DOJ Report Calls Botched Uvalde School Shooting Response A Series Of ‘Cascading Failures’

from the serving-up-no-protection dept

Any school shooting is horrific. But the Uvalde school shooting went far beyond the usual nightmarish levels of something that happens so often in the United States, we can actually use the modifier “usual.”

Police officers entered the school three minutes after the shooter did. But they did not actually end the terror until more than an hour later.

The problem wasn’t numbers. An earlier report on the shooting — compiled by Texas state officials — made it clear there were plenty of law enforcement officers on hand.

According to the report, 376 law enforcement officers massed at the school. The overwhelming majority of those who responded were federal and state law enforcement. That included nearly 150 U.S. Border Patrol agents and 91 state police officials.

It took 376 officers 77 minutes to finally enter the classroom and kill the shooter. For most of an hour, officers continued to arrive at Robb Elementary, but no one made a move for the classroom. The first officers on the scene, which included then-police chief Pete Arredondo, made one move towards the classroom but retreated when the gunman opened fire. No one took command of the situation, even though both the chief and deputy chief of the Uvalde PD were on the scene.

It didn’t end until federal officers opened the door and killed the shooter, walking through a door officers had assumed was locked. Rather than try the handle, more than 20 minutes was wasted trying to find keys.

Footage from body cameras and the school’s own surveillance cameras showed the horrific truth of the situation. For most of the recordings’ run time, officers are doing little more than standing at the end of the hall. What’s observed on body cam recordings is a bunch of officers searching for someone in command of the situation, only to come up empty handed.

Twenty minutes into the ordeal, the Uvalde PD — thanks to its chief — decided to treat this as a “barricaded suspect” situation rather than what it actually was: two adjoined classrooms full of teachers and students, some of them still alive.

The DOJ report [PDF] is a difficult read. It runs more than 600 pages, detailing every misstep, and recommending changes to better handle future school shootings. But what comes through clearest is the fact that this response was a failure on every level.

Police officials who responded to the deadly Uvalde, Texas, elementary school shooting waited far too long to confront the gunman, acted with “no urgency” in establishing a command post and communicated inaccurate information to grieving families, according to a Justice Department report released Thursday that identifies “cascading failures” in law enforcement’s handling of the massacre.

The report, the most comprehensive federal accounting of the maligned police response to the May 24, 2022, shooting at Robb Elementary School, catalogs a sweeping array of training, communication, leadership and technology problems that federal officials say contributed to the crisis lasting far longer than necessary. All the while, the report says, terrified students inside the classrooms called 911 and agonized parents begged officers to go in.

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the response was how much time passed between the first attempt to enter the classrooms and the eventual killing of the shooter. What’s seen in recordings, heard in interviews, and detailed in this report is the abdication of duty performed by hundreds of officers.

These same officers were praised by Governor Gregg Abbott shortly after the shooting, with the governor saying these “brave” officers had “run towards the sound of gunfire.” That’s not what the recordings showed. Those recordings — which both the Uvalde PD and Texas Department of Safety fought to keep out of the hands of public records requesters — showed the opposite. They showed a bunch of officers milling about ineffectively in the general area of recent gunfire. It showed officers allowing students and teachers to remain in mortal danger while they tried to rustle up some suitable body armor.

The DOJ’s report directly addresses this aspect of the botched response by reiterating the base expectations for officers responding to school shootings (emphasis in the original):

Officers responding to an active shooter incident must continually seek to eliminate the threat and enable victim response. The shooter’s immediate past actions and likely future actions serve as “triggering points” that indicate the appropriate response should be in line with active shooter response protocols. An active shooter with access to victims should never be considered and treated as a barricaded subject.

That point is driven home a couple of paragraphs later.

Officers responding to an active shooter incident must first and foremost drive toward the threat to eliminate it.

This is what people expect. The public believes law enforcement officers will place themselves in harm’s way to stop a killer from killing more people. Cops believe this too. They talk up the “thin blue line” and hold themselves out as selfless heroes. That façade collapsed in Uvalde. These officers felt they did not need to “drive toward the threat” until they were a bit more protected from the threat. And that’s a hard thing to stomach: officers prioritizing their safety over the lives of children.

The entire report is worth reading, but it’s a lot to handle all at once. Every page details another failure, ranging from the school security protocols not being observed (leading to unlocked exterior doors) to officers feeling so at ease at being in a school with an active shooter they did things like avail themselves of hand sanitizer pumps and offering each other fist bumps while waiting for something to happen. And the horror didn’t end there. Tons of miscommunications resulted in parents being misinformed about their children, leading some parents of murdered children to believe they were still alive and leading others to falsely believe their children had been killed.

There will rarely be a perfect response to mass shooting. But this one went so far outside the acceptable margin for error, a grand jury has been convened to see if any of the responding officers should face criminal charges for doing their jobs this poorly.

