The European Union's New Net Neutrality 'Protections' Are A Joke

from the blind-and-beholden dept

After months of negotiations (read: ISP lawyer and lobbyist rewrites), the European Union has voted to approve new net neutrality rules (pdf) that for many nation states may be worse than having no net neutrality protections at all. As we've noted, the rules ignore zero rating, carve out massive loopholes for "specialized services," "class-based discrimination," and even include provisions allowing ISP throttling and discrimination provided it's addressing phantom congestion that hasn't even happened yet. In short, these rules effectively protect ISPs looking to creatively violate net neutrality, not European consumers.

European Parliament members completely ignored last-minute suggested amendments that would have closed these loopholes. They also completely ignored opposition to the rules by the likes of BitTorrent, EyeEm, Foursquare, Kickstarter, WordPress, Netflix, Reddit, Transferwise, Vimeo, the EFF and Tim Berners-Lee (who penned a lengthy blog post outlining his opposition to the rules). Similarly, only 50 MEPs out of the European Parliament's total of 751 could be bothered to even attend a superficial "debate" preceding the approval vote.

These pathetic protections were accepted in part because they were sold as part of a Telecoms Single Market package that was to include significant abolition of steep European roaming fees on wireless networks. Many MEPs didn't fight harder on net neutrality because they thought they were at least getting some decent wireless market reform. But as German Pirate Party MEP Julia Reda notes, even the roaming provisions appear to have been notably gutted from the final offering:
"Despite all this, the regulation was passed unchanged by a majority in plenary today, a decision that may have been influenced by the public’s attention for the provision on the elimination of roaming surcharges that was included in the legislative package. Unfortunately, the Telecoms Single Market package doesn’t deliver in that respect either. The plan to place an end to roaming surcharges in Europe has been adopted pending a review of pricing and consumption patterns. Even if the review is completed by the 15 June 2017 deadline, roaming surcharges will only be suspended up to a ‘fair use’ limit beyond which they still apply and continue to hinder the breaking down of barriers within Europe."
In other words, even the carrot on a stick used to lure European Parliament members into voting for bad net neutrality rules wound up being rotten. Of course, European ISPs shouldn't pat themselves on the back just yet. The EU's flimsy rules strongly resemble the original, pathetic net neutrality rules passed here in the States in 2010. Those rules, all but written by AT&T, Verizon and Google, were so obviously useless that consumer outrage forced the government to revisit an issue they honestly believed they'd put to bed. The U.S. now has notably tougher net neutrality rules than ever, assuming they aren't dismantled by the courts.

As EU member residents realize their new net neutrality rules actually protect ISPs, you'll likely see a strong push for the entire issue to be revisited down the road, much to the chagrin of ISP lawyers who believe they've just put the issue to bed.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 9:52am

    It's Political Theatre Double-Speak

                    But some are more equal than others
    The Orwellian "All pigs are created equal ^." version of Net Neutrality.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 10:05am

    The fight is not over yet atleast we have competition here so fast line will be unpopular

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 10:16am

    You have to pass it to read it

    Sounds like lawmakers everywhere need to start reading what they are voting on, you know, before they actually vote.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 12:35pm

      Re: You have to pass it to read it

      It was a non-issue. While the bill was gutted to hell, every party was interested in the roaming issue and could sell that as a massive win for ideology and national interests. The net-neutrality was completely left up to european ISPs. European ISPs suffer from the same lack of competition and getting massive subsidies as you know it from USA. Needless to say they have got plenty of money to use on convincing politicians and since they gave something in the form of accepting a gutted roaming-reform, they were awarded with advantages in the rest of the bill.

      Please stop calling it net-neutrality. The result is anything but neutral and I don't even know if it is formulated for a net since it is so vague!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 1:21pm

        Re: Re: You have to pass it to read it

        there a lot of competition in the EU

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 2:53pm

          Re: Re: Re: You have to pass it to read it

          Depends on where you live. Most places you have the monopoly owners of the physical infrastructure trying to milk competitors and abuse the laws, while recieving subsidies. I am bound by a stipulation of only having a specific network by my landlord ie.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 28 Oct 2015 @ 2:59pm

      Re: You have to pass it to read it

      Sounds like lawmakers everywhere need to start reading what they are voting on ...

      Lawmakers listen to what their exec. assistants tell them. The rest of the time, they're raising campaign donations.

      That's what we have to work with. Not much. Write letters?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 12:02pm

    Newspeak...

    I'll repeat what I said earlier this week: this is NOT net neutrality. Rather, it is the explicit permission to do the exact opposite.

    If you really want net neutrality, you just need one rule:

    "ISP must pass all requests and data from all customers (both clients and servers) without regard of the origin, destination, nature and/or content in an equally swift manner."

    Every other rule can only make it less neutral.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Oct 2015 @ 1:04pm

    Fuck the EU.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    legalcon (profile), 27 Oct 2015 @ 2:58pm

    hmm

    Here's an even more novel idea: DON'T REGULATE THE INTERNET. Of course, since people make money off selling bandwidth, making them inherently evil, the idiots here will naturally find this notion offensive, if they understand it at all.

    Of course, it would also be nice if we could force local governments to deregulate local zoning laws, which might allow for additional land-based connectivity and competition, but that would strip those idiots of what little power they have too. Then again, competition means more evil money grubbers, so naturally we should oppose that too.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    tqk (profile), 28 Oct 2015 @ 2:55pm

    The plan to place an end to roaming surcharges in Europe has been adopted pending a review of pricing and consumption patterns. Even if the review is completed by the 15 June 2017 deadline, roaming surcharges will only be suspended up to a ‘fair use’ limit beyond which they still apply and continue to hinder the breaking down of barriers within Europe."

    In other words, even the carrot on a stick used to lure European Parliament members into voting for bad net neutrality rules wound up being bought.

    FTFY. Can't everybody smell the stink of cash buying politicos' and lobbyists' efforts? Why do we suffer these assholes' existence? They're like mold on old bread. Throw it out.

    Europe (nobody) needs roaming fees, ffs, and everybody sees the sense in this. It's all machines connecting with other machines. If it's harder for others than some tell them to fix it to keep up. Don't entrench it by paving over it with extortionate fees for your easily overcome ineptitude & rentseeking. It's robbery defended by ineptitude.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Caution: Copyright
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.