to stand against it. No matter how right you thought you were on the continuing resolution, to undercut your party as unilaterally as you did is inexcusable. Even if you were right on the merits of the risked shutdown—and at best it was dubious, both legally and in terms of calculating the political cost to the GOP if it were pursued—you could not have been right enough to justify such destructive hubris to blow up the unity and momentum that at last had finally started to coalesce and surrender, for nothing, the power it possessed.

It’s a hubris that also expects voters to be fools. “We will win in 2026,” you predict, while daily negating any reason voters should reward you or your party with such victory and leaving the democratic institutions that would enable such an election to further erode. By refusing to flex your power in any even slightly meaningful way you teach the electorate that there is no point in voting for Democrats, no point giving them any more power, when you so adamantly refuse to use what power you already have. Yet you seem to hope voters somehow won’t notice, that they won’t notice how unqualified you are as stewards of the rule of law, when you cannot even recognize that it has been attacked when laws themselves aren’t obeyed and not just orders, or how ill-equipped you are to do anything but stand idly by while Trump dissects the nation. You do nothing but dull the alarm you should be raising, and yet still you assume the public will flock to Democrats when your silent complicity with all the harm he has already wrought obviates the primary need to elect Democrats at all: to stop it. It will garner no votes to continue down this road of inaction. It will only cause Democrats to lose and the country to be lost—in 2026, or, at this rate, even sooner.

It is time to meet the moment; the only question is how you will decide to. If you stay this course, tightly gripping the reins of power while you sabotage the fight your party and your people are ready and desperate to enter, few will see you as any sort of hero. No message you could hope to deliver will ever be taken seriously if you persist in behaving in this obstructive way. Whatever you may have accomplished in your career will be lost to the sands of time and you will be written into history as a Vichy clown, plagued by obtuse cowardice, who used his own power to make sure the nation would suffer the consequences of his own personal failures.

But if you are the public servant, the statesman, and the man you want to be remembered as, or indeed anywhere near qualified for the leadership role you are trying so hard to hold onto, then the true power play of such a leader is to stand aside. Even if you are at last ready to step up, to lead the fight that must be led, giving way to another may still be the best medicine, to bring something new to the calcified corridors of Congress. How things once were is no longer how they are now, and it is time for a different playbook than the one you had mastered. But you of all people should of course understand the importance of getting out of the way; after all, if you could yield to the GOP on the continuing resolution because you thought it was the right thing to do for the future, then you can yield to your own party for the same reason.

But if you do yield, now, under your own power, with the gratitude of the nation, you can do so knowing that we are a country that understands and appreciates the value of a noble sacrifice for the public good. And how for nearly 250 years we have celebrated those who set aside their power voluntarily, which is a lesson we all would benefit from being reminded of through your example.

Choose, then, to stand down as Senate Minority Leader, as the affirmative gift you are giving to the country you love.

And choose it before it is chosen for you.

WATCH: Schumer says "our democracy will be at stake" if Trump disobeys the Supreme Court—but "we're not there yet."

All In with Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris.bsky.social) 2025-03-19T01:16:28.271Z

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Step Aside, Schumer. The Nation Can’t Survive With You In Charge.”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
46 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Tdestroyer209 says:

I still remember last year when Schumer and Wyden were supposed to amend KOSA by fixing some of the issues but after Marsha Blackburn along with FairPlay/ParentsSOS bought a billboard on Times Square to put pressure on Schumer to pass KOSA through the Senate and few days later he folded like a two dollar suit and eventually pushed it thru the Senate.

Him along with several other senators (Blumenthal, Durbin, etc) need to step the fuck down because they will keep stupid, idiotic bullshit til they either die or they retire which doesn’t seem likely

Schumer folds way too easily and that isn’t great leadership when a leader continuously does that over and over again because that makes the Democrat party look weak.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Dan (profile) says:

Yes... but...

I heard Schumer’s rationale on a TV interview. [paraphasing] … if we don’t cooperate now, our lack of cooperation opens the door for Trump to do much worse…{emergency powers, etc.}
In some way it makes sense, but…

If you give the GOP an inch they will always take a mile, AKA history. For what it’s worth, perhaps the Dems should have walked out and allow things to get as bad as possible. If it did, maybe some of the voters out there would smarten up just a tad and not put a sociopath in the Oval Office just for the sake of the economy (or so is the excuse anyway).

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Thad (profile) says:

Re:

There’s an argument to be made that a government shutdown would be worse than the CR. I don’t agree with that argument, because appeasement never works, but it could be made in a rational way.

It’s hard to imagine Schumer doing a worse job of making the case than he has. He blindsided and sandbagged his own party and their constituents.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Thad (profile) says:

Re:

The argument isn’t accelerationism. It isn’t “let things get worse on purpose”. Letting things get worse on purpose is exactly what Schumer’s doing.

The argument is “do not comply with this administration, and let the Republicans own what they’re doing.”