Hopefully, this report will force law enforcement agencies to take a long, hard look at their mass shooting response training to ensure it actually prepares officers to run towards gunfire and, for those in leadership, create some semblance of order from chaos. The saddest thing about this is that we even need this to be an essential part of law enforcement training. But since we, as a country, are pretty much unwilling to take the steps needed to reduce the number of shootings, we’re forced to perfect our responses to this inevitability of American life.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DOJ Report Calls Botched Uvalde School Shooting Response A Series Of ‘Cascading Failures’”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
29 Comments
Slow Joe Crow says:

Follow your damn training

Part of the cascading failure Uvalde police completely ignoring everything they learned in “active shooter training” they had supposedly done that year. Compare and contrast with the Covenant School attack where the police immediately engaged the shooter, displayed clear command and astute tactics and neutralized the attacker in less time than it took Pete Arredondo to abandon his radio.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

It didn’t end until federal officers opened the door and killed the shooter, walking through a door officers had assumed was locked. Rather than try the handle, more than 20 minutes was wasted trying to find keys.

And if it were really locked, the ONE time they would be justified in kicking in a door and shooting someone, they didn’t…

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

If you're only 'brave' when you have all the power...

Police: The public may whine and complain about ‘violations of rights’, ‘unnecessary force’ and ‘you killed how many unarmed people this year?!’ but when things have really hit the fan and lives are on the line they’ll see how important we really are to keeping the public safe.

Literally hundreds of police when lives were on the line: Woah woah woah, you’re telling me someone might shoot back? Those kids are on our own, we’re staying out here until the situation resolves itself upon which I’m sure everyone will congratulate us on how brave we are and agree with us about how a handful of dead citizens a year are totally a worthwhile price for our protection.

This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Arijirija says:

Decorations in order

Isn’t that what people join the services, civil and military, to get? We need a new decoration, to commemorate cowardice below and beneath the call of duty.

I suggest we confer on these Police Officers, the Yellow Stained Brown Splattered Underpants.

I once knew a cop in the Australian Federal Police force, when I was living in Canberra. He wouldn’t hesitate to confer such a well-deserved honor on such officers as these. But then, he would not have hesitated to protect the children by any means within his power. And he did his job without having a portable armory except in emergency situations.

dickeyrat says:

If there were any loose pretense of justice left in Amerika, including even Texas, the City of Uvalde would be summarily dissolved, with all funds and assets thereof divided among the familial survivors of the children and teachers slaughtered by the dead maniac with his AR-15 (an object of worship, held sacred by most GQP’ers). All of the so-called law enforcement officials involved in the incident would be held legally & criminally liable as Accessories to Murder. Pure & simple. But as we know, “justice” is an obsolete concept in post-trump Amerika. So these remedies will not be realized. Pure & simple.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

I've read the DOJ report

It’s one of the hardest things I’ve ever read. Nearly every page itemizes another act of stupidity and/or cowardice, which is maddening by itself – but coupled with the fact that each one of those acts directly contributed to the mass murder of children, it’s enraging.

Even the simplest, most fundamental maxims of shooter situations (“get the shooter’s attention and fire directed at you instead of at civilians”) were ignored. Not one cop had the courage to charge the shooter and risk taking a bullet – in order to give others an opening to take him down. And they spent more time and effort threatening parents than saving children.

No one involved in this fiasco should ever be allowed to work in law enforcement again. Everyone involved in this fiasco should be criminally prosecuted.

And let it be noted that this happened in Texas – the same state where the Texas National Guard is currently being used to murder defenseless, desperate migrants. We are a long way from the glory days of “One riot, one Ranger” and selfless acts of bravery.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

This is what happens when you have a system that incentivizes people with power going “I feared for my life!” and constantly treating them with kids’ gloves afterwards… which is far more than the actual kids in this case got.

Pro-police shills going “When shit happens I’ll bet you call the police” basically got the worst counterpoint handed to them. Which is better than they deserve.

ECA (profile) says:

" rustle up some suitable body armor. "

So,
WHERE was the armor at? NOT in the backend of the cars? Not in the Duty officers handling?

And 90% of this deals with 20 minutes of time. 20 min here and anther 20 there?

In the first 20 minutes if they TRIED the door, and had shots fired? AND had Shields and protection?
A THING’ you might see in video games are people who peek and get shot, and those that Just Run, and Pre-shoot(yes its a thing) can get across an area, as it takes 1 split second for the enemy to spot and shoot you, If you are peeking or SLOW.
Its called RUSHING.

“Police officers entered the school three minutes after the shooter did.”
This has little meaning as I DONT THINK they followed him into the building, and Knew where he was.

AND STILL,
Where are the bean bag gun, rubber bullets and CATCHING THE IDIOTS so we can ask them “WHY IN HELL they did it?”

From original story was a teacher inside was the girl friend of a family member. they dont mention names or IF that was the room he went to.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...