That's more than enough reason for these guys. If a check with "Isis" in the memo field sets off alarms, then someone with that as their actual name will receive 20X the scrutiny.
If the sex tape gawker had posted of hulk hogan had been recorded with his consent, I might have been on your side. As it is, fuck gawker, let them burn.
Especially if the old comments were to refer to the other posters by name. Here onTD for example, you see us talking to "that anonymous coward" or "that one guy" And once that comment has multiple people replying, it becomes beyond confusing to figure out who's talking about who without the identifiable names.
Ok then, I regret asking though in retrospect, seeing as how I've gotten enough replies to fill the pacific ocean with. Or at the very least the Indian Ocean.
Also I mainly stay loyal(to quote yourself past self in the article) because I enjoy hearing about the stupid and laughable legal threats you guys always report on. Always makes me laugh and wonder how the next person with a poor understanding of the legal system will make an even bigger mess of himself.
If you're going to try and use a tragedy to further your own personal political views/agenda, please go fuck yourselves. You are truly scum and are a disgrace and embarrassment to the human race if you talk about events like the attacks on Paris and misrepresent or outright lie in face of factual information to push your political narratives.
I'm not just talking about the major media outlets when I say this. And if by some miracle you happen to be reading this Jonathan McIntosh, here's special shoutout to you. Exactly why he earns this shoutout: http://m.imgur.com/TtEXwCo
Tried to use html tags to make post slightly prettier, but tags hate me, so fuck it.
As a general rule, I don't link to videos if I want to prove a point, I usually link an article, TD being a major example. Also I managed to completely miss where you said video. Brain is mothballing this days. If I link a video it's either because of a conversation about that one specifically, or the conversation is about jokes and really funny shit.
In fact, if you think encryption can be safely undermined raise your hand. Now everyone who raised their hand please write down everything a person would need to commit identity theft, SSN, PIN, DOB, on a piece of paper. Now leave that paper in the middle of your house with all the doors and windows unlocked.
I generally only provide a link if I feel they make my point significantly better than I myself could. Also, taking the time to write paragraphs each time someone asks a basic question about copyright, censorship, patent law, ect, is an absolute pain in the ass.
Re:
Had the exact same thought myself.
Her name is Isis
That's more than enough reason for these guys. If a check with "Isis" in the memo field sets off alarms, then someone with that as their actual name will receive 20X the scrutiny.
Re: Re:
I called the MPAA and told them that shillbot #138529 is acting up. They're fixing it now.
Re:
I suppose we should be happy it wasn't a standard grenade, given their proclivity to shoot to kill first and ask questions later.
Already did earlier today.
Re: Re: Re:
If the sex tape gawker had posted of hulk hogan had been recorded with his consent, I might have been on your side. As it is, fuck gawker, let them burn.
At least they didn't win.
I don't want to think about what would've happened had they won the fight.
Silicon Valley would've likely have seen a mass emigration. The effects from that on economy would've disastrous.
Archive.is?
You guys could just link to the archived articles. Go to archive.is, copy-paste the url, and give the crawler a minute to work its magic.
You know the old saying
Fight fire with fire.
Re: Re:
They did get pissed off at Ellen degeneres for showing some old technology to kids, claiming she should've given them credit.
So by this court's logic....
We all know what goes in the toilet, so can the cops walk into the bathroom stalls and collect your "waste" shall we say?
Re:
OR they're completely and utterly incompetent.
Happy to hear the TPP has another roadblock
The more time it takes means the more we can speak out against it.
Re: Re:
Especially if the old comments were to refer to the other posters by name. Here onTD for example, you see us talking to "that anonymous coward" or "that one guy" And once that comment has multiple people replying, it becomes beyond confusing to figure out who's talking about who without the identifiable names.
Re: Re: Say mike/Tim/anyone else over at TD?
Ok then, I regret asking though in retrospect, seeing as how I've gotten enough replies to fill the pacific ocean with. Or at the very least the Indian Ocean.
Also I mainly stay loyal(to quote yourself past self in the article) because I enjoy hearing about the stupid and laughable legal threats you guys always report on. Always makes me laugh and wonder how the next person with a poor understanding of the legal system will make an even bigger mess of himself.
Say mike/Tim/anyone else over at TD?
Out or random curiosity, what's your opinion(s) on GG Vs. Anti-GG? One of GG main focuses is ethics in journalism so I figured I'd might as well ask.
Talked about this sort of thing recently on Twitter. Here's a longer version
If you're going to try and use a tragedy to further your own personal political views/agenda, please go fuck yourselves. You are truly scum and are a disgrace and embarrassment to the human race if you talk about events like the attacks on Paris and misrepresent or outright lie in face of factual information to push your political narratives.
I'm not just talking about the major media outlets when I say this. And if by some miracle you happen to be reading this Jonathan McIntosh, here's special shoutout to you. Exactly why he earns this shoutout: http://m.imgur.com/TtEXwCo
Tried to use html tags to make post slightly prettier, but tags hate me, so fuck it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
As a general rule, I don't link to videos if I want to prove a point, I usually link an article, TD being a major example. Also I managed to completely miss where you said video. Brain is mothballing this days. If I link a video it's either because of a conversation about that one specifically, or the conversation is about jokes and really funny shit.
Re: Enough spin to power a city
In fact, if you think encryption can be safely undermined raise your hand. Now everyone who raised their hand please write down everything a person would need to commit identity theft, SSN, PIN, DOB, on a piece of paper. Now leave that paper in the middle of your house with all the doors and windows unlocked.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I generally only provide a link if I feel they make my point significantly better than I myself could. Also, taking the time to write paragraphs each time someone asks a basic question about copyright, censorship, patent law, ect, is an absolute pain in the ass.