Maybe a government shutdown would be worse, in the near term, than the CR. But refusing to fight back against the Trump/Musk/GOP agenda just means that the next time is going to be worse, because that’s what happens when you appease a bully instead of standing up for yourself.

Dan (profile) says:

Re: Re: It would be another vector to "Blame the Dems"

It is also true that if the Dems would have “walked away”, the GOP would have said, “all this bad is the Dems doing, they walked out”. (Not being a justification for them not doing it, just putting it out there.)

The indoctrinated MAGA would of course, believe it. Not that they wouldn’t believe anything Trump or Elon says at this point.

“Look the sky is green!” “So at is, Trump. So it is…”

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Not that they wouldn’t believe anything Trump or Elon says at this point.

That’s my view too. But I don’t agree that anyone should be “letting things get as bad as possible”. While there’s no point humoring the “other side” if it’s not gonna get us anything, refusing to co-operate shouldn’t be done out of spite.

Instead, everyone in government should be doing what they were elected to do: to represent their constituents. And if they don’t know, or don’t think it can get the votes, have some spine and stand up for what’s right anyway. That applies to people of all parties; forget who proposed a thing and what party everyone’s with, and consider the effect on the public.

Thad (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Well yes, that’s exactly my point. Democrats are worried about trying to avert things that they cannot avert.

No matter what they do, Republicans and the news media are going to blame them for anything bad that happens.

No matter what they do, Republicans are never, ever going to support them.

And so it is absolutely delusional to make decisions based on trying to avoid those things which will happen anyway.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 With apologies to rabid dogs for the comparison...

Seeing democrats still delusional enough to think that republicans will work with them in good faith if the democrats are just nice enough about it is like watching someone who’s already lost several fingers to an obviously rabid dog try to convince you that it’s their fault for not being nice enough to the dog when trying to pet it… right before they go in for another try.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re:

If we don’t cooperate now, our lack of cooperation opens the door for Trump to do much worse

Some poshy Brit from 1934 just called, saying how jolly proper this policy is.

There’s been a running theme going through several Behind the Bastards episodes: The well-to-do supporting liberal rights and values are not our friends. They identify more with their right-wing peers drinking tea with silver than they do with their liberal / regional / religious colleagues of the working class.

The sooner we’re on our own and focus on organizing a proper resistance, the less hardship we’ll ultimately face, especially as the purges have already begun.

No war but class war.

Thad (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The problem with framing it as purely a class issue is that it ignores all the other various bigotries that cross class lines.

Yes, the ruling class exploits those bigotries to keep the working class divided — but fighting bigotry is an end in itself, not merely something to treat as a subcategory of fighting classism.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Fighting Bigotry

In the 1970s bigotry and equality were big social issues covered in my grade school classes.

All that is now absent from the alleged adults we allegedly elect to public office.

We lost the war on bigotry, or at least have been pushed back to the proverbial beach.

I bet once we (literally) pile the heads of the aristocracy high, the bigotry war will become a lot easier to manage.

But today I am still processing the existence of CECOT and US extraordinary renditions there in defiance of court orders, so I might be a bit spicy.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 It's the same picture

Ending bigotry and ending the stratified class system are the same thing.

The whole point is to create a system in which absolutely everyone, no matter how meek, no matter how useless, no matter how despicable, are regarded the same by the state and the economy.

The failure is that we make exceptions, and as much as we can’t privilege aristocrats, nor can we deny rights to people we think are despicable.

Commonly, liberals are not willing to go that very last mile, having been stuck in a retributive justice system for centuries.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4

The failure is that we make exceptions, and as much as we can’t privilege aristocrats, nor can we deny rights to people we think are despicable.

Commonly, liberals are not willing to go that very last mile, having been stuck in a retributive justice system for centuries.

Uhh, typo? Last I checked it’s not usually the liberals that are out there stamping out the rights of the ‘despicable’.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

All Or Nothing

Worse, you keep undermining anyone else’s ability to stand against it. No matter how right you thought you were on the continuing resolution, to undercut your party as unilaterally as you did is inexcusable…

One of the best things about Trump was that he challenged the existing GOP leaders back in 2016, then he defeated them all, and essentially took over the party. The long time party insiders got upset, so much so that several of them even switched parties. But Trump is very popular with the party base, and now moreso than ever before.

It sounds like you guys need to give it a go. Get the leadership that the party base wants, and end the era of wishy-washy politics.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I remember some Charlie Brown comics back in the day, where he had this small, gloomy storm cloud floating above his head. It followed him around and rained only on him, and Charlie Brown had this absolutely miserable and distraught look on his face. You are the embodiment of that.

