Verizon Doubles Down On Bogus Claim Title II Will Kill Broadband Investment

from the Title-II-hurts-puppies dept

We’ve noted repeatedly that the broadband industry’s claims that Title II reclassification will hurt broadband network investment just aren’t supported by the facts. Title II, which governs the vocal components of wireless networks, certainly didn’t hurt Verizon’s effort to become the biggest, most profitable wireless carrier in the country, nor did it stop wireless carriers from spending $45 billion on spectrum at the latest FCC auction. It also certainly didn’t hurt Verizon when it asked to have FiOS classified under Title II to nab tax breaks. Apparently forgetting there were other people around, Verizon CFO Fran Shammo was even quoted last December as stating Title II won’t impact investment patterns in the slightest.

However, as anybody knows, when you’re proven wrong time and time and time again, the only sensible thing to do is to dig a deeper hole and double down on your bluff. With billions in potential revenue thwarted by real net neutrality rules, Verizon appears to be doing just that.

Shammo apparently got the memo that admitting the truth is a big no no, so the CFO came out firing during the company’s latest earnings conference call. Shammo now insists that everything he’s said previously before Congress and in the media has been “misquoted,” and Title II will most definitely hurt Verizon’s network investment strategy:

“I would emphasize also that the approach in whole or in part on Title II is an extreme and risky path that will jeopardize our investment and the development of innovation in Broadband Internet and related services.”

Except as Verizon’s own history shows, there’s really nothing risky about Title II with forbearance from heavier regulations, unless you’re a company looking to use gatekeeper power to make an extra buck. Still, Shammo just can’t help himself, and raises the ante further by insisting that this lack of investment will “trickle down” and hurt jobs:

“If we could curtail the investment of this industry, it will definitely trickle down to what we would consider middle-class jobs. And it?s because most of at least, for Verizon Wireless, a lot of our build are done by thousands of contractors across the United States, that will impact those small business and impact their employees.”

Except again, if the “trickle down” claim didn’t tip you off, that’s a bluff. Verizon’s not going to simply stop investing in its network with T-Mobile (and maybe even Google wireless) nipping at the company’s heels, though I’m sure those companies wish it would. Shammo proceeded to proclaim that Title II-based neutrality rules would most certainly lead to lawsuits, which if you think about it is a truly Nostradamus-grade prediction when you’re the one doing the suing. In short, Verizon’s going to stick to its lie that Title II hurts puppies, causes tears in the time/space continuum, and is horribly unpatriotic — whether we all like it or not.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: verizon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Verizon Doubles Down On Bogus Claim Title II Will Kill Broadband Investment”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
19 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Investments

Hmm… let’s see: Verizon has already stopped all future FiOS development in favor of Wireless build-out. Sprint has already stated that Title II should have no impact on Wireless investment. Because of the lack of infrastructure requirements, they’re most likely right — which means that Verizon has no leg to stand on.

The only thing preventing all-out competition in the Wireless spectrum is… the spectrum monopolies. Verizon got a HUGE chunk of that, so there’s not much reason for them to be impacted by Title II unless they’re planning to do something dodgy to the customers at a significant profit.

What I’d like to see is transmission services be separated from the actual cellular providers, who would lease bandwidth from the transmission services. Kind of what it looks like Google is planning to do.

Anonymous Coward says:

considering how much and how often Verizon, Comcast and AT&T have done whatever it takes to stop any and all competition, the claim just cant hold water. on the miniscule off chance that it did, perhaps then Google will be able to go ahead with a TRUE broadband option for just about everywhere. if Verizon and the others keep out of the way and keep quiet, maybe there’s something to what they say but i’ll bet a dime to a dollar that as soon as there was any hint of Google getting into discussions in ANY city for installing broadband the big 3 would go totally ape shit!!

Anonymous Coward says:

I would emphasize also that the approach in whole or in part on Title II is an extreme and risky path that will jeopardize our investment and the development of innovation in Broadband Internet and related services.

Their investment involves the following:

Putting out a press release $ X00.00 – $ X,000.00
Moving some equipment and people to the proposed area $ X,000 – $ X0,000 per day
Looking like you are doing something for a few weeks $ (X,000 – $ X0,000) * 28 days
Scamming the people in an area for years to come $ priceless
Half heartedly doing something is tough, for everything else there are lobbyists.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

If verizon hates title II

If Verizon hates title II, they would go absolutely apeshit over what I think really should happen: nationalize our entire communications infrastructure. Make it a bit like the highway system: let the people own the pipes, and let companies run their services over those pipes for a reasonable fee. Those fees are used to maintain and expand the infrastructure.

R.H. (profile) says:

Re: Re: If verizon hates title II

To be honest, the state governments are in charge of maintaining the highways (some states delegate part of this duty to local municipal governments). As such. their condition varies greatly depending on where you happen to be. The federal government did a pretty good job with their part, building them in the first place.

There are other reasons not to have the federal government owning communications infrastructure (I’m not sure I want to make surveillance easier) but, maintainance probably shouldn’t be one of them.

Anonymous Coward says:

What they really mean...

Is the exact opposite…

Due to stiffer competition, they’ll have to invest more heavily in order to retain their customer base – or allow someone else to eat that lunch.

Or maybe they’ll just give up and focus on wireless (until that finally earns better regulation as well)… we can only hope. I’d love to see a bunch of newcomers in the market start taking over the wireline infrastructure and do something useful with it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Does it take plastic surgery or just some injections to be able to say that with a straight face? They already use their standard Verizon FIOS CAPEX to build out fiber to their Verizon Wireless sites.

I bet after the stop all consumer FIOS footprint expansion they will turn around and claim to be investing in FIOS in spite of the current situation, when they are actually just wiring up their own equipment with fiber and claiming tax breaks and other credits.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (79)
More arrow