So, yeah, I'd say on one hand that it's nice Senator Cassidy is railing against Kennedy like this for all the unmitigated and horrifically dangerous decisions he's making. But hey, you know what would've been even better? Not being the deciding vote in the first place, jackass. Rail all you like, Cassidy; what's happening, and the resulting blood, is still on you. So you're free to go fuck yourself, champ.
It's kind of sad, since I still remember years and years ago, shortly after Netflix started the streaming side of its service, there were news reports about piracy going down, since what Netflix offered was arguably so much more convenient. But, then of course, everyone had to start their own streaming service, gatekeep their stuff behind it, and then Netflix got greedy and enshittified, and here we are.
Golly, it's almost as if if they didn't want a bunch of people calling in complaining about this, they SHOULDN'T HAVE PUSHED STEAM AND ITCH AROUND. Which reminds me; I need to call in myself, and their 'auto-response' can bite me.
In that case, please let us know any specific examples of said 'plainclothes ICE agents' arresting these so-called gang-bangers, since everything reported so far has been completely innocent citizens, like Rumeysa Ozturk. Or, maybe, you can shut your Nazi-dick-sucking mouth.
Yes, and WotC, a company already known for especially terrible decisions regarding 'IP protection', rescinding the DMCA request totally goes back in time and stops it from happening in the first place. And as Geigner also said, I'm sure 'now that this is all going public' didn't affect things either.
Yeah, I was personally thinking going down to the comments, 'So, wonder how many comments down it'll take for someone to bleat out "ELON DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!"'. And here we are. Especially sad when you consider the original concept was pretty pathetic from the beginning.
I can't help but wonder: if they had 52 total devices they seized from the defendant, what could possibly be on the phone and tablet that would further add to what they already had? This more feels like the usual nonsense of police going completely insane because they know they can get away with it.
To quote the esteemed Zach de la Roca, 'They don't gotta burn a book they just remove 'em', yes.
This definitely isn't going help to keep anyone on Twitter, especially in terms of the 'automatic scraping' for Grok; I can't imagine any artist still (somehow) on there wanting to stay. For which I'm thankful; I'm tired of artists I like to follow seeming to primarily post there. I'm also rather curious to see how this new 'block' change works with both Google Play and the Apple Appstore; I'd assume that it still follows the rules, but maybe not.
Honestly, I came to Techdirt this morning to see if there was any mention of Nintendo's intensely dumb lawsuit against Pocketpal for 'patent infringement', though this article feels intensely timely in regards to that.
... I'm starting to think that we seriously need a thorough political scouring of our entire court-system if we're ever going to seriously rebuild this country. I mean, how many judges are just completely out of step with... everything?
Honestly, my first thought reading the headline was 'Why in the endless fucks did anyone suggest Newsom as a replacement for Biden again?' Thank Gilgamesh that whole thing got gloriously sidestepped and then some...
That's just it, though: it's not just 'unwanted privacy concerns', but as Mike has mentioned in the past, how do you specify 'bad actors' in a way that doesn't allow for that label to be applied to otherwise innocent groups?
That's honestly how I've felt for a while myself, to be honest, since my childhood was... less than pleasant in that regard, due to my 'less-than-normal' personality. And interestingly enough, it was when the Internet took off and I was able to engage with people more on my wavelength that I started to feel a lot more comfortable in my own skin and gain some self-confidence. So when Mike mentions the downsides to restricting access to social-media for teenagers, I can definitely relate.
And to think on Bluesky, I mentioned that we may need to start a pool on how long it takes for this sort of story to come up before someone comes up with a 'no, you're wrong!' response... and, well, here we are. At any rate, yes, champ, your response is based on total reality, and isn't at all completely inaccurate. Good job. I especially like all the expertly-presented research to the contrary regarding Masnick's point; it should truly make us all think.
Tell me, is there a major difference in taste when it comes to shoe-polish, or is it all kind of the same? I'd assume you'd have a distinguished palette at this point with all the boot-licking and all.
Yes, it's amazing how much people will deny the existence of something that's not happening... unless you have any kind of evidence to back up your claim. But you may as well say the medical professionals in question are in the pocket of the Unicorn Mafia.
but I DO know that the situation reminds me of the paradox of tolerance…Ah, to save Mike a bit of stress having to deal with this again: use of Karl Popper's 'paradox' should be done carefully, since it's so easily misunderstood. (Which I admittedly have done myself in the past, including a certain famous picture/comic that is usually the source of the confusion.) As for the Brazilian court's decision, as Mike mentioned, disregarding Bolsonaro being a [i]complete bellend[/i], this isn't the right way to go, so you could say that Musk is right to do this... insofar as he's potentially 'required' to do anything. Not that it changes the main point that Musk is a massive hypocrite, of course, which he definitely is.
One would think an otherwise upstanding law-enforcement unit would do something wacky, like, say, get a warranty for the SPECIFIC deposit-box that their target owns, rather than do a broad 'smash and grab' like this, but that would presumably involve actual investigative work. This was essentially the equivalent of saying 'We think the killer's on this block' and then breaking into everyone's houses there hoping to find them. Also, I can't help but ask why the hell civil asset-forfeiture is still a thing, but we all know why.
Interesting point
That's something I've idly wondered, even though I'm not normally one to speculate on matters like this with little evidence. In this case, though, if the shooter's goal was, in fact, to take out 'ICE agents', then they either are an incredibly terrible shot... or that wasn't their goal at all. And miss me with this 'Anti-ICE' nonsense; we already went through this with Robinson and Kirk's assassination, and we know how that turned out.