Trump's DOJ Still Pretending Everything Has An 'Interstate' Nexus To Throw Federal Charges At Protester

from the last-ditch-attempt-to-make-people-pay-for-disrespecting-cops dept

The Trump Administration’s desire to turn protests against police brutality into an antifa conspiracy have failed. But not for a lack of trying. Federal officers have been sent to major cities still experiencing unrest, but arrest data and DOJ press releases show there’s very little evidence that coordinated groups of anarchists are behind the violence and property destruction witnessed around the nation. Instead, it appears to be a loose assortment of white dudes who’ve spent too much time talking themselves up on social media.

Why the government of a free nation would direct its efforts at rooting out anti-fascists is beyond me, but efforts continue to be made. To justify their own existence, federal officers handling protests are turning regular riot crime into federal riot crime. Prosecutors are pursuing federal charges when state charges are perfectly capable of handling arrestees — all in hopes of vindictively adding years to their sentences.

There are, of course, First Amendment implications to these federal efforts. This has been demonstrated before, with the feds’ attempts to toss a bunch of inauguration day protesters in the slam for an extended period of time. These were the first protests prosecuted under Trump, and the prosecutions went nowhere even as federal officers attempted to go everywhere. The government issued broad subpoenas and warrants and accused the people it failed to prosecute of “hiding behind the First Amendment.”

This perceived “hiding” behind inalienable rights continues to aggravate Trump’s DOJ. The efforts — which began with the pretty-fucking-fascist act of protesters being spirited away for questioning by unidentified officers driving unmarked vehicles — continue. As The Intercept reports, feds are leveraging their prosecutorial discretion to inflict maximum pain on people who have a beef with their public servants. All it takes is the use of social media to turn state crimes into federal crimes. The same goes for targeting any recipient of federal funds, which includes nearly every local law enforcement agency.

The head of the Prosecution Project (which is tracking government prosecutions of demonstrators) says the federal government is using the existence of the internet to amp up charges against protesters.

“More than mass arrests, we see over 300 cases of selective prosecution by the feds against demonstrators,” [Michael] Loadenthal said. He added that the government has made “extensive use” of “interstate crimes” to transform state charges into federal ones, thus bringing more protest cases into the Justice Department’s remit.


Eighty-six of the 300-plus individual federal cases identified by the Prosecution Project included an “interstate” modification. The scope appears near unbounded for what can fall under federal jurisdiction.

With enough imagination, setting fire to an NYPD cruiser is a federal crime. Why? Because, as prosecutors explained to a nonplussed job, the NYPD’s use of federal funds turns regular arson into “arson involving interstate commerce.” So does merely enforcing laws — including federal ones. Prosecutors have argued in court that the NYPD’s involvement in law enforcement turns regular crimes into federal crimes when they’re targeted by rioters.

In another arson indictment, this time against New Yorker Samantha Shader, federal prosecutors stated that since the “activities of the NYPD and the New York City government in enacting and enforcing laws also affect interstate commerce,” the case fell under the federal government’s purview. Shader, accused of throwing a molotov cocktail at an NYPD vehicle, could face up to 20 years in prison.

In Utah, another federal prosecutor claimed there was a federal nexus to another police car fire, pointing to the fact the vehicle had been manufactured in Canada.

If you think it can’t get any stupider than that, you haven’t met Trump’s DOJ.

In perhaps the most striking example, a Black Lives Matter protester in Jacksonville, Florida, was indicted on federal firearms charges when he was detained by police, and a Patron tequila bottle, allegedly converted into a Molotov cocktail, was found in his bag. The indictment states that since Patron products are exclusively produced in Mexico, “the Patron bottle” — described as a firearm — “would have traveled in and affected interstate or foreign commerce.”

It’s only a matter of time before “sounds Mexican” becomes the lynchpin for a federal prosecution. This case was dismissed before the DOJ’s bad faith argument could be ridiculed by a judge, leaving the agency free to engage in further imaginative extrapolations.

Bill Barr will still be running the DOJ shop at least through the end of this year. Protests are sure to accompany election results and the long-running anti-police brutality protests in several cities aren’t suddenly going to stop, no matter who wins the election. The stupidity will continue through the end of the year at least. And it’s a stupidity that’s going to destroy people’s lives to satisfy a vindictive presidential administration that chose to unconditionally support law enforcement even when it’s clearly in the wrong.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump's DOJ Still Pretending Everything Has An 'Interstate' Nexus To Throw Federal Charges At Protester”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Not even trying to hide the vindictive corruption

‘They used a product made in another country, therefore it counts as interstate related and falls under federal charges.’

As arguments go that one is so insane that any judge that buys it is clearly massively corrupt and needs to be removed from the position or so mentally impaired that they should be removed from the job as well, and as for the lawyer making that argument immediate disbarment seems entirely appropriate for the same reasons.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Not even trying to hide the vindictive corruption

As arguments go that one is so insane… and as for the lawyer making that argument…

Mr Justice Sutherland’s opinion in Berger v United States (1935) is chiefly remembered for its passage which begins—

The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. . . .

That passage goes on to contain the often-quoted bit, “While he [the United States Attorney] may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones.”

It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one.

In 1935, those sentiments could be uttered in all seriousness — in an opinion of the highest court in the land.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: In 1935

Yet in 1931 an IRS special investigation bent the law into a paper-clip sculpture to get Al Capone for tax evasion by magically extending the statute of limitations. This extraordinary adjustment which allowed the court to convict and imprison Capone was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States.

It makes one want to tear off half his face and start flipping a (double-headed) coin.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 In 1935

"But then, he was hit on the head with a brick, so what can you expect?"

Only that he’s provided the exculpation for the court? Judge Wilkerson may have heard the case but it was Pharaoh Roy Bean who swung the gavel on Capone?

Which leaves Agent Wilson under suspicion of repeatedly bludgeoning a US judge with a brick. Something to bear in mind so hopefully all DoJ personnel are relieved of blunt objects before entering any courtroom, or before being left alone with people of the judiciary.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

"Interstate commerce" excuses: This isn't new

This has been A Thing at least since 1942, where Roscoe Filburn got slapped down by the supreme court for feeding his own chickens wheat he grew himself.

So yeah. Under existing precedent they may have a valid argument. If the district court judge buys it, then it would likely have to go through a pro-forma appeals court fight and then to the supreme court. Whee!

Nope, don’t like it. But nope, not rich enough to contest it meself.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: "Interstate commerce" excuses: This isn't new

I hadn’t heard of this case — that’s crazy that they successfully argued that because he grew his own wheat and didn’t have to buy from others that he was at fault.

Anyway, I find Roberts to be disingenuous in how he used this precedent in the ACA fight. The inactivity of not buying health care is the same inactivity of not buying wheat. The activity of growing your own wheat to feed to your own chickens is on par with a person working out, eating right, and wearing a bicycle helmet. To compare the activity of the one with the inactivity of the other is to make a hugely false comparison.

When did it become standard that our judges have no real-life experience and have the mental reasoning capacity of a middle-school truant?

Anonymous Coward says:

If you think it can’t get any stupider than that, you haven’t met Trump’s DOJ.

If you think we didn’t reach peak stupidity re: interstate nexuses long ago, see Wickard v. Filburn (1942):

"Whether the subject of the regulation in question was ‘production’, ‘consumption’, or ‘marketing’ is, therefore, not material for purposes of deciding the question of federal power before us…. But even if appellee’s activity be local and though it may not be regarded as commerce, it may still, whatever its nature, be reached by Congress if it exerts a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce and this irrespective of whether such effect is what might at some earlier time have been defined as ‘direct’ or ‘indirect.’"

In other words: non-commercial activity occurring entirely within one state can count as "interstate commerce" if it could potentially affect interstate commerce in the smallest way. I.e., everything’s interstate commerce. Later opinions such as Gonzales v. Raich have reaffirmed this.

If I protest locally, that’s one less theoretical interstate protester that needs to be hired. Interstate commerce, QED. The molotov cocktail at least involves an actual interstate object, dumb as it is.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Doesn't anyone study COIN anymore?

Throwing protesters — even violent ones — into federal prison for twenty years only fuels the Rebel Alliance recruitment effort. It also escalates non-violence into violence, and petty violence into full on terrorism.

The occupying German garrison routinely executed saboteurs for slashing tires and cutting phone lines, and that had the effect of multiplying the numbers of La Résistance, getting them organized and moving up to assassinations and explosive sabotage.

