Gwiz's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the golly-gee-whiz dept
This week's favorites post comes courtesy of Gwiz.
I have to admit that when I first said I would give the Favorite Posts a shot, I didn't realize how hard it would be to pick a few favorites from so many interesting articles. I happened to luck into a shorter week due to the holiday and I thought it might be easier, but not so much. Anyway, without further preamble, here are my picks for the week:
As an average working stiff with no vested interest in the industries usually discussed on Techdirt, my interests tend to lean towards the articles that deal with the slow erosion of things I hold dearly, like privacy, due process and protection against unreasonable search and seizures. The story about Austrian police seizing computers used as a Tor exit node was especially interesting to me. I found the initial discussion concerning anonymity on the internet to be very enlightening. This article also spawned an interesting phenomena in the comment section when one of the commenters voiced an extremely distasteful view of pedophilia. The subsequent reaction of the Techdirt community to this commenter became a very good argument in itself as to why the internet really is not a wild west that needs to be regulated and can do a fine job of policing itself.
Along the same lines, we had a few articles concerning PROTECT IP and the technological implications of this bill, which actually made me go and read the white paper written by some of the most knowledgeable people in regards to the DNS system. And, as an added bonus, we got to see a video of Mike discussing this issue. We also had the RIAA more or less attacking the public domain and telling us that it really has no value. At least, to offset that to some degree, we had the Polish Prime Minister realizing that things funded with public monies should be in the public domain. We need more thinking in that direction.
Making an account on any website is something I rarely do, but I felt compelled to register a profile on Techdirt for one main reason, the generally high level intelligence and mostly civil debates that happen in the comments section here. I have learned quite a bit from reading both sides of the debates and have on occasion had to revise my initial stance on issues because of it. The article about the arrest of people dancing at the Washington Memorial was one such post. When I last looked there were over 350 comments and the debate over civil disobedience and the reactions by law enforcement. Unfortunately, since I needed to keep abreast of all of the Techdirt articles this week, I haven't finished reading though them all, but what I did read was fascinating.
On a brighter note, it's good to see a body such as the UN acknowledging that the three strike laws and ACTA pose civil rights problems.
And lastly, on the humorous side of things, I found it very funny to see two fully grown companies acting like children on the playground and the Malaysian man who was required to apologize 100 times on Twitter for defaming someone, kind of like a modern day equivalent of writing "I will not say bad things about Susie" on the chalkboard.
Well, that's it for my Favorites this week. I hope you enjoyed them and it's back to lurking in the comment section for me.

Re: Re: So, anyone who still believes that "1984" is fiction?
You're like someone who thinks reading People every day makes them an expert is sociology.
Gave you an insightful AND a funny - for that line alone.
Re: Re: Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding
That's kind of the problem.... the 'whatever that means' part.
Are you seriously saying that someone should declare what the best path is before exploring ALL the paths? That's just crazy.
If you seriously think that our current copyright system is the best way, then you have no reason to be afraid of exploring different means to achieve the same goals.
Re: Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding
err...exclusive *rights*
Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding
He'll never put things into perspective or acknowledge that there are even positives.
You are the one looking at this issue with blinders on, most likely because you wish copyright to continue as an income stream for the lawyers.
Mike advocates that copyright should promote progress, whatever the means. You are the one who has decided that granting authors exclusive is the *only* path. Your narrow view leaves out way too many possibilities that could achieve the same ends.
Re: Re: Re:
But we give the exclusive rights to the artists/authors so that in turn can benefit the public. We don't give the rights to the public first.
... And a growing segment of the public is considering whether they wish to continue giving anyone those rights at all anymore. Copyright itself is being completely reconsidered these days.
The public is the most important stakeholder concerning copyright for the simple fact that those exclusive rights are granted by the public in the first place. That which is granted can always be revoked.
Re: I don't need your consent .....
....and as long as it is not for commercial gain
No so sure that's accurate. The paparazzi wouldn't exist if that was true.
Re: Re: Re:
Funny. SOPA provided for adversarial hearings.
Really? When was that? One of the last minute mark-ups before it was killed by the public outcry?
A lot of what I read was law scholars complaining that SOPA violated the First Amendment by not providing an adversarial hearing before taking actions like cutting off monetary funding. Like this one:
http://www.serendipity.li/cda/tribe-legis-memo-on-SOPA-12-6-11-1.pdf
You losers should make up your minds.
My mind is made up. Maybe you should quit trying to revise history.
