Why Patent Trolls Love East Texas... And Why Congress Needs To Fix It

from the is-there-a-patent-on-jurisdiction-shopping? dept

Back in 2011, This American Life toured an office building in Marshall, Texas, and found eerie hallways of empty offices that serve as the 'headquarters' of patent trolls. For many, that was the first introduction to the strange world of the Eastern District of Texas, its outsized role in patent litigation and, especially, its effective support of the patent troll business model. Trolls love the Eastern District for its plaintiff-friendly rules, so they set up paper corporations in the district as an excuse to file suit there. Meanwhile, defendants find themselves dragged to a distant, inconvenient, and expensive forum that often has little or no connection to the dispute.

The remote district's role has only increased since 2011. The latest data reveals that the Eastern District of Texas is headed to a record year. An astonishing 1,387 patent cases were filed there in the first half of 2015. This was 44.4% of all patent cases nationwide. And almost all of this growth is fueled by patent trolls.

Happily, lawmakers have finally moved to restore some balance. The latest version of the Innovation Act in the House includes language that would make it much harder for trolls to file in the Eastern District of Texas. The proposal goes under the decidedly mundane name of "venue reform" but it could actually be crucial to the effort fix our broken patent system.

The Luckiest Court in the Universe

The Eastern District of Texas is a federal court district running along the Texas-Louisiana border. The district covers a largely rural area without much of a technology industry. It is just one of 94 federal district courts. (Some states, like Vermont, have a single federal district, while others, like Texas and California, have as many as four.) If patent cases were distributed evenly among the federal district courts, each one would have received about 33 cases so far this year – a far cry from the 1,387 filings in the Eastern District of Texas.

Accident? We don't think so. In fact, we ran a calculation to see how likely it is that at least 1,387 of 3,122 patent cases might end up there by chance. This was the result:

This probability is so vanishingly small that you'd be more likely to win the Powerball jackpot 200 times in a row. Obviously, something other than chance is attracting trolls to this remote district.

Now that folks are taking notice, some Eastern District of Texas jurists are feeling a bit defensive. Former Judge Leonard Davis, for example, recently said: "To say the Eastern District is responsible [for the patent troll problem] is to say that the Southern District of Texas is responsible for immigration problems." This is nonsense. The Southern District of Texas gets immigration cases because it sits on the U.S.-Mexico border. There is no equivalent reason for the Eastern District of Texas to be a hotbed of patent litigation. To understand why the district sees so much patent trolling, we need to look deeper.

How We Got Here

The Eastern District of Texas was not always so popular. In 1999, only fourteen patent cases were filed there. By 2003, the number of filings had grown to fifty-five. Ten years later, in 2013, it was 1,495.

This massive rise in litigation followed the appointment of Judge T. John Ward in 1999, and his drive to create local patent rules. Judge Ward's rules, while similar to patent rules in other federal districts, had some additional plaintiff-friendly features such as a compressed discovery schedule and a short timeline to trial. This so-called "rocket docket" attracted patent plaintiffs eager to use the compressed schedule to pressure defendants to settle. For those cases that went to trial, the district got a reputation for huge patent verdicts. As one commentator explained, the Eastern District's "speed, large damage awards, outstanding win-rates, likelihood of getting to trial, and plaintiff-friendly local rules suddenly made [it] the venue of choice for patent plaintiffs."

The explosion in patent litigation promptly led to a burst of new economic activity in East Texas. As the BBC wrote, Marshall is a "sleepy town kept busy with patent cases." The patent litigation boom creates business for hotels, restaurants, trial graphics services, copying, expert witnesses, jury consultants, court-appointed technical advisers, and, of course, lawyers. In other words, patent litigation has become important to the economic health of the communities surrounding the courthouse. But the federal courts don't exist to generate business for a particular region.

Tipping The Scales on Both Procedure and Substance

So why are these plaintiff-friendly rules so important? First, the rules impose particular burdens on defendants. If a patent case proceeds to discovery—the process whereby parties hand over information potentially relevant to the case—it will usually be more expensive in the Eastern District of Texas. This is because the local discovery order in patent cases requires parties to automatically begin producing documents before the other side even requests them. In patent troll cases, this imposes a much higher burden on defendants. Operating companies might be forced to review and disclose millions of documents while shell-company patent trolls tend to have very few documents. Trolls can exploit this imbalance to pressure defendants to settle.