Anonymous Coward says:

Don't forget the Amish beard cutting hate crime

This was one sect of Amish cutting the beards of other Amish and the federal govt got involved and prosecuted the beard cutters under federal hate crime laws because the clippers they used to cut the beards traveled across state lines and, thus, provided the nexus to interstate commerce. This was back in 2013.

At some point, one hopes that someone might admit that the commerce clause has swallowed the Constitution’s limited powers.

nasch (profile) says:

Re: Don't forget the Amish beard cutting hate crime

At some point, one hopes that someone might admit that the commerce clause has swallowed the Constitution’s limited powers.

Lots of people have recognized that, but at this point it would take a constitutional amendment or a Supreme Court willing to go back on its precedents to fix the situation.

David says:

Don't knock fascism

The efforts — which began with the pretty-fucking-fascist act of protesters being spirited away for questioning by unidentified officers driving unmarked vehicles — continue.

Secret police is not inherently fascist but was a standard tool of various usually totalitarian regimes in Europe centuries before fascism as a formal ideology subjugating individual rights below regime or "national" interests became a thing. Sort of a hen-and-egg thing.

And yes, I also find "tragic" is a word that gets stretched beyond recognition these days. Makes it hard to meaningfully apply it where it actually fits.

Bartonswb (user link) says:

how to tell if a chinese girl likes you

5 Ways Parents can certainly help Their Kids

News World Report Annual Ranking of Diets Medicare Seeks to Cut Drug Costs for People in Part D Plans New MRI Technique helps Spot MS Sooner New Medication Approved for Sickle Cell Disease Omicron Is Here:

Experts Community support groups WebMD Blogs News Center Dr. Whyte’s get: take control of Your Cancer Risk

Featured Topics In Memoriam WebMD Loses Cherished Leader Kristy Hammam Get Our Newsletters Health facts and information, ship to Your Inbox

Mobile Apps monthly subscriptions Privacy and More

january. 6, 2022 With the appearance of the Omicron variant, these aren’t easy days for parents, for the children, Or for anyone who is trying to puzzle out what’s best when it comes to the very simple act of attending school.

As you’ve seen, One day your small kid could be on the school bus heading to school, The next testing positive for COVID 19 and being forced to quarantine for days. It’s a dizzying time of stress, constant worry, And confusion that is taken its toll.

There are things we can do to become proficient, she says. First is to take the a pause.

"It’s quite simple to be reactionary in what we do and <a href=>how to know if a chinese girl likes you</a> for things to escalate, Bonior shows.

preferably, she says, Think through your actions and recognize that the uncertainty surrounding us has everyone at a heightened state of alert.

or, While parents are very stressed right now, It’s crucial for you to be available to your kids. at some point, they have been navigating 2 plus years of a pandemic and may find this overwhelming virus surge scarier than you realize.

To help parents help their kids weather today and the changing times ahead, WebMD asked Steven Meyers, phd, A professor and chair of psychology at Roosevelt college in Chicago, For the five things parents want to do now:

1: Give kids the right informationDepending on how old you child is, Tailor a message about the Omicron surge that’s commendable.

"Given the uncertainty and untrue stories out there, It’s hard for moms and dads to navigate this terrain, So just ponder how hard it is on your kids, Meyers predicts.

Keep the message clear about how the whole family can stay safe and define what acceptable risk means.

"as an example, he says, "If you have a relative who is immunocompromised, That risk will look different than if your family is young and healthy. The threat level will vary, And this is really great to keep in mind because being COVID positive will have different impacts on people’s lives, Depending on everyone’s all around health,

2: Lean into the unknowableInstead of acting like you’re certain of it all, Explain to your kids that the facts about the Omicron variant are developing as we learn searching for about it.

"Parents should explain that science is constantly changing, And as we discover, The concepts and decisions will change, much too, Meyers pronounces.

"When we’re plagued, We possess a rely on safe versus unsafe, Right rather than wrong. But we have to get used to the notion that where we are right now with this pandemic, The guidance will almost certainly keep changing just as the spread and the risk will keep changing,

3: Discuss what safety means to everyoneIf you child says they don’t wish to go to school due to the risk of catching COVID, enjoy their concerns.

"Then calmly explain that you’ve followed vaccine guidelines and that it is critical to be as safe as possible, subject to his or her age and when he or she got their vaccine and booster, Meyers predicts. "within mind that each person in your family will have a very individual reaction to a situation like this and will have different worries and concerns,

4: watch out for anxiety warning signsAs parents know, Kids right now are facing considerable stress and panic about the pandemic and are fatigued from 2 years of this.

