Texas Attorney General Sues Self To Stop Self From Releasing Documents He Says Can't Be Released

from the ourobouros dept

Don’t mess with Texas. It’s already a mess.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been in the news quite a bit lately. He tried to block the state from recognizing a common-law marriage between two women (who had been together for eight years), but had his efforts undone by a Travis County court.

Around this same time, a second convening of a grand jury managed to do what the first one couldn’t: bring an indictment against Paxton for alleged financial fraud. Paxton apparently wasn’t very forthcoming about what he stood to gain from the sale of $200,000 in Servergy stock to a couple of investors. The apparent sketchiness of Paxton’s actions was compounded by an ongoing investigation of the company by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Now, he’s in the middle of another conflict. Texas legislators aren’t too happy that the state’s Department of Public Safety keeps asking for money, but failing to provide many details on how it’s being spent.

When the DPS in March this year asked for another $123 million to help “secure the border,” state Rep. Cesar Blanco blasted the DPS for taking credit for work done by the federal government, and failing to back up its claims with data.

“The state has nothing to show for its money,” Blanco, D-El Paso, told El Paso Times on March 30.

According to the DPS, it was partnering with Customs and Border Patrol on a “surge” effort to stop illegal immigration and drug trafficking. The CBP, on the other hand, portrayed the so-called “partnership” as the DPS’s attempt to do a little coattail-riding on an ongoing effort by the DHS agency. It claimed it had not participated in a joint effort with the state entity.

Two local newspapers started digging into the dubious claims the DPS was making to justify the need for more handouts. What they uncovered was some very dubious math.

DPS merged Border Patrol’s massive drug seizure statistics with its own to tout the operation’s effectiveness,” the American-Statesman reported in June, and when state lawmakers asked for “DPS-specific statistics,” the DPS refused.

The newspaper continued digging for information, seeking receipts and other documents related to expenses racked up by scattered DPS agents sent ostensibly to “aid” the CBP in its border-securing efforts. The DPS apparently has no intention of handing over these records and has sued to keep them secret.

That’s where things get really twisted. AG Ken Paxton has the final say on the release of public records by the DPS. To obtain an injunction, the DPS has to sue Paxton to prevent the release of documents. It has done so, claiming the usual stuff about “safety” and “terrorism.”

Public records law requires the DPS to sue the attorney general if it wants to keep secret information the attorney general wants to release. It did sue him, on Tuesday, claiming the information could endanger state troopers’ “physical safety” or create a “substantial threat of physical harm.”

It also claims that the information is confidential because it involves “preventing, detecting, responding to, or investigating an act of terrorism or related criminal activity.”

The DPS asked a Travis County judge to exempt it from disclosure under the “common-law physical safety exception” and the Homeland Security Act.

And the twist? Another conflict of interest.

The DPS is represented, oddly, by Attorney General Paxton.

So, Paxton is suing Paxton to prevent Paxton from releasing documents Paxton claims (by proxy) can’t be released for safety/terrorism reasons. However, Paxton must obtain a favorable ruling from a judge to force himself not to release documents he possibly feels shouldn’t be released in the first place. It all comes down to Paxton, who can press either side of the argument, depending on his personal feelings.

This won’t be the first time Paxton has basically sued himself. Courthouse News Service covered a similarly incongruous legal filing back in February.

The Texas Department of Public Safety sued Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, claiming DPS information about anti-terrorism operations in its school marshal program is exempt from disclosure, in Travis County Court.

And, as if everything couldn’t get any more conflicting/interesting, the Texas House voted in April to move the authority for prosecuting corruption allegations against state officials from the county’s Public Integrity Unit to the Department of Public Safety — which is represented by an attorney general currently facing securities fraud charges.

It appears the left hand indeed knows what the right hand is doing, at least in terms of the DPS and its various interests. This normally would be a good thing, as government entities often seem to operate as free agents, rather than as complementary parts of a cohesive whole. But in this case, the guy who has the final say on document releases has to sue himself to override his own decisions. On top of that, should Paxton decide to participate in any more (allegedly) fraudulent behavior, he’ll be doing so as the legal representative of the agency charged with charging him.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Texas Attorney General Sues Self To Stop Self From Releasing Documents He Says Can't Be Released”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mason Wheeler (profile) says:

Wow. Remember when The Mikado was just satire?