Second, the rules make it harder to eliminate cases early. The Supreme Court's decision in Alice v CLS Bank invalidated many of the low-quality software patents favored by patent trolls. But this only helps defendants if they are able to get a ruling to that effect from the judge overseeing their case. Judges Rodney Gilstrap and Robert Schroeder recently indicated that they would require patent defendants to ask permission before they can file a motion to dismiss raising Alice. This means that defendants in the Eastern District of Texas will more often be forced to go through expensive discovery.

When judges in the Eastern District do issue rulings on challenges raising Alice, their decisions are very different from jurists in other parts of the country. Recent data from Docket Navigator analyzed all challenges under 35 USC § 101 so far this year:

  • Nationwide: 71% granted or partially granted; 29% denied (76 decisions)
  • Northern District of California: 82% granted or partially granted; 18% denied (11 decisions)
  • District of Delaware: 90% granted or partially granted; 10% denied (10 decision)
  • Eastern District of Texas: 27% granted; 73% denied (11 decisions)

While each challenged patent claim is different, the overall trend suggests judges in the Eastern District of Texas are applying Alice in a way that is far more favorable to patent owners.

The Alice decision, and its companion, Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness gave judges additional tools for quickly dismissing meritless patent cases and holding unscrupulous plaintiffs to account. This means that patent trolls—particularly those that bring weak cases hoping to use the cost of defense to extort a settlement—now need a favorable forum more than ever. Small wonder we've seen a spike in EDTX filings.

We have also written about unfair rules that make it harder for patent defendants to file for summary judgment in the Eastern District of Texas. These rules have a real impact. A recent study found that judges in the Eastern District granted only 18% of motions for summary judgment of invalidity while the national grant rate is 31%. And that statistic, of course, does not include all the summary judgment motions that would have been filed had the defendant been given permission.

Judges in the Eastern District of Texas have also harmed defendants by delaying rulings on motions to transfer (these are motions where the defendant asks for the case to be moved to a more sensible location). Delay prejudices defendants because they are stuck litigating an expensive case in a remote forum while the judge sits on the motion. (The judges' rules make clear that a pending motion to transfer or a motion to dismiss is not grounds to stay discovery in a case). The Federal Circuit recently issued a stern order (PDF) finding that an Eastern District magistrate judge had "arbitrarily refused to consider the merits" of a transfer motion. When that transfer motion was finally considered, it was granted (PDF), but not until after extensive litigation had already occurred, and requiring the parties to pay for a court-appointed technical advisor (PDF). More generally, studies have also found the Eastern District of Texas is reversed by the Federal Circuit at a higher rate compared to other districts.

Venue Reform Can Fix the Mess

It's time for Congress to act. Although the Federal Circuit has overruled some of the Eastern District of Texas' most egregious venue decisions, it has failed to bring basic fairness to where patent cases are litigated. We need new legislation to clarify that patent cases belong in forums with a real connection to the dispute.

Fortunately, Congress is looking at the problem. Representative Darrell Issa recently offered an amendment (PDF) to the Innovation Act that would tighten venue standards in patent cases. On June 11, the House Judiciary Committee approved the amendment. If this bill becomes law, shell company patent trolls will no longer be able to drag out of state operating companies all the way to Eastern Texas.

It's long past time for Congress to bring fairness to where, and how, patent cases are litigated. Contact your representative and tell them to pass the Innovation Act and to ensure that any final bill includes meaningful venue reform.

Republished from the Electronic Frontier Foundation Deeplinks blog


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    David, 18 Aug 2015 @ 9:37am

    As expected

    Former Judge Leonard Davis, for example, recently said: "To say the Eastern District is responsible [for the patent troll problem] is to say that the Southern District of Texas is responsible for immigration problems." This is nonsense. The Southern District of Texas gets immigration cases because it sits on the U.S.-Mexico border. There is no equivalent reason for the Eastern District of Texas to be a hotbed of patent litigation.

    If you take a look at the decisions from the Texas school boards, it's sort of obvious that bordering on Mexico is not as much of an influence on Texas as bordering on insanity is.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 18 Aug 2015 @ 11:04am

      Re: As expected

      If you take a look at the decisions from the Texas school boards, it's sort of obvious that bordering on Mexico is not as much of an influence on Texas as bordering on insanity is.

      True, but this is only a symptom of a larger problem. The USA as a whole is suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder, and all those personalities are schizophrenic. Sure, the USA and its people have done some marvelous things, up to and including putting men on the moon and building the Internet. Meanwhile, they turn a blind eye to things like this where Paul Newman's Judge Roy Bean is still holding court in the sticks down in Texas, and the South still wants to celebrate the Confederacy! Add in that wonderful, brilliant document called the Constitution, then mix in CIA and NSA and AUSA machinations to undercut it at every turn.

