What I love about England is what they name their birds.
There is then the matter of objective truth: DeSantis won by 20 pts and turned FL from solidly purple to deep red.That is true. And we're seeing Trans people flee the state so as not to be persecuted by the government. Also, Arizona and Georgia went for Biden in 2020 no matter how hard you may deny it.
LOL, I first thought you were referencing what a sex worker would call their clients…Or a toilet. Which–like a prostitute's client–fits the description of Elon to a T.
I don't know who said it, but it is entirely true:
CSAM is the rootkit to the constitution.
So your sources are youtube videos and an anti-abortion website. Sure, nothing unhinged about you. Meanwhile, in the real world, women are dying of sepsis because they can't get the healthcare they need. THAT'S the position you support, you monster.
We shouldn’t have blown up the Fairness Doctrine without coming up with some kind of replacement to make sure that people couldn’t talk out their asses on air or lie with impunity and face next-to-no consequence.First of all, Fox News is a cable channel and not a broadcast channel. Broadcast rules don't apply to it. Second of all, Fox News didn't "lie with impunity" as telling by the Dominion settlement. A lot of people were disappointed, yes, but they did pay the price.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cozCYJCK4Bg You're older than you've ever been... and now you're even older... and now you're even older... and now you're even older...
Fair enough.
So in other words, AI generated patents would be like steroids to Patent Trolls. (Do I have that right?)
Disney also was in the right when: 1. it claimed that Bambi was in the public domain (which wasn't until years later), and 2. it claimed it didn't base its Canuck Daredevil toy character in Toy Story 4 off of Evel Knievel. Just because Disney uses their legal acumen for evil most of the time doesn't mean they don't occasionally use it for good (when it suits them).
In terms of Speech, yes. Canada does a lot of things better than the US (the death penalty, for instance), but not speech.
You needed only look at the last 50 years of GOP policy history to see how this gambit was going to turn out.There are huge exceptions, such as section 230, though.
“new con concept” should be “new concept”. Oops.
The idea of gender is shaped by the lens of society. How do we know? There are records from various cultures that showed they had more than 2 genders. We even have records of trans people from cultures long gone. Transgender and non-binary are not new ideas.A lot of indigenous North American tribes and nations have the concept of people being ‘two-spirit” as well as a matriarchy and matrilineality (we Jews are matrilineal as well). Transdom is not a new con concept to these people but—to the contrary—a tradition.
I listened to both of these episodes, and I just want to say thanks to Mike and Techdirt for these recommendations. While my mind was elsewhere during the part of This American Life about the sinking boat off of the Massachusetts harbor, my attention was fully paid to the part about Yoel Roth and his time at Trust and Safety at Twitter. The Radiolab episode about Sci-Hub was extremely interesting too. Once again, thanks for the recommendations!
Surprised that Erdogan didn't make the list…
That doesn’t mean Canada hates speech.Yes it does.
this is a ruling from the state’s lowest court level, which means it’s certain to be appealed.As a New York State resident, let me tell you about our state judiciary: our district courts are elected. However, we have fusion voting, which means that one party can cross-endorse a candidate from another party. While this is great for truly ideological parties like the Working Families Party or the Conservative Party, a drawback is that sometimes in smaller races the Republican and the Democratic candidates are the same. This is usually the case with our elected judges. Also, while the lower courts (confusingly called the Supreme Court) are elected, the highest court in the state (also confusingly called the Court of Appeals) is appointed by the governor. Which means that the people have a more direct say in the lower courts but not the more important higher courts.
Ownership over Tenancy. I think there's definitely an advantage over paying for something to keep for yourself and have more freedoms with rather than continuously paying money to access something you don't own and can't control.
So Senator Marshall is once again making the Helen Lovejoy argument: that we should "think of the children" in spite of the cure being worse than the disease. (Oh, and Mike, you made a typo: In the third paragraph, you wrote "Study’s show". It should be "Studies show". Thanks in advance!)