FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Still Doesn’t Understand That Banning TikTok Doesn’t Fix The Actual Problem
from the can-we-ban-brendan-carr-instead dept
We’ve noted repeatedly how FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr doesn’t have the authority to regulate social media. And over in the sector he does actually regulate, telecom, Carr is routinely a no show. He’s been a consistent opponent of holding telecom monopolies like AT&T accountable for pretty much anything, and generally doesn’t believe government has any real role telling telecom monopolies what to do.
Those principles routinely get thrown out of the window when Carr discusses TikTok and social media. Carr’s face has been peppered across news outlets for much of the year calling for a ban of the popular social media app, and once again was rewarded with headlines via a new interview with Axios. Again, Carr calls for a complete and total ban of TikTok:
Carr highlighted concerns about U.S. data flowing back to China and the risk of a state actor using TikTok to covertly influence political processes in the United States. There simply isn’t “a world in which you could come up with sufficient protection on the data that you could have sufficient confidence that it’s not finding its way back into the hands of the [Chinese Communist Party],” Carr said.
Here’s the thing: Carr has actively opposed any and all efforts to create any meaningful privacy safeguards over the telecom, adtech, or app sectors. As a result, you could ban TikTok immediately with a giant, patriotic hammer, and the Chinese government could simply buy comparable data from a rotating array of equally dodgy adtech middlemen with zero ethical restraint and little to no oversight.
The sector Carr actually regulates, telecom, has been plagued with a parade of location data scandals showcasing how cellular carriers have repeatedly failed to protect user location data, often to devastating effect. Carr’s been largely a no show on the subject, despite its increased life and death relevance post Roe.
So again, the fixation on “banning TikTok” sounds great until you realize it’s mostly a distraction from our corruption-fueled failure on privacy legislation and consumer protection. Carr again is an absolute no show on this issue in the sector he actually regulates, and his belief (widely shared!) that banning TikTok actually fixes anything indicates he doesn’t understand how any of this works.
For literally twenty-five years we’ve ignored privacy advocates’ call for stricter consumer data safeguards and increased penalties for companies that repeatedly fail to secure data. At almost every turn we prioritized profit over security and privacy. Even when the check came due and we were bombarded with a steady parade of hacks, breaches, and various privacy scandals our solutions were largely performative.
Like most of Trumpland, Carr opposes meaningful privacy laws. Carr also opposes ensuring that privacy regulators at the FTC have the staff and resources to actually do their jobs. The entire policy approach by folks like Carr has been to generally let the biggest corporations do whatever they want, especially when it comes to the over-collection and monetization of user location, browsing, and other data.
Of course, the same broken-ass system routinely exploited by corporations was also going to be exploited by authoritarian governments. Actual privacy proponents made this point for decades.
Now, many of the same folks who helped build this greed-based, zero-accountability paradigm from the ground up want you to believe banning TikTok somehow fixes everything. But the endless hyperventilation about TikTok specifically (which is fueled in no small part by covert Facebook lobbying and in some instances just ignorant bigotry) is a distraction from our corruption-fueled failures on privacy and consumer protection more generally.
If you’re a politician professing you’re serious about consumer privacy and security, support the passage of a meaningful privacy law for the internet era, or shut up and get out of the way.
Filed Under: adtech, brendan carr, hacking, privacy, propaganda, scandals, social media, surveillance
Companies: tiktok


Comments on “FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Still Doesn’t Understand That Banning TikTok Doesn’t Fix The Actual Problem”
Brendan Carr is shouting squirrel by pointing at TikTok, in the hope that it distracts attention to his failures at the FCC,
'Privacy is a vital concern! ... For very, VERY specific companies.'
As always it’s both funny and telling how user privacy and data collection only became an issue for some people when certain companies started scooping up data, and even after that point it’s still only an issue when those specific companies are doing it.
I’m sure that Carr thinks only the US government should be spreading disinformation in the US.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Gotta Start Somewhere
If a pipe leaks in five places, then you can’t fix it everywhere simultaneously. Pick a spot to begin, preferably at the largest leak. Ban tiktok, and then see if the other data brokers want to put themselves out of business after doing one deal with the chicoms.
Re: What secret info?
I don’t understand the big deal with ANYONE having access to the TikTok data? I’m not giving them my credit card information or any real personal information. Who cares if someone in China knows that I re-watch TikTok videos of women dancing in bikinis and wood working projects? Are they going to get attractive women in bikinis to dance while working on a cabinet project to sing about the praises of voting for someone other than my usual choice of candidates?
Can someone explain to me WHY it’s an issue that China has access to TikTok information?
And for bonus points, can anyone explain to me how this would be any worse than the number of puppet regimes our own CIA has helped put into place around the world?
Re:
If the pipemaker is intentionally selling pipes that leak…
Re: no thats not it
If you choose not to fix the first 4 leaks because you like it like that and then complain about the 5th, smaller, leak then you are being disingenuous.
Re: Wrong analogy
Privacy policy in the US isn’t even close to the broken pipe analogy. It’s more like using a soaker hose to transport water instead of a regular one, with Carr complaining about 1 specific type of weed growing afterward.
Unnecessary Politicization
This article would have been stronger with the ommission of a single word: “Trumpland”. Commissioner Carr’s failure to understand what he regulates is equally repugnant regardless of which party or President appointed him, and calling that out just encourages a substantial percentage of those who might read the article to dismiss the otherwise quite valid points you are making.
Re: yes but
There is some truth to what you say, but remember also that this charade started when Trump got mad at tik tok for messing with his rally.
Re: Re:
Nah, it’s just butthurt tone policing. Which, a glance at their post history indicates, constitutes a significant portion of what I’ll generously refer to as their contribution to the site over the years.
Re:
Yes, how dare Karl unnecessarily politicize *checks notes* a government official proposing government action based on his opinions on foreign policy.
Its okay they invented a new panic.
ByteDance hired former intelligence officers to work for the company & now its implied it was done so China can learn all the secret ways we hack other countries, rather than well trained cyber experts moving into the private sector to make a living.
Just to comment
A nation that says to itself, “we are perfect”. is lying to itself when it believes an outside Nation can do something THRU the internet that harms it.
I really wonder about this nation, when the gov. relinquishes its control over the nation thru Corporate controls.
The Basics of the corporation is simple(not counting the NICE corps(there are not many). The Cheapest for the least, for the greatest profit(of any kind). And if we fail, we get the gov.(people) to pay for it(multiple times). Improvement only When it will give us 100 times the profit with fewer workers.
“using TikTok to covertly influence political processes in the United States.”
They should do it the ‘Merican way…
Blabber on Faux News.
Shame
It’s really a shame to realize this site is run by a hard-line neo-liberal.
Jackass Commissioner
Honestly, Trump said he wanted to ban it but he gave TikTok and Oracle a chance to do an acquisition. However, it was shelved by Oracle until this year. Mr.Carr is acting like an idiot cause he believes a stupid story from Buzzfeed 😂😂😂. Also, the FCC doesn’t have jurisdiction over Apps. He’s as qouted by one of my favorite late singers “Caring on and acting like a child”. Also may I point out, First he attacked Elon and then he cries about it cause he can’t get his way. Clock is ticking for his stupid retarded as, he’s busy bitching and crying about an app when he was a lawyer that failed at Karate. Trump picked him cause he felt bad. Brenden called Harvest Swathing data, what is he a fucking farmer? For love of god elon just ban him
I honestly think Brendan Carr was on Epstein Island