"particularly among teens, Some will keep their fears to themselves, while other people will let them leak out through less productive channels, Such as mistaken social media postings, issues, Stomachaches, Or an inability to sleep, Meyers predicts. "It’s key for parents to play close attention to these signs of anxiety and keep the lines of communicating open,

5: Help your child rethink FOMOWhen teens see Instagram stories featuring their friends partying and gathering in large groups right now, The fear of at a disadvantage or FOMO is real.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
13:30 A Reagan Judge, The First Amendment, And The Eternal War Against Pornography (63)
12:27 Yelp Asks Court To Stop Texas AG Ken Paxton From Suing Them For Warning Users That Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Scams (51)
13:20 'Porn' Is A Human Right (58)
11:54 American Library Association Data Shows The Party Of Free Speech Is Doing More Than Ever To Silence Speech (83)
10:40 5th Circuit Decides To Rehear Jawboning Case Involving Disinfo Researchers, Realizes It Can't Do That Yet, Changes Mind Hours Later (8)
10:56 Federal Judge Says Fuck The 1st Amendment While Upholding Public University's Drag Show Ban (91)
10:39 White House, States Try To Convince Supreme Court In Jawboning Case (73)
20:09 Delaware State Police Pay $50,000 To Man Troopers Ticketed For Flipping Them Off (23)
09:36 Supreme Court Puts 5th Circuit Ruling On Biden Admin Jawboning Of Social Media Companies On Hold For Shadow Docket Review (41)
10:45 New Jersey Appeals Court Says Even Some Forms Of Harassment Are Protected Speech (27)
13:38 Another Day, Another SLAPP Threat From A ‘Wellness’ Influencer Against Someone Reviewing Their ‘Masterclass’ (16)
09:31 5th Circuit Cleans Up District Court’s Silly Jawboning Ruling About the Biden Admin, Trims It Down To More Accurately Reflect The 1st Amendment (40)
09:27 Court Tosses Arkansas Age Verification Law For Violating The 1st Amendment (16)
15:20 Texas Ruling Shows You Can't Regulate Online Pornography Like A Public Health Crisis (25)
13:30 Court Says Texas’ Adult Content Age Verification Law Clearly Violates The 1st Amendment (35)
12:50 State Governments Can't Resist The Siren Song Of Censorship (81)
10:50 Fifth Circuit Denies Immunity To Detective Who Arrested A Man For A Satirical Facebook Post (21)
12:44 Montana’s Response To Lawsuits Over Laughably Unconstitutional TikTok Ban Is To Say That TikTok Is The Equivalent Of ‘Cancer-Causing Radio’ (19)
09:25 ‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Elon Musk Suggests He’s Going To Sue George Soros… For His Free Speech Advocating For Certain Laws (129)
10:47 Jordan's King Approves Bill That Criminalizes Online Anonymity, Publication Of Police Officers Names/Photos (14)
10:58 Kansas Cops Raid Small Town Newspaper In Extremely Questionable 'Criminal Investigation' (26)
09:22 Tennessee Teen Sues School For Suspending Him After He Posted Memes Mocking His Principal (15)
11:57 ‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Elon Musk Files Obvious SLAPP Suit Against Non-Profit Critic (49)
10:58 Prime Minister's Brother Latest Victim Of Singapore's 'Fake News' Law (5)
13:45 Court: Injunction Blocking Florida's Anti-Drag Law Applies To Everyone Affected By It, Not Just Venue That Sued It (35)
09:31 How Would The GOP Feel If Democrats In Congress Demanded Details Regarding How Fox News Or The NY Post Made Editorial Decisions? (267)
10:46 Republican AGs Decide That Coercive Jawboning Is Good, Actually (When They Do It) (28)
10:49 Ninth Circuit Dumps Oregon's 'Surreptitious Recording' Law, Handing A First Amendment Win To Project Veritas (35)
10:52 In 303 Creative, By Happily Helping One Bigot, SCOTUS (Perhaps Inadvertently) Helped The Larger Fight Against Bigotry (168)
09:24 EU And Elon Battle Over The New Internet Regulations That Elon Himself Endorsed Last Year (14)
More arrow