LinkedIn Is Helping The Chinese Government Silence Critics

from the maybe-people-will-start-paying-attention-to-their-notifications-NOW dept

The social networks of the world aren’t doing much to make the world a better place. Facilitating communications across borders is great — a definite net gain for the world’s citizens. But these platforms insist on distributing globally while thinking locally, making their operations subject to censorial governments in the countries where they do business.

Facebook’s refusal to stand up to various authoritarian governments arguably made it an accessory to the fact in genocide. Twitter tends to sit back and let Turkey’s government vanish away criticism of President Erdogan and his actions. Google appears to be one of the few companies responsive to the Chinese government’s demands for content deletion, which is probably due to its ability to get past the country’s Great Firewall as well as its temporarily suspended construction of a Chinese government-controlled search engine.

One social network rarely appears in these discussions, most likely because few people actually see it as a social network. LinkedIn — the de facto adult in the world of social networking — is also giving China what it wants when it wants it.

LinkedIn censored the profile and activities of a vocal critic of the Chinese government for users in China, in another apparent response to a censorship request from the government.

Corporate fraud investigator Peter Humphrey, who is British and lives in the UK, was informed by LinkedIn in December that his profile had been censored in China, but after being asked about it by BuzzFeed News this week, LinkedIn restored the page and said it had only been blocked in error.

It comes days after LinkedIn censored the page of a pro-democracy activist in China before also later restoring it after a wave of negative publicity.

LinkedIn is one of the only American social media services to be warmly welcomed on the other side of the Great Firewall. Consequently, this means it actually has something to report about China and its demands for content removal in its transparency reports. So far, the censorship plan is working… with an assist from LinkedIn.

LinkedIn is trying to have it both ways. It’s complying with China’s demands and saying things about having to follow the laws of the country it’s doing business in, as it did in a message to Peter Humphrey about his account suspension. (Screenshot at this link.)

While we strongly support freedom of expression, we recognized when we launched that we would need to adhere to the requirements of the Chinese government in order to operate in China.

Then, when the heat comes down, LinkedIn is trying to pretend its proxy censorship was just a mistake.

Asked why Humphrey’s profile had been removed in China, Nicole Leverich, a spokesperson for LinkedIn, said an internal review found the profile was “blocked in error.” It has now been restored for users in China, she said.

“Our Trust and Safety team is updating our internal processes to help prevent an error like this from happening again,” she added.

Swell, if that is what’s actually going to happen going forward. But China is batting 9-for-9 in takedowns so far, which seems to indicate the review process kicks in only after people start complaining, rather than when LinkedIn receives requests from the Chinese government.

While it makes things easier to abide by local laws when offering services in other countries, companies shouldn’t be in any hurry to indulge censorship just because locals laws enable the silencing of criticism and dissent.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: linkedin, microsoft

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “LinkedIn Is Helping The Chinese Government Silence Critics”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

corporate responsibility is a fine thing, but are you suggesting that they only pay attention to laws that you or I like?

We are many many years away from any unified view on how we as a people should live. That a lot of us agree on this topic does not make it the only, or even the right way.

If a corporation wants to do business somewhere, it should adhere *any* laws that are applicable, just like anyone else.

The only choice corporations can make is to not do business somewhere. (well they could also bribe the right persons… but most places have laws against that too)

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

If a corporation wants to do business somewhere, it should adhere any laws that are applicable, just like anyone else.

“If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go; perchance it will wear smooth,—certainly the machine will wear out. If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.” — Henry David Thoreau, Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience)

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Almost as though it's not there...

Yeah, if you could point me to the part where I said or even implied ‘laws in other countries don’t apply because US law trumps them’, rather than ‘oppressive laws in any country are bad, and companies are not guiltless for deciding that being an instrument of those laws is an acceptable price to pay’, that’d be great, because my browser seems to be on the fritz and doesn’t seem to be showing that part of my comment.

Drunk Uncle Sam says:

Re: Re:

“We are many many years away from any unified view on how we as a people should live.”

And who is it that will make this decision for us? I look forward to the day when our benevolent overlords tell us how to live our lives to the most minuscule details because we are all just too stupid to know any better. We all need mommy government looking over our shoulders at all times because we lack the personal responsibilities.

Amirite?

Mincher Schnauzer says:

Either corporations are persons with Rights to do as want...

OR they’re fictions, mere machinery that’s to serve human interests.

In this piece you’re arguing the latter — because that’s your actual view, practically inevitable as a human, even Masnick has stated it, while if were writing to spec to put over your more frequent "corporation-uber-alles" position, then you’d regard LinkedIn as a "person" which should rightly tell YOU where to put your notions of "morality" and to stop interfering with its business: to MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS.

You CANNOT have it both ways. CHOOSE.

[Rhetorical only. As good corporatists, Techdirt will continue to promote the personhood fiction when need to silence critics, while when suits will blithely be humanist and inconsistent. It’s easy to be a ‘dirty.]

Mincher Schnauzer says:

Re: Either corporations are persons with Rights to do as want...

And of course the tension arises from regarding Chinese Communists as at all civilized, when in fact are continuing the most brutal Communist regime ever. The West should never have started “trading” with it at all. That’d be true humanism with a bit of foresight. But corporations — which are entirely amoral beasts, you’re only imagining share your humanist wishes — wanted access to slave labor for the arbitrage of selling cheap products in the rich West. So, again, The Rich and their corporations are obviously main problems, must be taxed until they do morally right actions.

Gary (profile) says:

Re: Re: Either corporations are Trolls

Inflate your self importance much?

Posting two or three silly comments in a row doesn’t make you right – it just shows that you are trying to shout down folks down.

I’m not ever sure what you are shouting about. You hate corporations, and claim to love common law – but hate judges and congress who make common law. You hate pirates and love it when corporations attack them – so mostly you just love corporations, right?

If you really had something to say, you’d have your own blog. If you want to prove to us that you aren’t a liar, a troll, and a fraud show us a comprehensive manifesto. Otherwise you are just shouting fragments like "Persons!" without context. (And this is clearly the tactic of someone who is listening to someone else’s dogma, but doesn’t really understand it, and thus can’t explain it.)

Have you every actually explained why my definition of "Common Law" isn’t the same as yours? No, you just shout "Aha!" and run off.

So put up or shut up. Or keep running your kiddie troll mouth from your mom’s basement.

stderric (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Either corporations are Trolls

If you want to prove to us that you aren’t a liar, a troll, and a fraud show us a comprehensive manifesto.

I’ve always thought of him as the epitome of someone who does have a manifesto — in the sense of "700 volumes, written in crayon, covering Google mind-control, a comparison of Reynolds Wrap vs. generic aluminum foil, the best sources for buying 70s-era Testors model paint, random grocery lists, and Zdzisław Beksiński/Care Bears fanfic".

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »