FBI Looking To Use Amazon’s Facial Recognition Tech To ‘Recognize’ Stuff That Isn’t People’s Faces
from the oh-cool-the-government-is-getting-into-the-content-scanning-business dept
A half-decade ago, Amazon was an emerging player on the facial recognition scene. Its proprietary blend was called “Rekognition.” At the outset, Amazon was definitely interested in getting it in the hands of as many cops as possible. Documents obtained by the ACLU showed the company was courting law enforcement agencies, seeking to sell them a high-powered facial recognition variant capable of doing things its competition couldn’t.
Rekognition can identify, track, and analyze people in real time and recognize up to 100 people in a single image. It can quickly scan information it collects against databases featuring tens of millions of faces, according to Amazon.
Like other providers of technology to law enforcement, Amazon kept this under wraps by tying up public agencies with restrictive non-disclosure agreements, agreements law enforcement agencies cited while rejecting public records requests.
Rekognition, as powerful as it was, still suffered from the major flaws inherent in its competitors. It performed much worse when applied to minorities and women, resulting in 28 members of Congress (most of them people of color) being misidentified as wanted criminals during a test run of the product by the ACLU.
This very public failure was soon followed by a string of very public failures (i.e., the killing of Americans, most of them minorities) by law enforcement agents, culminating in the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, an event that prompted demonstrations across the United States.
Amazon reconsidered its cop-forward position and decided it wasn’t going to be part of the problem. In June 2020, it announced it would no longer be giving law enforcement agencies access to its facial recognition tech.
Given that it issued a “hands off” notice to law enforcement, it’s something of a surprise that it’s now providing its Rekognition tech to the FBI, as first reported by Fedscoop. A summary of the story as Jessica Hardcastle reports for The Register, explains:
The FBI plans to use Amazon’s controversial Rekognition cloud service “to extract information and insights from lawfully acquired images and videos,” according to US Justice Department documents.
In its Agency Inventory of AI Use Cases, the DOJ lists the project, code-named Tyr, as being in the “initiation” phase for the FBI, which intends to customize and use the technology “to review and identify items containing nudity, weapons, explosives, and other identifying information.”
That information comes from the DOJ’s roundup of its in-progress AI projects [PDF]. And, at first glance, this would appear to violate Amazon’s promise to keep this tech out of cop’s hands.
But there are several caveats. As Amazon pointed out to The Register (and to Fedscoop) in response to a request for comment, it didn’t actually say cops couldn’t use the tech ever. They just couldn’t use it to do the thing they were most likely to use it for had Amazon not restricted that aspect of it.
“Amazon has implemented a moratorium on use of Amazon Rekognition’s face comparison feature by police departments in connection with criminal investigations. This moratorium does not apply to use of Amazon Rekognition’s face comparison feature to help identify or locate missing persons.”
So, there’s the loophole that law enforcement can use. And Amazon’s overall restriction does not apply to government agencies that aren’t in the business of law enforcement. However, the FBI is clearly a law enforcement agency and definitely would be interested in deploying another facial recognition option.
But, according to the DOJ document, Amazon’s tech is going to be used to “recognize” things that aren’t human faces.
Amazon Rekognition offers pretrained and customizable computer vision (CV) capabilities to extract information and insights from lawfully acquired images and videos. Currently in initiation phase to customize to review and identify items containing nudity, weapons, explosives, and other identifying information.
Content moderation, but it’s the FBI. The document doesn’t explain the end goal of this use of the tech. And another project listed in the document suggests Amazon’s tech is only part of the process. The other project also involves search content for certain things.
Computer vision algorithms trained using AI techniques are used to classify and identify content in lawfully acquired images and videos to enable a user to quickly find “content” of interest in multimedia data. All results are reviewed by a human and no action is taken automatically based on the sole result of the algorithms.
Adding these together and it sure looks like the FBI is trolling the open web looking for evidence of criminal activity. That’s a bit worrying if that’s what’s actually happening. It could be this tech would only be applied to content retrieved from seized devices or whatever, but the potential to convert the internet into an FBI fishing hole remains.
We’ll see where this leads. Or, you know, maybe we won’t. It all depends on how well the FBI can keep its secrets. And it’s not the only concerning thing utilizing unproven tech on the list. The DOJ is also hooking up the ATF to existing ShotSpotter systems run by local law enforcement agencies, adding yet another way for false positives to go horribly wrong. And another ongoing project utilizes AI to scan documents to identify privileged communications between suspects and their lawyers, hopefully to prevent DOJ prosecutors from accidentally accessing these communications.
Amazon is back in the law enforcement business, even if its facial recognition tech isn’t being used to search for faces. Then again, it never really left. It just allowed us to engage in our own assumptions about what its moratorium meant. And if we were wrong, well… that’s on us.
Updated to credit Fedscoop who reported on this prior to The Register.
Filed Under: facial recognition, fbi, rekognition
Companies: amazon
Comments on “FBI Looking To Use Amazon’s Facial Recognition Tech To ‘Recognize’ Stuff That Isn’t People’s Faces”
Silver lining
No more tough questions for the FBI such as, “Sir, is that an erection in your pants?”
