Surprise! European Union Adopts Net Neutrality Guidelines That Don't Suck

from the actually-listening-to-the-people dept

As we noted last October, the European Union passed net neutrality rules that not only don’t really protect net neutrality, but actually give ISPs across the EU member countries the green light to violate net neutrality consistently — just as long as ISPs are relatively clever about it. Just like the original, overturned 2010 net neutrality rules in the States, Europe’s new rules (which took effect April 30) are packed with all manner of loopholes giving exemption for “specialized services” and “class-based discrimination,” as well as giving the green light for zero rating.

Fortunately, the European Union’s Body of European Regulators of Electronic Communications (BEREC) has been cooking up new guidelines to help European countries interpret and adopt the new rules. Under heavy pressure from net neutrality advocates overseas, the BEREC’s final guidelines have been published and they’re notably better than many people predicted. Much of the worst-offending loophole language has been trimmed back, despite earlier threats by European wireless providers that they’d withhold fifth-generation (5G) upgrades if the guidelines toughened up the rules (a common, empty bluff in telecom).

Much of the worrying language carving out tractor-trailer-sized loopholes for “specialized services,” or “class-based discrimination,” has been either pared back or clarified. The guidelines also strongly encourage EU member state governments to avoid letting ISPs block users looking to use their wireless phones as modems (aka “tethering”). BEREC also comes down harder on exempting some content from usage caps (aka “zero rating”), because as we’re seeing in the states (where regulators are actively encouraging the practice) it can be very easily used to try and hinder services that compete with an ISPs own offerings:

“…The zero price applied to the data traffic of the zero-rated music application creates an economic incentive to use that music application instead of competing ones. The effects of such a practice applied to a specific application are more likely to ?undermine the essence of the endusers’ rights? or lead to circumstances where ?end-users? choice is materially reduced in practice? (Recital 7) than when it is applied to an entire category of applications.

While an indisputably big win for net neutrality advocates (this item saw the biggest public feedback in the history of BEREC consultations), these are still guidelines, and actual rules and enforcement may still vary significantly among EU member states. Upon initial read there’s still numerous instances where bad behavior is still allowed if it’s justified (often flimsily) by the ISP as necessary for network health and security, a concept we’ve seen consistently abused here in the States. The phantom congestion bogeyman has long been useful to justify anti-competitive behavior in telecom markets worldwide.

In short this is a promising step forward for European net neutrality advocates, but just as in the States, net neutrality advocates need to be wary of thinking the fight is over. These are just cornerstone victories in a battle that will never truly end thanks to incumbent ISPs that will never stop looking for new, creative ways to abuse the lack of competition the broadband last mile. The less broadband competition in a market, the more intense the fight.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Surprise! European Union Adopts Net Neutrality Guidelines That Don't Suck”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

unfortunately the door has still been left open for abuse by ISPs and you can bet they will find ways of doing that! giving them the option to throttle to be able to keep their networks working properly for everyone is a recipe for disaster with torrent traffic being hit the earliest and the hardest. i wonder how they are going to justify doing that, when businesses also use torrent to transfer big files great distances easily, but only hit the ordinary people?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

unfortunately the door has still been left open for abuse by ISPs and you can bet they will find ways of doing that!

There is always a door left open. It’s always intentional, that is why they spend a lot of time creating labyrinthine rules.

But it will not stop the tools from cheering for more regulation.

Anonymous Coward says:

These are just cornerstone victories in a battle that will never truly end thanks to incumbent ISPs that will never stop looking for new, creative ways to abuse the lack of competition the broadband last mile

Not true everywhere, there are plenty of places with healthy competition on the last mile, at least were I live. This is especially true for fiber networks and god does it show in what you pay and for ISP behavior

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I did point the finger at a target, Government Regulation. That is the target.

A lot of peeps falsely accuse Capitalism as the problem. The only thing Capitalism means is that Business can be privately owned. If you hate that, then you think government should own the business. That means you will only ever GET what Government wants you to get… well because they fucking OWN IT!!!

History has proven that people are lazy and will not work to improve their lots in life. Yes there are numerous exceptions, but they are sure not the fucking majority! When you let the FEW interested people in Government run the operation you get the MANY being ruled by the FEW again, repeat ad nausea.

History proves that Capitalism and Free Market are the best “possible” tools. Sure capitalism and free market are not without flaws, but Regulation just “ensures” that you get everything that IS wrong with Capitalism/Free Market ideals in addition to, corrupt government interference or regulatory capture as some “pleasantly” call it.

Calls for regulation are literally calls to cause or exacerbate the very problem we are asking to be resolved!

Wendy Cockcroft (user link) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

Your argument fails on so many levels, the most egregious one being that there’s no such thing as the free market.

As for Capitalism meaning only that businesses can be privately owned you haven’t got a clue:

There’s not a black-or-white choice between only capitalism or only socialism. The world is a bigger, more interesting place than that.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (79)
More arrow