Omnipresent Fentanyl Copaganda Is Turning Normal Citizens Into Fainting Goats

from the sowing-fear,-harvesting-hysteria dept

For a few years now, uninformed police officials have been making America stupider by pushing the narrative that fentanyl is so dangerous, simply being near it is possibly fatal. Ignoring the fact that drugs must be ingested in some form to do what they’re supposed to do, law enforcement agencies have repeatedly made absurd, completely false claims about the dangerousness of certain drugs merely existing in proximity of responding officers.

Every year, police officers claim to have suffered near-fatal overdoses after accidentally touching fentanyl, a synthetic opioid more powerful than morphine or heroin.

“Deputy Nearly Dies of Fentanyl Overdose,” read a headline from the Sacramento Bee this summer. “Officer Exposed to Fentanyl & Transported to Local Hospital,” stated a press release from the Santa Rosa Police Department in 2020. “Police Officer Overdoses After Brushing Fentanyl Powder Off His Uniform,” read the headline on a CNN story from 2017.

These stories detail exposure to fentanyl, not ingestion. And while there are fentanyl patches that deliver the drug transdermally, the dosage is meted out over a matter of hours, not mere seconds.

These hysterical reports are often accompanied by breathless statements and “shocking” recordings of officers supposedly succumbing to an accidental overdose triggered by incidental contact. In the worst cases, these reports are accompanied by arrests for assaulting police officers, even though it was the officers “assaulting” themselves by touching drugs and succumbing to self-induced panic attacks.

Cops are being trained to respond to possible fentanyl exposure in this fashion. The training is indirect. Cops are trained to handle the drug cautiously. But the copaganda targeting fentanyl encourages them to treat, say, the expected rush of adrenaline from a drug bust as the onset of an accidental overdose. The myth perpetuates. (Dis)function follows form. Cops are fainting goats, but ones capable of triggering their own paralysis.

Ignorance is contagious. Regular people are buying into the police narrative and making themselves look just as ridiculous as the law enforcement officials incorrecting the public about the dangers of fentanyl.

A pit stop in Bellevue took a terrifying turn for a Kentucky family Sunday night.

Renee Parsons said she picked up a dollar bill off the ground at the McDonald’s on Highway 70 and soon passed out.

[…]

It was only a matter of minutes after picking up the dollar bill that Renee Parsons felt as though she couldn’t breathe and her body began to feel numb.

“I couldn’t even breathe. It’s almost like a burning sensation, if you will, that starts here at your shoulders, and then it just goes down because it’s almost like it’s numbing your entire body,” Parsons explained.

Her husband then rushed Renee to the hospital. He also supposedly experienced some side effects (apparently from being near someone in the throes of an alleged fentanyl overdose). The couple also said their son experienced some minor symptoms. Renee Parsons was released.

Apparently no fentanyl was found in her system, but she and her husband feel it’s the science that’s wrong, not their unsupported suspicions.

The family says the toxicology report doesn’t test for synthetic drugs, but they feel confident fentanyl or a similar drug was on the money.

Never mind the professionals. Here’s all the evidence anyone needs.

Justin Parsons is now convinced his wife had a reaction to some sort of drug, he thinks fentanyl, that was on that dollar bill she picked up.

“I worked in law enforcement for 10 or 12 years and I observed a couple of incidents like this and it was very similar,” he said.

Well… maybe don’t ask every law enforcement professional. Otherwise, the narrative might not hold up.

According to the police department, the [responding] officer asked Parsons if she had received a clinical drug called Narcan, a lifesaving medication given to counter the effects of narcotic overdose. Parsons told the officer she didn’t receive Narcan.

The officer inspected the dollar bill and didn’t see any residue on it that would indicate the presence of a drug. Mumford said the dollar bill was disposed of without being tested, because there was no evidence that a crime had been committed.

“It was the officer’s opinion that this would not have been have been a fentanyl overdose,” Mumford said in a phone interview with Snopes.

Medical experts, researchers, and actual professionals in the drug field (as opposed to those solely in the business of busting drug dealers and users) all agree: what’s described in instances like these is almost impossible.