So they cut access to Ring video data, but they still looking to partnership with law enforcement
Until the system is 90% right, and so would be used automatically in 90% of the other cases.
Someone doth protest too much...
The FBI plans to use Amazon’s controversial Rekognition cloud service “to extract information and insights from lawfully acquired images and videos,” according to US Justice Department documents.
…
Amazon Rekognition offers pretrained and customizable computer vision (CV) capabilities to extract information and insights from lawfully acquired images and videos. Currently in initiation phase to customize to review and identify items containing nudity, weapons, explosives, and other identifying information.
…
Computer vision algorithms trained using AI techniques are used to classify and identify content in lawfully acquired images and videos to enable a user to quickly find “content” of interest in multimedia data. All results are reviewed by a human and no action is taken automatically based on the sole result of the algorithms.
While the claim that everything will be run by a human before any action is taken sounds nice(whether or not they’ll actually do it being another matter) putting that much emphasis on lawfully acquired has me suspecting that they’re trying to hide exactly how and what they are ‘acquiring’ by hoping that people focus on the ‘lawful’ part and ignore everything else.
Just a reminder but the NSA’s actions pre-Snowden could(thanks in large part to their rubber-stamp, faux ‘court’ and pet judges) almost certainly have also been described as ‘lawful’ by the agency at the time.
Non-Disclosure Agreements Vs Public Records Requests
Since the article implies that many of the restrictive NDAs are written specifically to stymie public records requests, can someone tell us what the law says about that?
It seems to me that in most cases an NDA with a public agency is mainly used to conceal exactly the kind of things NDAs were created for. But, what do I know.
America does not have any law enforcement officers, just duplicitous criminals in uniform with police running for profit child porn sites that could be accessed by anyone in the world if they chose to. Do you think that your police department will go to Europe, Asia, Africa, or Latin America to arrest someone in one of those regions, or just continue to profiteer off of sexually enslaving chikdren for themselves like ghetto pimps would do? How much money the police have raked in by illegally sexually enslaving children is a mystery since it is using the prefered organized crime currency, cryptocurrencies. Considering that it is on TOR, what do you think the liklihood of American police arresting any of them is? If we didn’t have the police, politicians, and FBI, we wouldn’t have police child porn sites, Jeffrey Epstein, Ghilsaine Maxwell, NXVIM, or the Lincoln Group. Solving crime is not something that any of them have any intention of doing. Committing crime and getting awy with committing crime is all that they are interested in doing.
Re:
What an amazing wall of screed!
The FBI Further Clarified
“It’s not for us; it’s for a friend.”
It was ever thus. From The Denver Post, Feb 6th 2000 (so almost a quarter of a century ago, an investigator from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation was quoted saying the quiet part out loud:
Re:
Give me 5 urls from the most honest man…
— Cardinal Richelieu
How many HOLES?
How many ways to bypass all of this.
How many ways to mess with ALL of this?
How many ways to HIDE USE of all of this.
Rekognition: Get rekt before you rek everone else.
EULA
Glossary:
“lawfully” acquired = “we bought access from a third party”
“Images”, “video”, “media” = contents of people’s cell phones/tablets/computers
“review and identify items containing nudity, weapons, explosives, and other identifying information.” = find potential evidence of people doing things we don’t like.
“reviewed by a human and no action is taken automatically based on the sole result of the algorithms” = all matches are stuffed into a database connecting possible “evidence” to identities
Translation: we want a fully automated system that can continuously sift the millions of pictures and videos on everyone’s personal devices for potentially incriminating content in order to build and maintain a naughty and nice database that would make Jolly St. Nick Green with envy.
Personally, I truly believe it won’t be misused at all. In no way would any federal agency of these United States ever just reduce all investigations down to a database query.
“select identities, evidence, current_location from naughty_list where person_type=’those people’ and searchable_pretext_probability > ‘lots’ and predicted_warrant_results >= ‘conviction’ order by distance_from_me;”
Given the imaginative interpretation law enforcement can apply to any situation pictured, one could just pipe the results to the online law enforcement app that generates the affidavits, sends them to the judge, returns the signed warrants, and before you know it, we could finally start Making America Gr….
No…that would never happen.
Simpson's did it!!!
“And we are back, with more of people who look like things”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TZdidJx57k
“It performed much worse when applied to minorities and women, resulting in 28 members of Congress (most of them people of color) being misidentified as wanted criminals during a test run of the product by the ACLU.”
Not sure that result is actually evidence of a failure.
FBI: Amazon, Find Suspect.
Amazon: Finding Susie’s Spectacles…….
FBI: NO, I need to you Find Terrorist.
Amazon: Finding pictures of Terrier Kisses.
Amazon should have the FBI inundated with video then considering that ring door bells are not installed high enough to show peoples faces at the door. How did they miss that? The door bells are not higher. So the camera is not at the level of anyone’s face either.