Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the new-year,-new-comments dept
This week, both our winning comments on the insightful side come in response to worrisome ruling in California that denied Section 230 protections to Snapchat because it has disappearing messages. In first place, it’s radix with thoughts on the potential implications:
I can’t wait for every document shredding company to be swept up in every mail fraud case. 🙄
In second place, it’s an anonymous comment from an exchange about what exactly the ruling means:
But allowing an intentional design feature, transient messages, to be considered as possibly a defective design is also very worrying.
For editor’s choice on the insightful side, we’ve got two comments about the Utah governor who is absolutely positive that social media harms kids. First, it’s blakestacey expanding on a couple of specific points in our post:
“However, many of the studies also agree that for a small — but still important — group of teens, social media can exacerbate existing mental health problems, when they seek to use it alone as a kind of medication, allowing them to go deeper.“
And of course, adults never do this.
“That’s not to say there isn’t some sort of mental health crisis going on these days. Almost every expert believes there absolutely is.“
One thing’s for sure: This cannot have anything whatsoever to do with the fact that the world is shit and on fire.
Next, it’s an anonymous response to the Governor saying he’s seen the negative effects on his own kids:
Could it he is the cause of their problems by being over authoritarian, and control everything that they do?
Over on the funny side, for our first place winner we head back to last week’s round-up of the annual winning comments, where one commenter wondered what happens to comments that come in on that post. But I pull comments from Sunday through Saturday each week for these posts, making those comments eligible for this eek. So Pixelation‘s reply handily won in contradiction of itself:
They are lost in the void, never to be counted. An ignominious ending for great comments.
(However in case you are wondering, it did not rack up so many votes that it should have been a late addition to the annual winners.)
In second place, it’s a simple anonymous comment on our post about sending cops to search classrooms for controversial books:
Happy new year 1984!
For editor’s choice on the funny side, we start out with an anonymous comment responding to the assertion that corn subsidies are mainly driving biofuel:
High Fructose Corn Syrup has entered the chat.
Finally, we head back to our post about the governor of Utah for one last anonymous suggestion:
Utah is going about this all wrong
The real way to keep kids off of social media is to make it required and establish minimum post quotas.
That’s all for this week, folks!


Comments on “Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt”
replies?
“High Fructose Corn Syrup;”
HOW sweet it is.
“real way to keep kids off of social media ”
Even better MAKE it Mormon requirement.
But what happens to the funniest or most insightful comments the last week of the year?
Re:
They were noted and linked in the end of year summary, but there were no editors choices.
I don’t know, we’ve a long history of exactly that. The design of the gas tank on the Ford Pinto is probably the canonical example.
The question, I think, is more which parties should be considered when deciding whether the impact of a design decision makes it defective by design or not.
Re:
The Pinto gas tank was a defective design, in that it ruptured all too easily endangering life and limb. Deleting messages after they have been read or similar is not a defective design, it just annoys cops who think that every electronic communication should be preserved and made available to them on demand.
Re: Re:
Either way it’s just a question of time before the content goes up in flames.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
More anti-police hate speech on this depraved site.
The only two groups that readers feel so free to express hatred towards are White men and law enforcement. And Jews, too, I guess.
Re: Re: Re:
Yeah, so you’ll explain how that is remotely hate speech. Or how anyone is expressing hate toward ethnicities. Or why you think it’s ok to use racial hatred as a tool for your rhetoric. Depraved is in your mirror, homes.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
You know exactly what’s hateful about the anti-police narrative that’s pushed here relentlessly, and the unfair, race-based contempt that successful White men like Elon Musk are subjected to.
Re: Re: Re:3
Man, oh, man. You really had me going there for a moment.
You mean like Joe Biden, Anthony Fauci, Edward Snowden, and Aaron Schwartz?
You really should put a ‘/s’ on your posts, or people will think you are serious!
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
They love Schwartz here because he was a mentally ill coward who killed himself rather than take responsibility for his criminal activities.
Re: Re: Re:5
Hi, antidirt.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
Bawk! Bawk! Chicken Mike!
Re: Re: Re:7
Good to know you’re same shiteating copyright fucktard as ever.
Re: Re: Re:7 At least you’re here and not shooting up a school
Stupid, mentally ill, and a racist. You’re a real triple threat bro.
Re: Re: Re:8
antidirt never did get back to my question about whether his wife knows that he got into copyright law just to fuck with Masnick.
Re: Re: Re:3 Swing and a pair of misses
You know exactly what’s hateful about the anti-police narrative that’s pushed here relentlessly, and the unfair, race-based contempt that successful White men like Elon Musk are subjected to.
Anti-corruption isn’t anti-police unless you want to put forth the idea that corruption is so intrinsic to the police that it’s a core part of the profession, in which case you just insulted them way more than any of the articles here ever have.
As for poor little Elon a valiant effort but his race isn’t why he gets mocked and criticized, as anyone who actually reads the articles he comes up in could tell.
Re: Re: Re:3
I’m sorry, but you have the wrong site. Your fellow professional contrarians work at the New York Times these days.
Re: Re: Re:3
Oh, I’m pretty sure the hate is irrational and not based in at least several centuries of history…
Like, for example, the first policemen being slave catchers, for instance.
Also, I’m very, very sure that Elon “father owned an emerald mine” Musk was one of the very last benefactors of… apartheid. Which has its roots in European colonization.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
You lie so shamelessly, you anti-African scum!
via BI: “Elon Musk really was telling the truth by saying his father Errol never owned an emerald mine, biographer says”:
Re: Re: Re:5
So, does that mean his other simp-authored biography was lying all along?
It’s kinda funny that it mentions the emerald mine and not Issacon’s biography…
Re: Re: Re:6
Considering the amount of times Errol Musk have told people about the emerald mine and then later admitting that some of the business around it wasn’t entirely legal I wouldn’t be surprised that they are now trying to white-wash that whole story.
And this particular troll you are responding to is just another disingenuous asshole who uses “your are a racist” or variants of it as a stupid gotcha to defend other assholes. Talk about being stupid as a rock.
Re: Re: Re:3
That you equivocate anti-corruption/anti-criminal with “anti-police” is telling.