I've noticed how anyone who is conservative or right of centre doesn't give a damn about anything but that enormous pile of money they worship.
Clearly, painting 50% of the US population as evil with one brush stroke is an entirely rationale position founded in fact. Now all we need is some birther to come in here and claim that "'dem liber-UH-ls are destroying our country!", and the ignorant, partisan, internet hackery will have come full circle.
SWAT Team Guns Down Marine
He survived two tours in Iraq, but a SWAT team filled him full of holes. What chance do you think you have?
Sadly, the ends justify the means.
Then the constitution means nothing and we should stop pretending.
they license their content to all sorts of internet music businesses.
At rates that threaten to put those businesses out of business? Yes, great adaptation on their part.
We need to register wikileaksleaks.com ASAP!
"The Hunted". That was a good episode, actually.
. . . how we pump billions into new fuel sources and yet subsidize gas companies at the same time.
I support this. Remove all these indirect taxes and just tax people for what they actually use.
Man, I wished they applied the same logic to all IP cases.
"You say he downloaded a song? What are the actual damages on that? Defendant, you owe the RIAA one dollar."
Let's get this straight. The patent system is designed to protect innovators from copycats. And someone got a patent and then sued a copycat. It must be a slow news day for you, Mike.
What if it wasn't even a valid patent lawsuit in the first place, but was just filed to scare off investors?
Yet more proof that bacon is impossible to resist! I wonder if it would be good with tilapia . . .
There is still a huge pay gap for women doing the same jobs as men
Not if you account for all factors, iirc. If you look at women who are career-oriented and childless (i.e. like most men), you find that women make more for the same job.
Seems like it wouldn't go very far due to the Supremacy Clause (if we assume that there is a clear mandate for the TSA to do these "searches" in federal law). If the law doesn't spell out how they must conduct themselves, and these searches are simply TSA policy, it might have an affect.
Maybe an actual lawyer can weigh in here.
You have no idea how hard it was to resist making a Zelda joke while writing this. :)
Scott Adams did not "compare women to the mentally handicapped". He simply said that the strategies for dealing with both of those groups were similar for a man, in that there was no way to win the fight.
Ironically, the firestorm of indignation that resulted from his post proved his point; from the moment he started typing, there was a hand behind a keyboard getting ready to make a federal case out of every word. He literally couldn't win.
Its not just you. That extra sentence made the comic 10x funnier.
Once again it's up to the pirates to "promote the progress". Someone "accidentally" leak a copy somewhere. We'll do the rest.
Re:
I'm not sure this warrantless search violates the Fourth Amendment. Recall that the Amendment allows warrantless searches in certain circumstances, including some administrative searches, so long as they are "reasonable." From the Supreme Court:
I think you're confusing the constitution with the supreme court.