LA Times Flips Anti-RFK Jr. Op-Ed Into Pro-Kennedy Propaganda

from the destroying-trust-in-media-one-billionaire-at-a-time dept

Patrick Soon-Shiong, owner of the LA Times, has been promising to restore trust in media over the last few months. Instead, he has launched an escalating campaign of editorial interference that accomplishes exactly the opposite. First, he blocked the paper from publishing an endorsement of Kamala Harris. Then, he demanded to personally approve all op-ed headlines to avoid offending Elon Musk. He even proposed using AI to artificially balance opinion pieces with “the other side.”

But his latest intervention goes far beyond mere meddling.

The LA Times was set to publish Eric Reinhart’s scathing critique of both US healthcare and RFK Jr’s nomination to head Health & Human Services, noting how much damage he would do to a system that was already broken. Instead, just before publication, the piece was substantially altered and given a new headline that completely inverted its message to appear supportive of Kennedy.

Immediately after it was published, Soon-Shiong took to ExTwitter to promote the op-ed and call for Kennedy’s nomination to be approved by the Senate, saying “Trump’s healthcare disruption could pay off — if he pushes real reform. @LATimes, @RobertKennedyJr. He is our best chance of doing so.”

Tweet from Pat Soon-Shiong as described above, promoting the op-ed as an endorsement of RFK Jr.

The brazen misrepresentation of his work prompted Reinhart to publicly denounce the Times and vow never to work with them again:

As Reinhart points out, the Times didn’t just soften his criticism – they systematically stripped out his core arguments against RFK Jr. and slapped on a misleading headline that completely reversed his intended message.

The extent of the LA Times’ manipulation becomes clear when comparing the published version to Reinhart’s originally submitted op-ed (titled “RFK Jr.s Wrecking Ball Won’t Fix Public Health“). While the published version presents a sanitized critique of healthcare, the original piece drew sharp parallels between RFK Jr. and Luigi Mangione’s killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson — a comparison the Times completely excised.

But perhaps the most damning edit — made just before Soon-Shiong would falsely present the piece as pro-Kennedy — was the removal of this devastating critique at the closing of the piece:

Although RFK Jr. and Luigi Mangione are both responses to the same underlying problem of US healthcare corruption, there is a major difference between them: one operated outside the law to kill one person in defense of millions, whereas the other––via his egomaniacal disregard for scientific evidence––seeks to use law itself to inflict preventable death on those millions.

Let that sink in: Reinhart explicitly warned that RFK Jr’s appointment could lead to the “preventable death” of “millions” — and the LA Times not only stripped this warning from the piece, it then used the neutered version to advocate for Kennedy’s appointment.

This isn’t editorial oversight — it’s literary gaslighting.

As Reinhart notes on Bluesky:

My proposed title and my opening and closing lines do not leave my stance on RFK Jr remotely ambiguous. He’s dangerously ignorant, egomaniacal, and effectively a mass murderer in waiting. He has no business being anywhere near HHS.

The supreme irony here is that while billionaire media property owners like Soon-Shiong, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg constantly bemoan the public’s “distrust in media,” their own heavy-handed meddling has become perhaps the leading driver of that distrust. They’re not just putting their thumbs on the scale anymore – they’re actively rewriting reality to match their preferred narrative.

While blocking publication of an endorsement or op-ed is problematic enough from a trust standpoint, actively distorting an author’s work to argue the opposite of its intended meaning represents a complete betrayal of journalistic principles. It’s not just editorial interference — it’s straight-up journalistic malpractice.

This incident leaves the LA Times in an impossible position. How can readers trust anything published under its banner when its owner has demonstrated such willingness to corrupt the paper’s editorial integrity for his own political agenda? The real victims here aren’t just Reinhart and his mangled op-ed, but the paper’s journalists whose credibility has been irreparably damaged by the owner’s actions.

If Soon-Shiong truly wants to understand why trust in media is collapsing, he need look no further than his own mirror. And no magical AI is going to fix that.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: la times

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “LA Times Flips Anti-RFK Jr. Op-Ed Into Pro-Kennedy Propaganda”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
43 Comments
n00bdragon (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

They’re not conservatives either. The conservative wing of the (former) Republican party has been absolutely run out of town and now lies in exile. Just go take a look at stuff like The Bulwark or The Dispatch where they lurk.

What passes for the Republican Party now is just a hollow personality cult devoid of any unifying ideology.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Just beause they're all bad doesn't mean they don't have them

What passes for the Republican Party now is just a hollow personality cult devoid of any unifying ideology.

Nonsense, the MAGAt cult has plenty of ideologies!

