AT&T Fires Hundreds Of DC, HBO Execs In Latest Example Of 'Merger Synergies'

from the Do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept

This may be shocking to hear, but nearly all of the promises AT&T made in the lead up to its $86 billion merger with Time Warner wound up not being true.

The company’s promise that the deal wouldn’t result in price hikes for consumers? False. The company’s promise the deal wouldn’t result in higher prices for competitors needing access to essential AT&T content like HBO? False. AT&T’s promise they wouldn’t hide Time Warner content behind exclusivity paywalls? False. The “$15 TV service” the company repeatedly hyped as a byproduct of the deal? Already discontinued. The idea that the merger would somehow create more jobs at the company? False.

AT&T has laid off 41,000 employees just since it received its 2017, $42 billion tax cut from the Trump administration for doing absolutely nothing (technically, less than nothing, since it fired countless employees and trimmed 2020 CAPEX by around $3 billion). And this week, the company laid off another 600 employees across Time Warner, including employees at HBO and DC Comics:

“The moves are likely to cause anxiety at WarnerMedia, which has reorganized several areas of its business since being acquired by AT&T for about $85 billion in 2018. Since AT&T took over the company formerly known as Time Warner, top executives with years of oversight of distribution, programming and advertising sales have departed. Kilar?s ascension to the CEO role in May has only served to fuel more recalibration.”

Granted if you’ve watched the history of U.S. media and telecom consolidation, this should surprise nobody. The first year or two after such deals are usually filled with empty promises about how “nothing will change” (AT&T brass repeatedly promised Time Warner employees they would have ample resources and creative freedom), only to be followed up by everything changing, and, as is the case when a lumbering telecom monopoly jumps more fully into a creative business it doesn’t fully understand, often not for the better.

And while AT&T has hinted that much of this had to do with COVID-19, that’s not the case. Most of these moves were either planned for some time, or part of the company’s ongoing attempts to shed the massive debt accumulated from the company’s spending spree on DirecTV (2015) and Time Warner (2018). Both mergers were supposed to position AT&T as a dominant player in the online video and advertising space. Instead, AT&T has been losing paying TV customers hand over fist after a number of bungled decisions ranging from price hikes on price sensitive cord cutters to bungled streaming branding.

It was yet another example of the perils of a “growth for growth’s sake” mindset, blended with yet another example of how lumbering, government-pampered telecom monopolies like AT&T and Verizon just aren’t very good at this whole competition and innovation thing.

AT&T’s repeated missteps were bad enough that they resulted in an investor backlash, the “retirement” of former AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson, and a newfound focus on firing more people than ever to recover debt. As is often the case, lower and mid-level management has to pay the cost for years of higher level managerial dysfunction. As is also often the case, the majority of press outlets that were eager to parrot AT&T’s pre-merger promises are utterly absent when it comes time to tally the human cost of mindless merger mania.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: at&t, dc comics, hbo, time warner

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “AT&T Fires Hundreds Of DC, HBO Execs In Latest Example Of 'Merger Synergies'”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
17 Comments
Pixelation says:

The swamp is as full as ever

In a US where our regulators and congresscritters weren’t bought and paid for by AT&T, they would be required to pay the taxes they weaseled out of for doing shit like this. Instead, re-election coffers are brimming with cash and there is now an extra ~$3 billion to use for future payoffs.

Well Mr Trump, no comment? Shocking.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Koby (profile) says:

Basic Economics

Granted if you’ve watched the history of U.S. media and telecom consolidation, this should surprise nobody

If you paid attention in economics, this should surprise nobody. This is the entire point behind mergers and consolidations. It removes competition, and allows for a single company to eliminate jobs with duplicate functions. Any judge who believed otherwise to approve the merger was a real dupe.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

This should result in the dissolution of the merger right?

If there were any repercussions to failing to live up to the merger requirements like a real government would hold them too, then we would be seeing ATT being sold off to the highest bidder right now and all kinds of restrictions and requirements for anyone who purchased those pieces. The public is losing out due to the laughable terms and the lack of power to enforce them. If a company is too big to fail, it is too large to exist in the first place and should be hacked apart until it no longer risks a collapse of the economy when it inevitably fails.

nasch (profile) says:

Re: This should result in the dissolution of the merger right?

The public is losing out due to the laughable terms

What I don’t understand is these terms where the company agrees not to do X or Y (raise prices, lay off employees, whatever it is) for 3 years or 5 or 7. Why is it a problem for them to do those things right away, but it’s fine if they wait a while? Is it just because nobody involved actually cares about the issues and just want to wait for press coverage to go away?

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

HBO

Obviously, the first thing one must do after purchasing a goose that lays golden eggs is to run a few experiments. Maybe it doesn’t need to eat as much… or at all! Sure the gold’s valuable, but you can make it more valuable if you don’t have to spend any money on the goose’s upkeep.

I applaud the brilliant business genius of AT&T and their righteous crusade to stop HBO from being so wasteful.

Anonymous Coward says:

Thats the system in the usa mergers between corporations reduce competition,
it results in higher prices for consumers.
america needs at least 2-3 broadband providers in every state .and 3 mobile telecom companys to provide competition.
theres no sign of this happening in a time when millions of people need fast broadband to work from home.
Politicians and regulators need to rethink the whole system for regulating
telecom and broadband providers for any hope of things getting better.
att buying media corporations is a disaster since they have little experience of offering good consumer service or competing in the market place.
Instead the rely on buying out possible competing companys or
buying out regulators .

Smartassicus the Roman says:

Yeah, But,

Who’s the bigger fool, the fool, or the fool who follows him?

I’d like to think that nobody is this stupid so it all boils down to this being the plan from the start, which is far more likely. I’m wondering how many politicians and politicians’ friends got perks and cushy vacations out of back room deals to make this happen.

"The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers".

ECA (profile) says:

why is this interesting.

If I gave you enough money, I could make you do anything.. With enough money, would you be a willing slave?

Its a thought, that it would have been great, if that money from the sale had to goto the Shareholders, even if to only buy back the shares. BEFORE it went into the top .1% of people AT the company.
But considering They allow Different types of stock in a company, and those given to consumers give very little..

Lets go back abit, and think about HOw they used to be affected, by major investment. That the wages on top would go down abit for a time to pay off the investment, but You would also get more Stockholders, to balance things out abit. By the time it was getting paid off, the wages on top would reflect that as well as increase, with the increase in profits.

It was always fun reading papers and watching news as our gov, kept trying to track all the money, and get its share. But now there isnt much to share as they keep cutting the tax to nothing.

Anyone understand the problem with to much money going around, and a state/fed that wishes to get a share? Look at detroit and the older Manufacturing locations. People were making good money and spending it. Taxes went up as the city Thought they needed more to do more, and ended up PAYING more for services that USED to be allot cheaper, and then the State wages went up(at the top) and then Detroit Died, and the taxes are now so high, who gets to pay? So the people left, it was to expensive. And Now the state has to figure out how to LOWER top wages..

With all the games in economics, its amazing that there IS NO BALANCE..

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...