“You cannot overdose just by touching fentanyl or another opioid and you cannot overdose just by being around it,” said Dr Ryan Marino, medical director of Toxicology & Addiction at University Hospitals, Cleveland. “It will not get into the air and cause anyone to overdose.”

Don’t trust this doctor? Here’s some actual research backed by actual science:

[I]ncidental dermal absorption is unlikely to cause opioid toxicity. If bilateral palmar surfaces were covered with fentanyl patches, it would take ∼14 min to receive 100 mcg of fentanyl (using a body surface area of 17,000 cm2, palm surface area of 0.5%, and fentanyl absorption of 2.5 mcg/cm2/h. This extreme example illustrates that even a high dose of fentanyl prepared for transdermal administration cannot rapidly deliver a high dose.

The above calculation is based on fentanyl patch data, which overestimates the potential exposure from drug in tablet or powder form in several ways. Drug must have sufficient surface area and moisture to be efficiently absorbed. Medicinal transdermal fentanyl utilizes a matrix designed to optimize delivery, whereas tablets and powder require dissolution for absorption. Relatedly, powdered drug sits on the skin, whereas patches have adhesive to hold drug in close proximity to the skin allowing both to remain moist. Finally, the above quoted figure 2.5 mcg/cm2/h represents delivery at steady state after drug has penetrated the dermis, which overestimates the amount of absorption in the first few minutes of dermal exposure. This initial period is of most relevance in unintentional exposure, because fentanyl that is observed on skin can be rapidly removed by mechanical (brushing) means or cleansing with water. Therefore, based on our current understanding of the absorption of fentanyl and its analogs, it is very unlikely that small, unintentional skin exposures to tablets or powder would cause significant opioid toxicity, and if toxicity were to occur, it would not develop rapidly, allowing time for removal.

Here’s more, from Lewis Nelson, the director of the Division of Medical Toxicology at Rutgers Medical School:

There is clear evidence that passive exposure to fentanyl does not result in clinical toxicity. Descriptions of the signs and symptoms of those who have supposedly experienced passive toxicity vary widely. They include dizziness, blurry vision, pallor, weakness, sweatiness, high blood pressure, chest pain, heart palpitations, anxiety, and occasionally seizure-like activity. These findings are usually transient and resolve on their own, often far faster than would be expected, and are incompatible with the known duration of the drug’s effect. What’s more, they aren’t consistent with the signs and symptoms of opioid poisoning — the triad of slowed breathing, decreased consciousness, and pinpoint pupils.

It’s not like this information hasn’t been out there for years. The previous two quotes come from articles/research that were published in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Every time a story like this makes the rounds, it is immediately debunked. And yet the cop narrative (now being carried forward by ex-cop spouses) — that fentanyl in any amount, engaged with in almost any way, can result in an overdose — continues to thrive. Facts just can’t compete with viral stories or law enforcement’s proprietary take on incidental fentanyl contact.

Cops are constantly told to engage in irrational fear. Irresponsible media outlets that uncritically circulate law enforcement’s false assertions and some rando’s colorful story about tainted dollar bills are making everyone stupider, ensuring there will always be more stories like these in the future.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Omnipresent Fentanyl Copaganda Is Turning Normal Citizens Into Fainting Goats”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
41 Comments
Naughty Autie says:

“You cannot overdose just by touching fentanyl or another opioid and you cannot overdose just by being around it,” said Dr Ryan Marino, medical director of Toxicology & Addiction at University Hospitals, Cleveland. “It will not get into the air and cause anyone to overdose.”

Oh, that’s a shame. I know a guy who has heroin, and now I have to actually smoke it and risk my job. 😉

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re:

“Obviously because patients are given the proper therapeutic dosage by their doctors which doesn’t kill you.”

Well, that and the fact that it exists. Unless you’re trying to say that whoever dropped the dollar bill was using a version of it that it can kill at a fractions of the dosage, but is at the same time so weak that it doesn’t show up in tests?

yo says:

Well yes and no. Somewhere in the discussion on Fentanyl what has been lost is that there is a lot of crap called Carfentanil coming over from China that is way worse than Fentanyl and that’s what is causing the reactions by first responders in a lot of cases.