Re: Re: "use of BitTorrent to select and share movies is expressive"
Blue's "common law copyright" theory has been dismantled so many times now it's not even funny anymore. Yet he keeps on spewing it out anyways.
Basically Blue's mind is made up these matters, so don't confuse with him facts.
Re:
None of these sites should be punished until they've lost a best- of- seven round of trials in front of 50 person juries.
I'd be content with a simple adversary hearing beforehand. Why are the content industries so afraid of anyone defending themselves? That's what I'd like to know.
Re:
Yeah, I don't get that either.
Another annoying "feature" of the free Hulu service is only having the latest 5 episodes of a show available. If someone happens to catch a middle episode at a friends house, likes it and then wants to see the series from the beginning they are SOL. Those are new eyeballs on ads that they are missing out on. Doesn't make much sense to me.
Re: Techdirt fanboys cheer self-confessed thieves.
Techdirt fanboys cheer self-confessed thieves.
Not me. I just happen to think that providing the services that people want is a better way to fighht piracy than increased enforcement that usually tends to collide with my inalienable rights.
All claim to spend heaps on content.
For me it's not a claim, it's a fact. DirectTV, Premimum channels, Netflix, Amazon books, Good Old Games and much more.
Once again proving the value of the "out_of_the_blue" screen name, my substance drives the commenting here. That's why Mike keeps me round: otherwise it's just "early" commenting saying that they're commenting early.
Yes, yes, Blue. Everyone who comes to Techdirt is here ONLY to see YOUR comments, of course.
Now that I have stroked your fragile ego a bit, will you please go away now?
Re: Re: Re: NOT "a valuable contribution to the field" -- IT'S A SURVEY.
ALL THOSE ARE LEGAL. (Yeah, maybe the corporations WISH they weren't, but they are.)
When looking at the economic impact of a situation, don't fall into the trap of discarding anything because it's illegal. Economics doesn't really care if something is legal or illegal, it only matters if it exists or not.
Re: Re: Re: Results of Wall Street stock traders survey:
Oh crap, nevermind. I thought that was a response to me, duh!
Re: Re: Results of Wall Street stock traders survey:
...we can do like you and hand-wave it away because it is self- serving
That's not what I said.
If the survey is backed with the methodology and survey process information, then no, I wouldn't just wave it away.
Re: Re: Re: NOT "a valuable contribution to the field" -- IT'S A SURVEY.
You are comparing thieves with honest people,...
Ummm no Blue. You compared them, not me. I was just pointing out that you are missing data on the comparison.
Do you think a weaseally "not sure" is going to sway anyone weighing the facts, let alone ME?
I'm not interested in "swaying" you in the slightest, Blue. Just pointing out to everyone else reading this that your comparison is incomplete. If you want to base your opinion on incomplete data, go right ahead, I don't care. But when you spout it out like it's the gospel truth, I will continue correct you. Ok? Have a nice day.
Re: Results of Wall Street stock traders survey:
Point is that people KNOW how surveys work and give self-serving answers.
Probably true.
Ya know what is also true? The surveyors usually know that people know how surveys work and give self-serving answers so they adjust the questions accordingly.
That's why the methodology and survey process itself are just as important as the results on ANY survey. As long as all the background information is available, any intelligent person can decide for themselves how much weight to give any results. It's surveys that attempt to hide the process (legacy gatekeepers - I'm talking about you!) that aren't worth the paper they are printed on.
Re: NOT "a valuable contribution to the field" -- IT'S A SURVEY.
The biggest pirates are STILL just freeloading at a fraction of the sum honest people would pay for as much content.
Not sure how true that really is Blue. This metric is relatively easy to measure. There are a lot of factors of your so called "honest people" that can't be measured. Loan a DVD to a friend, listen to the radio, watching a movie with a group of friends, wait for the movie to come out on TV, borrowing books from family, etc, etc. All consuming content without directly paying for it.
Re:
Once Again Top Downloaders Are Top Spenders, According To UK Gov't Study = Once Again Top Shoplifters Are Top Shoppers, According To UK Gov't Study
Who cares?
Umm...store proprietors who wish convert shoplifters into paying customers maybe.
Or they could waste more money on security and the alienation of this group of people and still be in lose-lose situation if they want, I guess. Doesn't make much business sense to me, but whatever.
Oh Noes!
Sometimes Tricky Rabbits without Crystal Ball access (like me) can comment early on some of the articles too, Blue.
(That ought to keep Blue busy with his conspiracy theories for awhile)
Re:
Oops.
Supposed to be response to out_of_the_blue, May 13th, 2013 @ 11:22am