The law only pertains to public schools and does not prohibit parents from deciding what a child may read. The material is available in the public marketplace.The plaintiffs intend that sales of the books should be restricted in the public marketplace. Either they must be removed, or they must be put in a special segregated section where minors are not allowed to shop.
I’m not complaining.You are ever furnishing a pretty darn good imitation, then.
pretty sure their turn signals have been on a similar modelNot so sure about that. I think that turn signals are illegal in NJ, and the vendor may simply be assuring compliance.
become a single-party state firstNot sure why you would need a single party state to become a corrupt and oppressive dictatorship. Explanation might have been appropriate. That said, we have pretty effectively achieved one-party control in Florida.
The motto of police states everywhere: ``Your papers, please.'' Endorsed by the U.S. Supreme Court, Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court, 452 U.S. 177 (2004).
Not sure why technology moves backward, but the old site allowed you to flag spammy comments without needing javascript (firefox 78.4.0esr, linux 5.4.72-gentoo). New site does not. Are the folks at the new site unable to find the code from the old site so as to accomplish the same things we were doing years ago?
The problem is not police but police protectionism.Yeah, police protectionism goes with police. It is generally spelled ``Fraternal Order of Police'', but sometimes the union has a different name. Almost always, though, it is to the same effect: they never saw a beating or killing by police where they would not defend the officer.
statements of fact are actually defensible as the truth (in the UK, at least)Yes, though sometimes the UK judges even require good motive. That used to be the law here in the States as well. Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250,254 (1952). Fortunately we have finally realized that the burden ought to be on the plaintiff. If he is to show that he is defamed, he needs to prove up
“liar” seems like the better starting point.Yes, and based on the popular vote the last two times he ran, ``loser'' seems like the appropriate ending point.
breaking and entering and theftAs to the B&E, I doubt it. There is nothing in there suggesting breaking and entering. Rather, it appears that the owner was compelled to admit the judge into the house after the judge threatened arrest for contempt if she was not admitted. Theft, yeah, that is pretty obvious. Taking personal property with the intent to deprive its owner of its use and value is obvious on the face of it. This is illegal in many jurisdictions, a rule dating back to antiquity and once codified as ``Thou shalt not steal''.
The story sounds similar to Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), though it is a nosy cop breaking in rather than a nosy neighbor. Not sure what led the nosy cop to break in, so there may be a backstory to make this the same case. Note that Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) overturned Bowers based on a right of privacy, which has recently been held not to exist. Those of you doing HCAN in the home should be very circumspect about it.
The selling point was to protect crime victims from harassment or other consequences attendent to the reporting. Sounds almost plausible, I suppose, though in the newspaper column I expressed some skepticism back in 2018 when it was on the ballot. Criminal charges generally require the state to prove up some facts. They are expected to show that the defendant did or refrained from doing certain things to or for the victim. The defendant may want to show that the state's claims are prime porkies, perhaps by showing distance from victim or compliance with required performance. If the victim's identity is concealed, then the state has an unfair advantage. You cannot prove that the victim never suffered an injury, if you cannot first identify the victim. So much for due process, it is now more a matter of hide-the-ball. The idea that a state actor can be a victim entitled to privacy is ludicrous in the first place. But it is part and parcel of Florida protection of the powerful. Want to know if the city manager owns property and lives in the city? Good luck with that, it is confidential. Same for finding out who the cops are that host noisy parties. It certainly makes chains of title more difficult to determine.
[UK] tend not to have a high per capita population of birthers or alt-factersBoris Johnson had so many alt facts that he had to abolish the tradition of resigning when caught lying to parliament. Perhaps the strange resemblance to the U.S. cheeto-faced ferret-wearing shitgibbon was more than skin-deep.
while the US custom of adding “sales tax” to the advertised price became a first step for scammersThe second step is the “enhanced amenity fee” at some shopping areas, such as One Daytona. I understand that there is some small print on the doors to warn the marks, but the chances of the marks actually seeing it seem small. Everything you buy there is supposed to cost an extra 1%, which goes to the owners of the complex. Just in case the tens of millions in tax subsidies were not enough.
It is relatively easy to paint a yellow capsule on a wall. Several, even. Yeah, you need a little talent for painting, but your physical requirements are not great. The problem is that it is much more difficult to stamp out plastic toy minions, if you do not have an appropriate factory. So when kids, encouraged by the ``free'' murals, want the toys. the parents will wind up going to vendors who stamp out licensed goods. A smarter mouse would have probably operated on the same theory: easy to paint grey circles on a wall, difficult to stamp out branded goods.
Viewing the facts
don’t we have soda bottles in liters?Yes, and that was generally harmless. It does not entirely displace 12-oz cans, or 16-oz bottles, though the glass bottles are fairly rare now. On the other hand, we also got metric liquor. A fifth shrank to 3/4 liter, but the price was unchanged. Half-gallons shrank to 1 3/4 liter. Pints and half-pints also shrank, with no corresponding price reduction to the consumer. Other people have observed the difficulties of working on cars where many of the nuts and bolts are odd metric sizes rather than standard SAE sizes. I cannot dispute their objections. Metric sizes also show up on bicycles, for no good reason. Many years ago, I had an office in the Carolinas and I occasionally made calls around the two states. I remember that about half-way back through SC, there was a metric speed limit sign on I-95. It was hard to be sure, because it had served the appropriate metric purpose of being used for target shooting. It seemed as though there was as much bullet hole as there was sign. I wonder if we might put whoever decided to break ``preview'' (firefox, linux, no javascript) out there next to those lonely metric signs along I-95, assuming the signs are still there.
There are some environments which are so toxic that it is unsafe to operate there. I would have a hard time believing that India, with its present dictator in charge, is not such an environment. Having people there means having people exposed to the whims of an unstable despot. Twitter's money may also be exposed to government rapacity. The main benefit of having offices in India is that it saves on postage when paying Indian taxes. The internet crosses borders. Indians could tweet just as well if the Twitter offices were in Pakistan, or in San Francisco for that matter.
Electrons Know No National Boundaries