As an EMT I had to take continuing ed credits and one of those seminars I went to recently was given by an ER doctor talking about the Carfentanil stuff that has affected a number of first responders and ER doctors. The problem is the powder form is in small packets so responders and doctors have to be careful not to unknowingly cut through a packet and get a snoot full of it because it’s so potent that a tiny amount is far beyond a therapeutic dose and potentially debilitating.

“https://www.dea.gov/press-releases/2016/09/22/dea-issues-carfentanil-warning-police-and-public”

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Even so, can you provide an estimate of how many first responders who were actually affected by it?

The DEA announcement was issued in 2015, and I really am suspicious that cops, EMTs and the like don’t have a box of disposable latex gloves at least, or preferably, protocols to deal with this, though American Law Enforcement continues to surprise me with their lax attitude to serving and protecting…

Anon says:

But... but...

Isn’t the whole point – from what I’ve read by a few recovering drug addicts – the whole point of these opioid-type drugs is that they give you a rush not unlike a powerful orgasm but much longer lasting, which is why addicts keep taking them and keep looking for more. So “dizzy and fainting” without the accompanying initial burst of endorphin-receptor euphoria still sounds like the placebo effect from copaganda, as the article says.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

I have opioid hypersensitivity, and can confirm that what I experienced when I was prescribed basic ones (oral dihydrocodeine) for pain relief before they realised I should not be given them, was that around 45m+ after ingestion, I begin to experience drowsiness, and breathing difficulty, vision starts to go with the reduced oxygen, followed by passing out, with assistance required to keep my airway clear. I don’t really have any pleasant memories of the experience, I don’t know if the same dodgy metabolic pathways which make me sensitive to the stuff also blunts the euphoric effect (I cannot enjoy them but they will kill me, figures), but I can absolutely say that my body was physically incapable of a panic response. The depressed heart rate and blood pressure of my experience are definitely contrary to the elevated levels found in these {most likely} panic attacks.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

There is clear evidence that passive exposure to fentanyl does not result in clinical toxicity. Descriptions of the signs and symptoms of those who have supposedly experienced passive toxicity vary widely. They include dizziness, blurry vision, pallor, weakness, sweatiness, high blood pressure, chest pain, heart palpitations, anxiety, and occasionally seizure-like activity. These findings are usually transient and resolve on their own, often far faster than would be expected, and are incompatible with the known duration of the drug’s effect. What’s more, they aren’t consistent with the signs and symptoms of opioid poisoning — the triad of slowed breathing, decreased consciousness, and pinpoint pupils.

In other words, symptoms consistent with a panic attack, the opposite of all the ones you’d expect from an overdose.

nasch (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

National Cancer Institute:

https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/nocebo-effect

A New Zealand medical authority:

https://medsafe.govt.nz/profs/PUArticles/March2019/The%20nocebo%20effect.htm

A paper about “the nocebo effect” on an NIH site:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804316/

I could go on, but in short “nocebo response” may be more correct, but “nocebo effect” is not incorrect and is in wide use in the field.

Raziel says:

Re: Re: Re:2

I’ve been Googling and Autie is right. Wikipedia says:

In a placebo-controlled clinical trial any change in the control group is known as the placebo response, and the difference between this and the result of no treatment is the placebo effect.

So the individual’s symptoms of “overdose” are indeed a nocebo response, not a nocebo effect.

Anonymous Coward says:

If it’s so damn strong, why do I know guys who used to use fentanyl, and why are they still alive? And why did they bother injecting it if such small quantities can cause overdose so easily via transdermal absorption?

The entire narrative falls apart the second any actual critical thought is applied. Unfortunately, thinking critically about the police is often fatal in the US…

John85851 (profile) says:

The bigger issue is "I just know"

The guy’s wife wasn’t poisoned because the drug doesn’t get absorbed that fast, yet people go along with him because “he just knows”. Why do we go along with it? Why aren’t we calling these people out as frauds? At the very least, the media should be saying, sorry for what you went through, but we’re not going to publish the story because it’s as much junk science as a flat earth.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...