Trump 2.0 To Slather Elon Musk’s Starlink With Billions In Taxpayer Subsidies It Doesn’t Deserve
from the by-'efficiency'-we-mean-'fraud,-waste,-and-cronyism' dept
SpaceX’s Starlink service can be an absolute game changer for those completely out of range of broadband access. Getting several hundred megabits per second in the middle of nowhere is a decidedly good thing, assuming you can afford the $120 a monthly subscription, $375 (or more) hardware fee, and occasional $100 “congestion surcharges.”
But contrary to what many Republicans and c-tier comedians turned conspiracy podcasters imply, Starlink is not magic. And it comes with a growing list of caveats.
The technology has been criticized for harming astronomical research and the ozone layer. Starlink customer service is largely nonexistent. It’s too expensive for the folks most in need of reliable broadband access. The nature of satellite physics and capacity means slowdowns and annoying restrictions are inevitable, and making it scale to meet real-world demand is many years away.
The first Trump FCC tried to give Musk nearly a billion dollars to deliver expensive Starlink access to some traffic medians and airport parking lots. The Biden FCC clawed back those subsidies, (correctly) worrying that the service couldn’t deliver consistent speeds, arguing (also correctly) that if we’re going to spend taxpayer money on broadband, affordable fiber (and fixed wireless and 5G) should be prioritized.
Elon Musk (who purportedly hates subsidies… while routinely gobbling them up) and Republicans threw a giant, protracted hissy fit, falsely claiming that the Biden administration was unfairly targeting Musk for retribution. They held a bunch of show hearings and seeded right wing media with bottomless whining about how a billionaire didn’t get showered with billions in taxpayer subsidies. You know, populism (?).
You’ll Never Guess What Happens Next
Trump’s new FCC boss Brendan Carr (R, AT&T) has acknowledged that it’s probably too late to restore Musk’s $886 million in original subsidies. But there are $42.5 billion in infrastructure bill subsidies headed to the states, and Republicans (who voted against this bill and yet repeatedly take credit for its myriad looming benefits) will make every effort possible to redirect as much of that money to their BFFs.
This Broadband Equity Access And Deployment (BEAD) money is managed by the NTIA and the states, in part because the first Trump FCC (under Brendan Carr’s watch) was so incompetent in managing broadband subsidy programs, the Biden administration didn’t trust the FCC to manage this new program.
Ideally, you’d want a lot of this $42.5 billion in state funding going to open access fiber networks: which help drive not only affordable, high capacity fiber into a region, but help cultivate competition by letting numerous ISPs compete in layers (I wrote a Techdirt/Copia report on this very subject). From there, you probably want to fund fixed wireless and 5G connections. Then fill in the rest with Starlink.
That’s the sensible way to shore up U.S. broadband.
But Republicans really don’t like that a lot of this money is going to popular community broadband options they traditionally despise because they disrupt AT&T and Comcast’s comfy telecom monopoly. Stuff like municipal fiber builds, cooperatives, or city-owned utilities, which increasingly provide better, faster, cheaper broadband access than telecom monopolies or Starlink could ever manage.
So Republicans will be taking every opportunity to redirect these funds away from community broadband and toward whoever does the best job kissing Trump ass. That’s going to be AT&T, Comcast, Charter, Verizon… and Elon Musk. States like Maine and New Mexico have already gotten an early start in redirecting money to Elon Musk’s Starlink and declaring the rural broadband problem solved.
But again, Elon Musk’s satellite broadband network can’t scale to actually meet demand. For several years, telecom analysts have been warning that even with Starlink’s full eventual launch of 42,000 LEO satellites, there’s simply not enough capacity to truly scale. And even reaching that launch target comes with a lot of logistical hurdles analysts aren’t certain can be met.
You’re already seeing network slowdowns, and Starlink has had to start imposing $100 “congestion charges” to help mitigate demand. As the network gets increasingly saddled by Musk’s rush to expand the network’s global clientele (including major militaries and in-flight Wi-Fi deals with major airlines), that congestion is going to get worse — as will the network management tricks Starlink uses to address it.
That means slowdowns, throttled video, throttled big file downloads, and other limitations you’re simply not going to see on fiber or even 5G wireless solutions. At ever higher prices to boot.
So again, if you’re going to spend taxpayer money on broadband, you want to prioritize solutions that drive affordable, reliable, high capacity access that doesn’t harm the environment. You want to spend taxpayer money on broadband solutions that can scale quickly. You want to probably spend taxpayer money on services not overseen by erratic, conspiratorial bigots with a long history of vaporware.
Republicans aren’t thinking about any of this because it’s all about the grift. So in a long list of states, you’re going to see billions of dollars that might have otherwise had a huge impact on broadband connectivity redirected to less sensible options. And historically, Trump’s FCC (including Brendan Carr), have done a piss poor job on ensuring broadband subsidies are spent sensibly, or at all.
So expect an otherwise promising broadband subsidy program that Republicans voted against to get heavily mangled by grift and cronyism, with lot of money spent on less efficient and badly regulated pet projects, all while Musk himself prattles on about his purported adoration of government efficiency and broad disdain for taxpayer subsidization.
