Mark B.'s Techdirt Profile

Mark B.

About Mark B.

Mark B.'s Comments comment rss

  • Nov 19, 2015 @ 07:04am

    Aaron

    FYI s/Schwarz/Swartz/

  • Oct 08, 2013 @ 12:32pm

    Re: CMAF?

    How very conspiratorial... On the other hand, CMAF doesn't appear to actually do anything, except hold a handful of patents and never update a crap website whose primary value is a bunch of links to external sites on its "resources" page.

    It's offices are listed at the same address as its (presumed) lawyers, K&L Gates. Too bad Amex isn't on their client list :P

  • Jun 21, 2007 @ 01:03pm

    They already do

    Companies worldwide already pay CSIRO for their infamous Wifi patents. Buffalo was targetted because they *didn't* pay.

  • Jun 21, 2006 @ 05:13pm

    No link

    One wonders why they didn't just put the MP3 on their site behind a POST form, then it wouldn't have a URI to pass around...

  • Oct 13, 2005 @ 10:13am

    New model what?

    "but what happens when they come out with a new model with bigger capacity"

    You have to ask? 8-)

  • Oct 04, 2005 @ 08:23pm

    Google PR

    Actually, Google do now have a press release up; http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/sun_toolbar.html

    Interesting URL though. 8-)

  • Apr 26, 2005 @ 09:16am

    Overseas

    "Either way, it makes you wonder what anyone is doing sending any money to a stranger overseas."

    That's a very un-Mike-like comment, Mike! Perhaps they're buying stuff?! And what's so special about "overseas"? Is there any greater a chance of improprietary for overseas interactions than there is for same-country or even same-city transactions?

  • Apr 03, 2001 @ 07:36am

    Well

    While mega-payoffs from options are the incentive, quite often there's a reasonable level of expectation from options that all employees have. Executives in particular have, in recent years, forgone bonuses in lieu of options. So as long as these options aren't being repriced to values above this happy-point, I have no problems with this practice.

    MB

  • Oct 17, 2000 @ 07:41pm

    One Web

    Derek,

    There are many factual errors in your article, but I wanted to focus on (IMHO) the most important one;

    > the WWW is one single medium, Internet-enabled phones are another, and home Internet appliances and webpads yet others

    The World Wide Web is not a PC-only phenomena. It is an information space that spans all means of accessing it (the media you refer to).

    Sure, there's a lot of Web content that is designed to be only viewed on PCs, but that doesn't mean that HTML itself cannot be used for content for non-PC devices, nor does it mean that all existing content is unsuitable for small devices - you'd be surprised.

    The last thing we need is different ways of communicating information for different devices, as you appear to suggest above. That's hardly useful. Luckily the WAPforum (which I have represented Sun Micro on for the past 18 months) has finally accepted this (due in no small part to Sun lobbying), and is in the process of junking much of what WAP 1.x is, and finally getting down to the business of reusing the work of smart people from the IETF and W3C, and adding value in the way that you'd expect wireless experts to do so.

    MB

  • Jul 12, 2000 @ 10:18am

    Re: Are you crazy?

    Flame bait!

  • Jun 28, 2000 @ 03:07pm

    Not necessarily

    TheRegister points out that if someone else were selling these domains they'd be called a cybersquatter, but with P&G it's simply a "great opportunity".

    If their intent was to use them and then they didn't, it's not squatting. Though obviously knowing that is difficult from the outside, except that the listed names appear to be ones that P&G may have used.

    MB

  • May 23, 2000 @ 09:54am

    Users

    Nearly 7 million subscribers now.

    http://www.nttdocomo.com/source/i_m_scr.htm

    MB

  • May 23, 2000 @ 09:48am

    Solved!

    If you want to increase the effective bandwidth, decrease the range.

    Bluetooth uses 2.4GHz, sure. But devices only use a 10m radius, meaning that beyond that 10m, that spectrum is free to be used by other devices.

    MB

  • Mar 15, 2000 @ 02:15pm

    Good point

    I hadn't heard that point made before. I realized long ago that NSI had basically merged all three top level domains into one, but didn't realize it could have been in breach of contract.

    Cool. I'd love to see them taken to the cleaners.

    Could we also sue them for moving the WhoIS URL? 8-)

    MB

  • Mar 02, 2000 @ 12:00am

    Old bits!

    Not sure why this is once again getting press, but About.com made waves about this back when they were the Mining Co. Can't find any URLs for that though.

    MB

  • Feb 29, 2000 @ 02:07pm

    Wuss!

    So what is it that you don't like, Mike? The business model, or the market it's targetting. 8-)

    I say more power to them!

    MB

  • Feb 22, 2000 @ 02:28pm

    Palm

    Palm's in.

    MB

  • Feb 04, 2000 @ 10:22am

    Anti-competitive?!

    Whoa, I'm all for having eBay opening up their data formats, but *requiring* them to? That seems excessive.

    The market will decide here. If everybody but eBay (Yahoo, Amazon, etc..) used a common publishing format (eg. an Auction XML schema), then aggregator sites would effectively combine those into one big virtual auction site that would make a more formidable competitor.

    MB

  • Jan 12, 2000 @ 12:49pm

    Whisper

    Who sets whisper prices anyhow? There's way too much opportunity for corruption there.

    I think I'll create a "Mark's price", market it as the be-all and end-all of EPS metrics, and then make a killing intentionally under or over estimating and getting in early on the resultant action. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket.

    MB

  • Nov 25, 1999 @ 10:24am

    Vapor

    I have no firsthand knowledge of these guys, but with that feature set at that price, the thing won't be ready to go for a couple of years.

    Also, the battery life will approach that of a fruit fly with a deathwish.

    MB

More comments from Mark B. >>