First and foremost you’ve got ‘The Dear Leader is always right, to the extent that if observable reality and the Dear Leader disagree reality loses’…

‘Fuck you, got mine’…

‘Everything good is because of MAGAts, everything bad is because of The Other[Insert thundercrash here]’…

‘The Other is both incredibly lazy and powerless and a dire threat to democracy and society as a whole’…

‘Personal responsibility is for other people, and so is the law’…

See, they’ve got plenty of unifying ideologies in the MAGAt cult!

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

they’re actively rewriting reality to match their preferred narrative

In their mind, that is ‘integrity in media’. These people honestly believe that they are always right, that their ideas are the smartest ones, that their viewpoint is THE correct one. They distrust media, not because of corruption or incompetence, but because the media says things that disagree with them.

Forcing the media to tell the ‘truth’ is their way of ‘correcting’ the ‘problems’ that ‘eroded trust.’

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

Trump and the GOP won control of the government. For the next two years, so long as they can find the votes, Congress can pass whatever the fuck they want and Trump will likely sign it into law. Trump himself managed to weasel his way out of three pending criminal cases by winning the election. Why wouldn’t his asskissing sycophant allies think they can get away with everything now?

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Thad (profile) says:

Re: Re:

so long as they can find the votes

That might be a taller order than it sounds. They have a 2-seat majority in the House and they’ve gone and pissed off one of those two so badly he isn’t showing up to vote anymore.

Remember the last time they had the trifecta, when Paul Ryan was Speaker and they couldn’t pass shit? (Except — surprise! — tax cuts for the rich.) Their majority is slimmer now than it was then.

The bad news is that the Democrats seem to be having trouble locating their backbones and have backed Trump on racist garbage like the Laken Riley Act.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Turns out getting rid of the people who make things work and scapegoating minorities for the inevitable outcome doesn’t result in a stable society.

The problem is there’s a lot of pain and destruction in learning this lesson over and over.

David says:

Re:

Why do these suckups seem so much more maniacal than they did during Trump’s last presidency?

Because it pays off? U.S. voters were deluded into thinking electing a corrupt decadent crime lord would be ok-ish as long as he stands “for the right policies”.

But his openly corrupt nature seeps through the entire fabric of a society equating financial success with merit. Billionaires got where they are by reading the times and keeping abreast of them. So a corrupt center of power brings out the worst in them.

The payoff under Biden and an administration largely tasked with tackling problems in their respective areas of expertise rather than serving a corrupt dictator just wasn’t worth it for them to show their true colors, or rather to show their complete disinterest in colors other than the green print on dollar bills.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Never trust anybody who says they want to restore trust

Anybody who says they want to “restore trust” really just wants you to go back to being credulous so they can continue their same bad behavior. We saw this with the Catholic Church and their sex abuse scandals and many others. What should actually be done is reforming to gain trustworthiness. That this doesn’t even occur to them to even lie about doing it is a Freudian slip which shows just how corrupt they are, that they cannot even conceive of trust as anything other than a resource for deception.

Anybody says:

Re: Re:

“restore trust”
“reforming to gain trustworthiness”

You may get something similar to your wish soon.

Apparently the Great White Hope (Trump and Musk) has plans to literally take the whole government mechanism apart and rebuild it as their personal business office.
By the time 4 years is up, Americans should be so broke that revolt will no longer seem futile, and the Cowards in Power will run. This leaves you with a nice blank slate called America, where you can literally build a brand new government, since none will then exist. Hopefully the phones will still be working…

Rocky (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I’m guessing he is referring to COVID-19 deaths, the excess mortality among Republican voters were about 1.5x higher than among Democrats after vaccinations became available (no statistical significant difference before that).

And from that we can conclude that Republican voters were more likely to spread the infection around increasing the overall excess mortality because a virus doesn’t respect someone’s political choices.

Anonymous Coward says:

Although RFK Jr. and Luigi Mangione are both responses to the same underlying problem of US healthcare corruption, there is a major difference between them: one operated outside the law to kill one person in defense of millions, whereas the other––via his egomaniacal disregard for scientific evidence––seeks to use law itself to inflict preventable death on those millions.

And here Eric Reinhart is mistaken. RFK Jr. isn’t a response to US healthcare corruption, he seeks to become its latest iteration.

Anonymous Coward says:

This sounds like something out of Annie Proulx’s “The Shipping News” – the one scene in which a rookie newsman writes “while an oil tanker serves a utilitarian purpose, you would not hang a picture of one on your wall” and a more senior employee (who owns ten shares in the oil company) rewrites it to say the opposite “I will hang a picture of it on the wall” run under the original reporter’s byline while the next person up, the owner of the local fishwrap, is basically absentee and does nothing.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...