Ramblings

Ramblings

by Mike Masnick


Print



Shareholder Astroturfing: Latest Tactic In Net Neutrality Debate

from the the-next-pointless-battle dept

We've spent way too much time on how both sides of the net neutrality debate have used astroturfing and other dishonest (or simply ridiculous) tactics to push their own side forward. However, it seems that every time you think you've seen it all, one side sinks even lower. The latest can best be described as "shareholder astroturfing." A mutual fund that owns a tiny bit of Microsoft stock is trying to use that to force the company to issue a report explaining its stand on net neutrality -- which, of course, the mutual fund claims is "expanded government regulation for the internet." Microsoft is asking the SEC if it can ignore the demand, as it really has nothing to do with Microsoft explaining its position, but is really just a PR stunt by anti-net neutrality supporters.

13 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Would it matter?

    by Anonymous Coward - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 12:50pm

    Microsoft's word (pun) couldnt be taken seriously here.. could it?

    Sigh, well, I suppose it could be taken seriously by the underinformed...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. SIX HUNDRED AND THIRTY SEVENTH POST

    by Anonymous Coward - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 12:51pm

    637th!!!!!

    (yeah, just as stupid as first post, isn't it?)

    (especially when its neither)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Re: SIX HUNDRED AND THIRTY SEVENTH POST

    by Anonymous Coward - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 1:04pm

    638! :-)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Net Neutrality

    by Tubador Ted Stevens - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 1:31pm

    Well, if Microsoft can help me unclog the tubes so I can get my internets on time, I'll listen to them.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Re: Net Neutrality

    by Insaniac - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 1:43pm

    That was quite possibly the funniest statement i've seen so far about net neutrality. Well done.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Re: Net Neutrality

    by out post 371 - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 2:06pm

    I can see Microsoft's new slogon for vista..... Microsoft Windows Vista the Roto-Rooter for your internets.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. Re: Net Neutrality

    by Oldbear - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 2:14pm

    LOL. Yes, maybe some senator-based draino for the "inter-web" would help

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. by Anonymous Coward - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 2:31pm

    Its important you know that the internet is not a dump truck.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Best article

    by Anonymous - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 3:03pm

    Probably the best article I have read on Net Neutrality can be found here.
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/17/net_neut_slow_death/

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. by Franssu - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 3:05pm

    Microsoft could listen to these shareholders... and issue a report explaining that they support net neutrality.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Check their business partners

    by Verizon watchdog - Jul 26th, 2006 @ 7:07pm

    The answer to the microshareholder group is quite obvious: Verizon and Microsoft are partners. Check Verizon's DSL offer. Oh, of course there is also the bundle with Yahoo! - which just happens to be a Microsoft partner. Net neutrality is not possible with such partners, and those are the "partners" customers have to deal with in many region of the country if they want DSL.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. by Sohrab - Jul 27th, 2006 @ 12:32am

    well Microsoft can create a new program that pushes the race horse through the tubes that are clogged

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. What are you afraid of, Mike?

    by n00b - Jul 27th, 2006 @ 9:40am

    Sounds like TechDirt and Microsoft are afraid to actually show a sound, studied rationale for supporting "Net Neutrality." Why bother when you can live off of pathetic emotional claims like "Tollbooth on teh interwebs!" or "Craigslist will be blocked!"

    It's so funny to hear you whine about this. "Now I've seen it all." Yes, heaven forbid a company actually be forced to explain its reasoning to its investors. If there's such good reasoning behind it -- as opposed to just being a selfish move by megacorps like Microsoft and Google -- then let's see it. Step into the real world, stupid ninja videos on youtube.com just aren't gonna cut it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It