Cheer up, and try to smile for once.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

While you’re here. Another AC asked a question you ran away from. So let’s give it another go.

question for Kolby:

How do you rationalize being ok with a foreign oligarch illegal immigrant setting up an unsecured private party used to access “for your eyes only” top secret information;

You; having spent a decade ranting about Hillary Clinton and ‘her emails’ and Hunter Biden and ‘the laptop’ which were nothing, are nothing, and will continue to be nothing.

People who don’t have security clearance will be able to locate top secret information!
but the blovating about national security and rule of law was there.

What happened there, man? I’m getting a bit of cognitive dissonance just thinking about it. I bet you get monster headaches!

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

When you make these gleeful statements that indicate how happy you are with watching the country burn down while cheering the guy setting the fires, I continually wonder how resilient your denial will be later. When things get demonstrably worse for you, are you going to accept it and realize that that is the consequence of what you supported? Or will you go into full denial that the bad shit that’s affecting you personally is actually bad? Or maybe you’ll hit up the old fall back for MAGA and blame the deep state and the liberals even if every negative consequence is yours to own?

This is the rising action stage of the story. The hubris trait in your character is well-established. Now it’s just a question of when the climax and the crash occurs.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
TaboToka (profile) says:

We need a fighter

Stand up and fight and the base will rally.

The major flaw in our system I see is the Founders never envisioned there would be elected officials who couldn’t be bothered to do their jobs.

Moscow Mitch, with his declaration the Senate’s sole goal was to make Obama a 1-term president, then refusing to hold a vote on Obama’s SCOTUS pick(s) was bad. Refusing to even consider removing TFG from office when he was impeached BOTH TIMES is egregious.

The Republicans managed for YEARS to gum up the works, even when they were in the minority. The filibustered everything, they made noise, cranked out soundbites, and hammered Dems constantly. I expect the Dems to do nothing less in return. The ones who can’t/won’t (and party leadership who punish those who do) need to GTFO.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

Stand up and fight and the base will rally.

This is one of the big reasons Trump maintains such fierce loyalty among his voting base even as he works to fuck them over: He makes his base feel like he’s sticking up for them and allowing them to “fight back” against “wokeness”. Democrats are so scared of a fight that standing up to the GOP and Trump in any meaningful way is seen as a grand gesture from a party that would rather help Republicans than throw elbows at them. Part of that is the fault of longtime Dem leadership, Schumer and Pelosi included, who think there are still “decent Republicans” in the GOP even as Trump has driven most of them out. The dream of bipartisanship is dead; as soon as more Democrats realize this and start fighting like the GOP fought Obama way back when, the Dems will be in a much better position.

Fascists abhor a fight, mostly because they want to take what they’re after without a fight. (And partly because they’ve never had a real fight. I guarantee that, as kids, both Trump and Musk never got popped in the mouth by a classmate for saying something stupid.) Anyone who stands up to fascists might lose, but conceding defeat from the get-go means there’s no chance to win at all. The best Dem strategy right now is to stonewall Trump at every possible turn, even if that means, say, shutting down the government. They have to fight even if the odds say they’ll lose⁠—because if they lose, it won’t be because they gave up, and that sets an example for everyone else to follow.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Democrats have one powerful advantage over Republicans: they don’t have to primary against Trumpist goons. Trump killed the Republican party such as it was. “Moderate” Republicans (those unwilling to tell bald-faced lies and openly parade bigoted destructive nonsense) cannot even reach ballots because they are forced to go through elections where the only voters are cultists who view Fox News as mainstream left wing media.

This should be a golden time for Big Tent democratic politics to expand their tent, but they just don’t. It’s baffling.

Anonymous Coward says:

An argument I’ve seen on Threads is that a shutdown would’ve only empowered Trump anyway as he’d get to control which departments reopened and he’d get to blame Democrats for the shutdown (which the MAGAts would gleefully believe).

Meanwhile, voting for the CR gives Democrats the criticism we’re seeing now. They’re in a lose lose situation.

That One Guy (profile) says:

When the choices are 'Vote for an R' or 'Vote for an R pretending to be a D'...

‘Vote for us, we’re not republicans!’ is a lot more believable selling point when you’re not silently or actively supporting the republicans currently dismantling the country.

If they want to get people showing up to the polls to elect democrats in whatever elections might come up in the future they need to be showing those potential voters that they’ll actually get something different from doing so, that electing democrats will give people a better outcome than electing republicans, and so far they’ve been doing the exact opposite as though they thought the number of people who voted for the democrat candidates the last election were somehow too high and they want to see if they can get even less next time.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Hope springs eternal, but...

The Dems have never been great at long-term planning.
If RBG had stepped down, if Obama had pushed his SC candidate, if the DNC hadn’t pushed Bernie back, if Harris had run a real campaign, if Schumer bowed out, etc. Lots of ifs and shoulds.
But they don’t, and they won’t. Whether it’s incompetence, collaboration, or denial, they keep ceding ground to the Right. It’s goddamned disheartening.

Leave a Reply to Ehud Gavron Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt needs your support! Get the first Techdirt Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...