      It's bizarre to watch. It would be funny if it wasn't so horrible for the victims forced to suffer through it. I'm thankful I'm not one of them and I'm allowed to merely witness the mess from afar.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chris, 18 Aug 2015 @ 9:49am

    "This probability is so vanishingly small that you'd be more likely to win the Powerball jackpot 200 times in a row"

    Patent trolls probably feel that filing in East Texas IS akin to winning the Powerball jackpot...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 18 Aug 2015 @ 10:15am

    Patent Plaintiffs

    You mentioned 'plaintiff' six times. It would save ink or electrons to simply use the shorter and more accurate word 'troll' instead.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 18 Aug 2015 @ 10:18am

    Venue Reform is a good idea

    Texas cattle, oil and domestic abuse lawsuits should be conducted in court venues located in high technology development centers.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Sheogorath (profile), 18 Aug 2015 @ 10:22am

    Plaintiff

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means, EDTX.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Aug 2015 @ 10:25am

    It really sounds like the judges are corrupt in east Texas. They have their own cottage industry going that is bringing wealth to the area unjustly.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    JoeDetroit (profile), 18 Aug 2015 @ 1:08pm

    Listen to the This American Life episode...

    ...it is very well done.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Anon E. Mous (profile), 18 Aug 2015 @ 1:19pm

    So really what you have here is a Federal Court District where the Judges have gone Rogue and are tailoring the law to favorably fit Plaintiffs that sue companies in their courts.

    I always thought the requirements to be a judge is that you act honestly and are impartial to the cases that are before you and you rule according to law.

    It is more than obvious to anyone that has followed any of the cases that get filed in the Eastern District of Texas, that it is time for the Judges that sit in the Eastern District to be fired and removed from the bench.

    When you decide that you need not follow the rule of law and your impartiality is in question that signals it is time for sweeping changes to the Eastern District of Texas judiciary as they are now part of the problem instead of being the solution.

    If your a defendant in the Eastern District of Texas you have the deck stacked against you from the onset, and this is only due to the fact that the Judges there have gone rogue and decided that fair and impartial rulings from it's courts are far and few for those defendants who would have the belief arguments would be given fair weight under the law and rules of court.

    The fact that the Higher courts have admonished the Eastern District of Texas and their rulings only further serves to note that it is time to clean out the Judges who have decided that you can buy a favorably ruling from a judges in the Eastern District of Texas

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Aug 2015 @ 1:53pm

      Re:

      ...Judges...be fired and removed from the bench...

      I don't know about East Texas but in my area judges at County/Superior/District levels up to state Supreme Court are appointed for life and good behavior as provided by the US Constitution! They are subject to retention votes - not provided by the US Constitution but by state law - but the reality is nobody votes not to retain a judge unless they are really bad. And I cannot think of when such a vote occurred.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 18 Aug 2015 @ 6:25pm

      Re:

      That's one point of view. The other (Devil's Advocate) is that creators and rightsholders are being robbed blind by filthy pirates, enabled by megacorps (Megaupload, Google), and these so obviously plaintiff leaning judges you speak of are just leveling the playing field. Look how slow judge after judge was to finally twig to the antics of Prenda Law. Look how insulated the average judge is from understanding technology.

      The US' Justice system is FUBAR. It's now just a Legal system. Justice is just a lucky side effect for a few.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        David, 19 Aug 2015 @ 2:04am

        Re: Re:

        I'd argue that something the innocent and/or winners of a case have to pay for cannot reasonably be called "justice". When an innocent person cannot hope to break even, the system is not set up for providing justice but only moderation and/or retribution for hire.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Aug 2015 @ 2:06pm

    Why East Texas?

    Maybe the courthouse was built on top of a troll cave!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Aug 2015 @ 4:05pm

    Probably doesn't help that 10,000 dollars buys you ANY judge in East Texas, lock stock and corrupt barrel.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      David, 18 Aug 2015 @ 4:17pm

      Re:

      In that case, defendants would be just as likely to get a good deal. And if you want both sides to be stacking the bets, you'd better only start tilting the table once the first party pays for it.

      No, plain old corruption gives both sides a possibility to buy themselves injustice.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Aug 2015 @ 7:05pm

    I have been saying that for years!

    Of course my proposed method was thermonuclear detonation which might be a bit much.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.