Colorado Voters Shoot Down Comcast's Shitty, Protectionist State Broadband Law

from the Comcast-knows-what's-best-for-you dept

For years we’ve noted how large ISPs like Comcast quite literally write and buy protectionist state laws preventing towns and cities from building their own broadband networks (or striking public/private partnerships). These ISPs don’t want to spend money to improve or expand service into lower ROI areas, but they don’t want towns and cities to either — since many of these networks operate on an open access model encouraging a little something known as competition. As such it’s much cheaper to buy a state law and a lawmaker who’ll support it — than to actually try and give a damn.

And while roughly twenty three states have passed such laws, Colorado’s SB 152, co-crafted by Comcast and Centurylink in 2005, was notably unique in that it let local towns and cities hold local referendums on whether they’d like to ignore it. And over the last few years, an overwhelming number of Colorado towns and cities have voted to do so, preferring to decide local infrastructure issues for themselves instead of having lobbyists for Comcast dictate what they can or can’t do in their own communities, with their own tax dollars.

Yet another vote on this front was held this week in Colorado Springs. Note that the vote only opened the door to letting city voters consider building such a network, yet Comcast and Centurylink broke local spending records in their attempts to scuttle the ballot initiative. That included numerous misleading videos trying to convince locals that if they voted yes on ignoring the protectionist state laws, the city would struggle to pave roads and develop affordable housing.

According to the Coloradoan, none of these efforts worked:

“Voters on Tuesday approved a city proposal that would permit the City Council to establish a telecommunications utility to provide broadband services. Unofficial, partial returns as of 12:42 a.m. showed the measure passing with 57.15 percent of the vote. Ballot Question 2B does not require the council to create the utility. It gives council flexibility in setting up a business model for providing high-speed internet, including entering into a partnership with a private company.”

Again, this doesn’t mean Fort Collins will build a network. But it should be obvious why large duopolies like Comcast (which is actually seeing a growing monopoly in more regions than ever) want to prevent towns from even discussing the idea. Actual competition would put an end to Comcast’s long-standing ability to charge more and more money (including usage caps and overage fees) for what’s quite literally the worst customer service in America. And as telcos in countless markets refuse to upgrade aging DSL lines, Comcast’s power is only growing.

Like net neutrality, for years Comcast successfully framed municipal broadband as a partisan debate to sow discord and stall these efforts. But disdain for Comcast’s abysmal service obliterates such partisan divides, and over time people have realized that more creative, government-involved approaches are necessary if we want to compensate for a broken market and improve the country’s mediocre broadband. If Comcast doesn’t like the idea of towns and cities getting into the broadband business, there remains an ingenious solution to the “problem”: provide better, cheaper, and faster service.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: comcast

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Colorado Voters Shoot Down Comcast's Shitty, Protectionist State Broadband Law”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Just wait until Google Fibber hits town!

I can pay millions for the government to supply the service or tens of millions in fees for a private business to pinky-promise that they will supply the same service at some point. Probably.

You left out a few words there. Being paid for the job does not actually mean that it will be done, as the companies in question have made quite clear in the past.

Seam (profile) says:

Re: which city?

I was thinking the same thing. I got a little confused. I just looked at an article from the Denver Post today. Fort Collins passed this two years ago, but just okayed spending tax dollars to explore starting a city owned broadband provider.

These are the cities that voted to opt out of SB 152

Eagle County: 85 percent
Boulder County: 82 percent
Alamosa: 71 percent
Avon: 83 percent
Dillon: 74 percent
Eagle: 85 percent
Fort Lupton: 66 percent
Georgetown: 76 percent
Greeley: 61 percent
Gypsum: 85 percent
Idaho Springs: 70 percent
Kremmling: 88 percent
Louisville: 82 percent
Manitou Springs: 84 percent
Minturn: 81 percent
Monte Vista: 61 percent
Silverthorne: 85 percent
Snowmass Village: 90 percent
Vail: 85 percent

Colorado Springs voted in April to opt out. They voted yesterday to invest in city owned broadband.

David says:

Matter of scale

If Comcast doesn’t like the idea of towns and cities getting into the broadband business, there remains an ingenious solution to the "problem": provide better, cheaper, and faster service.

Taking more money and/or reducing value for millions while giving to dozens is much more likely to leave you with lined pockets than the other way round.

The Supreme Court has ruled bribery to be a First Amendment activity, so of course it is the most effective as well as legal way to secure profits.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...