Everyone Makes Mistakes, But When Cops Make Mistakes, The Guns Come Out

from the this-is-just-how-we-do-it-here dept

There’s a massive gap between how the policed view “reasonable” policing and the view held by those who do the policing. While most of us would prefer more accountability, transparency, and de-escalation, those who claim to “serve and protect” seem to prefer the polar opposite.

We get opacity, violence, and insular behavior any time we question why cops need to treat even the most routine of interactions with implied — if not actual — deadly force.

And that dichotomy has once again been clearly illustrated by victims of undue force deployment. While this stop does involve a license plate, it does not involve the tech (automated license plate readers [ALPRs]) normally associated with suspicionless stops that soon escalate to guns-out encounters with “reasonably scared” law enforcement officers.

Instead, it deals with normal human error. But when cops screw up, it’s the people they serve who can end up dead. At the very least, human error by cop means the casual terrorizing of people who’ve done nothing wrong. And so, as is detailed here in this report by Rebecca Carballo for the New York Times, the end result is people who’ve probably never broken a law in their life being treated like violent felons by government employees who can’t even possibly imagine they’re in the wrong.

Demetria Heard was driving with her family from their home in Arkansas to a youth basketball tournament in the Dallas area on July 23 when she noticed that a police officer had been following her for several minutes.

She told herself it was probably nothing, but soon the siren was on and the cruiser’s lights were flashing. She pulled over, and the next thing she knew, an officer was pointing a gun at her Dodge Charger.

Body camera footage later released by the Police Department in Frisco, Texas, north of Dallas, shows an officer ordering Ms. Heard to get out of the car and walk backward toward officers on the side of the closed freeway. Officers then instructed her son, who is in the sixth grade, to do the same.

These cops screwed up. But that didn’t stop them from doing what they did. The problem here? The officer entering the license plate number while trailing the car punched in “AZ” instead of “AR.” There’s a massive amount of miles between the two states and an even larger difference when it comes to entering license plate numbers.

It was only several minutes after ordering everyone out of the car at gunpoint that the officers discovered the error. And while it’s nice the department has offered an apology to the traumatized family, no one on the law enforcement side has even suggested officers should hold off on the deployment of (at least threatened) deadly force until they’re sure they’ve got all the (accurate) information they need.

Understandably, there’s a lawsuit on its way. The Fourth Amendment does not allow this behavior unless the officers can show they had reasonable suspicion to perform the stop and probable cause to escalate to detaining people at gunpoint.

The seemingly positive reactions from the involved officers and their employers are inextricably linked to public coverage of their actions. If they were truly concerned they’d screwed up, the officers and their department would have reached out long before this stop made national news.

Like I noted at the opening of this post, it’s human to err. (Forgiveness is still divine, so it’s not “reasonable” to expect that from anyone, especially the people who were manhandled at gunpoint because a cop punched in the wrong state code.) The difference is that, for most of us, our errors rarely lead to us pointing guns at other people with the implicit intent to kill. At best, most of us create minor inconveniences for coworkers and customers.

But law enforcement operates in an entirely different reality. While some of its actions can be justified by its law enforcement utility, many of its actions are propelled by so-called “training and expertise” that drills into officers the belief that everyone they interact with is a possible criminal, and likely a dangerous one at that. But even with our insane incarceration rate, the most logical conclusion is that 99% of people stopped by cops aren’t criminals. And that’s what should guide their responses, rather than the assertions of training personnel who choose to portray millions of innocent people as anthropomorphized loaded guns constantly aimed at the heads of the Boys in Blue.

For once, automated tech isn’t to blame for a guns-out traffic stop. But that’s hardly good news when human error results in the same reaction.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Everyone Makes Mistakes, But When Cops Make Mistakes, The Guns Come Out”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
18 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

The truly insane part is it wasn’t the result of some sort of bad coincidence where their license plate number was the same as an Arizona license tied a stolen car or wanted felon. The license came back as not a valid Arizona license plate number. So instead of them double checking they had the license details correct they instead assumed it must be suspicious and the occupants deserved the full felony stop treatment.

Anonymous Coward says:

The typical davec response to this sort of observation is to whine about what would happen in an alternate scenario or universe, where the innocent wasn’t actually innocent or the cop might have been shot first if they didn’t go in all guns blazing. To them, this apologism sounds like it’s defending brave souls who risk their lives. In reality, all it sounds like is defending angry children throwing a tantrum because their toys might be taken away for violent roughhousing.

The “one bullet away from death” thing davec loves to bring up as a cop rant applies to the people they aim at, too, a good number of whom are misidentified civilians. They don’t deserve a death sentence no matter what davec wants to think.

davec (profile) says:

Re: Hope I didn't disappoint

The typical davec response to this sort of observation is to whine about what would happen in an alternate scenario or universe, where the innocent wasn’t actually innocent or the cop might have been shot first if they didn’t go in all guns blazing.

Every stop a cop makes involves at least one gun. With more guns than people in the US, most stops involve more than one gun. A lot of Dodge Chargers have been stolen and of course the first thing the thief does is swap out the licenses plate so if the car and the plate don’t match there might be a nefarious reason. What this officer did wrong (besides putting in the wrong state) was caring about stopping crime. She was doing proactive policing and nobody in their right minds is doing that anymore. Why risk your life, your career, your livelihood, or your freedom when nobody else cares about law and order. Play cleanup and unless something drops in your lap, don’t get involved. This is what mayors, DA’s and activists want and they will punish anyone who tries to stop or resist a criminal.
Every year, no matter how many or how few cops there are, cops kill between 1000 and 1100 people in the US. Not sure why that is. Policies and training change but the number stays consistent. Since that number does stay pretty consistent, I would actually like to see officers doing proactive policing, but I understand why they don’t. This is a good example.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Hope I didn’t disappoint

Joke’s on you, you disappoint with every post you make. I do think it’s funny as fuck you come crawling out because you got briefly besmirched.

What this officer did wrong (besides putting in the wrong state) was caring about stopping crime

Ah yes, the good old overused “the road to hell is paved with good intentions” excuse.

Funny how ignorance of the law is no excuse when it comes to pursuing the man on the street, but when it comes to the cops it’s bloody hand-holding all the way down.

She was doing proactive policing

It’s not “proactive” anything when you key in the wrong license plate. It’s literally a wild goose chase going after the wrong vehicle.

You’ve doubled down on a lot of stupid cop shit, but literally trying to explain away fucking up someone else’s life because one of your highly trained goons apparently has problems with kindergarten-level alphabetic recognition is a new low, even for you.

That One Guy (profile) says:

‘With great power comes great responsibility… unless you’re a cop in the US in which case anyone suggesting that you act responsibly and carefully is obviously a criminal-sympathizer at best.’

It’s nice that the department is willing to actually admit that they screwed up but I am left wondering if they would be doing so without the presence of body-cam footage showing just what went down.

Peter says:

The main problem

Apart from the initial mistake, nothing the cops did was a mistake. Everything they did from pulling guns, handcuffing, terrorising innocents and putting a family one misheard command or unintentional movement a trigger pull from death, was “within policy”. No reprimands, no discipline, no sackings for the cops. Nothing.
Which means the next time you are in your car with your kids, just remember that misread plate or a typing mistake means EXACTLY the same could happen to you.

Wyrm (profile) says:

Re:

And this is exactly why I repeat this on occasion:
if criminals don’t have rights, then neither do you.

Rights are not something cops can grant or deny you at will. If “criminals” can be treated as if they don’t have rights, then it puts the whole judgement on the cop as to who benefits from said rights. Since cops way too often equate suspicion to guilt, and start acting like vigilantes instead of proper law enforcement officers, this is making them criminals and they should be treated as such.

As if that was not enough, their hierarchy often supports them, sometimes to the point of rooting out good cops speaking against this “Judge Dredd” culture. Which entitle the bad cops even more.

These bad cops need to be punished systematically. Even when, by some miracle, nobody died as the result of depriving people of their rights. Because the rights deprivation is enough of an offense.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

… [these] actions are propelled by so-called “training and expertise”

No, they’re not. Propelled by training, that is.

In this country, if you can breath in and out three times in a row without coughing up a loogie, then you too, can become a cop. Those 3 days you spent in training? They’re to ‘introduce’ you to administrative requirements like paperwork. How to shoot a gun? You should already know that, it’s pretty simiple.

In Europe, for the most part, and I was stationed in Germany for nearly 4 years, so this is my example…. Officer candidates go to an academy for 2 years! I don’t know how the schedule runs now, but 20+ year ago, they didn’t even see a street until their their or fourth month, and then it’s under the strictest of supervision that they don’t say or do anything, they’re present simply to observe. They don’t apprentice (actually perform cop-like duties) until something like the sixth or seventh month. It’s only during the final year or so that they are pretty much on their own, but there’s still a lot of reporting back on their daily activities and encounters, for refinement of their techniques, etc.

That‘s training, people, and we’d do well to emulate that structure. The first thing, and it should be obvious, is that a program like this weeds out the undesirables – they never get to see the pin-side of a badge. Second thing is, you see a cop who is both confident in his abilities and competent in the execution of those duties. No messing around, no “but I feared for my life”, no bullshit of any sort, just a simple maintenance of the public order at peace.

And that is the definition of experience.

Nimrod (profile) says:

If it weren’t so insanely easy to obtain firearms in our backward nation of morally deficient jackasses, police would likely have less reason to act out in violent fashion any time they have any sort of confrontation with “civilians”. Until we drop the “Wild West” mentality and GROW UP, we’re going to continue to have all kinds of problems like this. It’s well past time to acknowledge that our Constitution NEEDS to be subject to updates and adjustments to be able to properly regulate our society. Of course, before we can make any progress in any direction, we need to fix our corrupt political system. The first step to all of this is to establish more options. The DNC and GOP hold a virtual monopoly on our politics, and the “bipartisan” bullshit loop we’re stuck in is the natural result. They’re ALL grifters, in it together, and they’re PLAYING US for everything they can get. Our elections shouldn’t be about FUNDRAISING, they should be about the candidates explaining to us why they deserve the job, and what they plan to do with it.
Want to solve our problems?
DEFUND THE POLITICIANS. MAKE THEM EARN THE TITLE OF PUBLIC SERVANT.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...