KO: Pooh-Bah, it seems that the festivities in connection with my approaching marriage must last a week. I should like to do it handsomely, and I want to consult you as to the amount ought to spend upon them.
POOH: Certainly. In which of my capacities? As First Lord of the Treasury, Lord Chamberlain, Attorney General, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Privy Purse, or Private Secretary?
KO: Suppose we say as Private Secretary.
POOH: Speaking as your Private Secretary, I should say that, as the city will have to pay for it, don’t stint yourself, do it well.
KO: Exactly—as the city will have to pay for it. That is your advice.
POOH: As Private Secretary. Of course you will understand that, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, I am bound to see that due economy is observed.
KO: Oh! But you said just now “Don’t stint yourself, do it well”.
POOH: As Private Secretary.
KO: And now you say that due economy must be observed.
POOH: As Chancellor of the Exchequer.
KO: I see. Come over here, where the Chancellor can’t hear us. (They cross the stage.) Now, as my Solicitor, how do you advise me to deal with this difficulty?
POOH: Oh, as your Solicitor, I should have no hesitation in saying “Chance it——”
KO: Thank you. (Shaking his hand.) I will.
POOH: If it were not that, as Lord Chief Justice, I am bound to see that the law isn’t violated.
KO: I see. Come over here where the Chief Justice can’t hear us. (They cross the stage.) Now, then, as First Lord of the Treasury?
POOH: Of course, as First Lord of the Treasury, I could propose a special vote that would cover all expenses, if it were not that, as Leader of the Opposition, it would be my duty to resist it, tooth and nail. Or, as Paymaster General, I could so cook the accounts that, as Lord High Auditor, I should never discover the fraud. But then, as Archbishop of Titipu, it would be my duty to denounce my dishonesty and give myself into my own custody as first Commissioner of Police.
KO: That’s extremely awkward.

Anonymous Coward says:

SCENE: Standard courtroom

PAXTON (FACING LEFT): Your Honor, I move to dismiss this lawsuit on the grounds that my opponent is an utter imbecile.

PAXTON (FACING RIGHT): Your, Honor, I move to dismiss this motion on the grounds that my opponent has never satisfactorily answered the musical question, ‘What Kind Of Fool Am I?’

JUDGE: Takes boots off bench, takes a swig of whiskey, and CLOSEUP: *FACEPALM*


Personanongrata says:

Citizen Oversight of Law Enforcement is a Must

Now, he’s in the middle of another conflict. Texas legislators aren’t too happy that the state’s Department of Public Safety keeps asking for money, but failing to provide many details on how it’s being spent.

Apparently the only thing the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) wants from the citizens of Texas is that their money is to be unquestioningly handed over to the state under the guise of taxation so DPS (etal) may spend it any way they please in secret.

These cretins are worse than criminals as they are fractions of Americans/Texans who hide their felonious ways behind the “law”.

In a just world every last one of these tax-feeding turd stains would answer for their illegitimate actions while “working” with public monies/trust, especially the ringleader Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

We can’t answer for why we did this because the terrorists will win.

Something something become what you are fighting against.

Government has become bigger terrorist than the ‘real’ terrorists.

Perhaps it is time to stop taking the fear pills they hand out and demand we go back to accountability, stop handing out passes for misbehavior, and if they are screw ups get rid of them.

Protip: The otherside isn’t red or blue – its those with the power and they always win. Stop focusing on the hot buttons and ask yourself why we funnel billions to military contractors while we still have an infant mortality rate that is not good.

Anonymous Coward says:


Why does the stupid always seems to come from you? I know too much sun can make one irksome and maybe even dangerous when escaping the heat in a bar with your gun, get drunk and in open carry of course.

Maybe these central states that eternally voting red and the graphs I’ve seen of counties in the US who add toxic industrial waste to drinking water. And then I have to conclude, yes, sodium fluoride should not be added to the water, it passes straight into your mouth, doesn’t do the same job as when you brush your teeth, like, not at all, it just goes through into your stomach, before you hit the bars, you probably had so much water from the heat, that maybe I can understand the stupid a little better.

But when it comes to what should be done about it, somebody in higher power in the government should say stop embarrassing us and quit your job while you’re ahead, or we’ll force you. There should be like Texas Oversight Act to have a special comittee overlooking Texas at all times in the Senate, maybe.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...