Filed Under: broadband, elon musk, high speed internet, satellite, telecom, wireless
Companies: spacex, starlink




Comments on “Trump 2.0 To Slather Elon Musk’s Starlink With Billions In Taxpayer Subsidies It Doesn’t Deserve”
Elon Fudge-musk getting more undeserved cash payouts for his already overfilled pockets, what else is new?
That doesn’t surprise me, given how Elon slathered Trump’s campaign with a quarter-billion dollars (and Trump’s ass with more saliva than most people produce in a year).
Starlink has other problems
It’s increasingly a source of outbound attacks, and attempts by system/network engineers to contact someone, anyone there who actually cares and can do something about it have uniformly failed. To this point, we’ve all graciously tolerated this nonsense, but it’s testing everyone’s patience, and eventually that will run out. When it does, we’ll do what we have to do in order to defend our systems/networks from Starlink.
That will take the form of router and firewall configurations that will (variously) block, slow down, defer, or reject network traffic emanating from Starlink. That in turn will impact Starlink customers, but this is not our problem. It’s Starlink’s and it’s 100% under their control.
My guess is that they’ll do nothing (technically) but that Trump’s obedient submissive collared leashed kneeling pet Elon Musk will get on X and whine, whine, whine about how unfair all of this is.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Elon deserves our money, you socialist scum.
Re:
Hello, thank you for choosing to troll tech dirt readers, today. We greatly appreciate you exercising your right to say dumbass things, as Tech Dirt and its readers really value free speech. If you would like to give Elon Musk all of your money, I highly encourage you to do so. Please comeback and tell us how it’s goes 😘.
Re:
You must be one of those loving so-called christians.
Re: Re:
FYI, you put the term ‘so-called’ in the middle of the phrase instead of the beginning.
Re:
You may continue to cope and seethe until told otherwise.
I hate everyone who voted for this so goddamn much, they are goddamn traitors regardless of their reasons. They have a frickin encyclopedia in their pockets 24/7 yet they willingly choose to be stupid.
Re:
Blame a mixture of disinformation, information paralysis, algorithms, propaganda campaigns, uninformed voters..
But most definitely and in common with all these other causes: People being just plain stupid.
Better than the Bells
So you’d rather give money to the legacy telcos to build out network that they have been getting money for years to build? But yet have done nothing to build out, even in relatively populated areas?
Starlink can at least provide the service that telcos can’t. And have been unwilling to even attempt.
And now that they have announced that they will not be extending copper or even fiber anymore how can we expect them to even think about doing better?
Re:
So, you literally did not read the article, and ignore reality.
No, the money should be going to network operators who actually get the job done. No one here thinks the money should be going to the Bell Zombies.
Also no, Starlink can physically never deliver the service to fill the gaps. Any growth Starlink can ever do is 1) already going to happen, and 2) is funded plenty enough.
Re:
Read the article. They’d clearly rather that money go to community broadband options.
Re: Re:
The ones that haven’t been outlawed by statutes lobbied for by incumbent telcos.
Re:
You are either an idiot who has failed to stay in the loop with your own state’s programs to dole out the money. Or you are deliberately ignoring them. If you actually look at you own state’s programs you might find they use criteria and have program requirements that actually disqualify the big telcos.
Where I live, in Oregon they are requiring 100/100, score based on vulnerability and being unserved and underserved https://biznews.oregon.gov/acton/rif/14786/s-07d2-2412/-/l-0007:4f65/l-0007/showPreparedMessage?sid=TV2%3ATDGWGEyMj
and 0$ is going to the likes of Spectrum, Comcrap,Verizon and what not.
https://biznews.oregon.gov/acton/rif/14786/s-07bf-2411/-/l-0007:5424/l-0007/showPreparedMessage?sid=TV2%3AVERLisiiy
The technology has been criticized for harming astronomical research and the ozone layer. And causing the endless reporting of “UAPs”.
Trickle down economics strikes again
Gotta love that ‘fiscally conservative’ republican party, where helping the poor is a waste of taxpayer dollars but dumping billions into the pockets of billionaires is just sound thinking.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
No amount of “Ah-ha! Caught you being a hypocrite!” is going to stop them kid. Either try something else or shut up already. Your hand-wringing about it just helps them by making you out to be annoying crying babies.
Re: Re:
And your position makes you sound like you have no spine.
Re: Re: Re:
A kid who thinks one of these days doing the same thing that hasn’t worked even once to stop the conservatives will totally work some day if they just keep trying doesn’t have a position to assume anyone elses’.
You had four years to get yourselves a proper strategy to combat them and all you worthless peons can do is keep pointing and shouting, “Hah! You’re HYPOCITES! Take that!”
Re: Re: Re:2
I see you pointing out a lot of problems.
Don’t see you offering a lot of solutions.
It’s going to be a loooooooong four years.
And going to feel even longer if you’re trying to download something via starlink.
If Elon Musk is even HALF as smart as everyone seems to think he is, then that guy we’ve all seen on television ISN’T HIM.
To put it another way, if YOU were the richest man in the World, would you want for everyone to know what you LOOK LIKE? If it were me, nobody would even know my NAME…
Hard part.
Small sat’s wondering the world??
How to keep them from wondering into other nations Air space??
They really should not have much Fuel in them, as they Launch MANY in each launch.
Also, Failure rate is Huge.
And There are some falling out of the sky.
When billionaire Musk is willing to jump like a monkey and blow Trump, he deserves it.