The Devil's Coachman 's Techdirt Comments

Latest Comments (910) comment rss

  • On the post: Afghanistan Follows Pakistan In Demanding ISPs Censor The Internet

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 29 Jun, 2010 @ 02:19pm

    We all know the real reasons for their censorship

    It's because the dictators running these countries are sexually inadequate, replete with afflictions such as micro-phallus and erectile dysfunction, and this is their way of feeling better about themselves. I may have micro-phallus myself, for all I know, but I don't try to censor the internet. What's up with them?

  • On the post: ACTA Negotiators Respond To Questions About ACTA; More Of The Same

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 29 Jun, 2010 @ 02:11pm

    Why don't you just STFU with the inane posts, dillweed?

    You seem to amuse yourself by yourself regularly. You know what that suggests, don't you, jerkoff? Strident this, pissant!

  • On the post: Hulu Finally Announces Subscription Plans: $10/Month To Still Get Advertisements

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 29 Jun, 2010 @ 02:07pm

    What a stupid bunch of money-grubbing sacks of monkey shit they turned out to be. Didn't take long, did it?. Next thing you know, they'll be selling your ass up the river on the privacy front, just like most of their bottom-feeding contemporaries. Guess I'll remove their bookmark now, before they find a new way to pimp me.

  • On the post: Louis Vuitton Strikes Again: Shuts Down Art Exhibit That Commented On LV Trademarks

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 29 Jun, 2010 @ 02:02pm

    Sounds like their lawyers need a major beat-down.

    What a ludicrous bunch of schmucks their lawyers are, and the only way to deal with lawyers who abuse the legal system is to use extra-legal measures, like beating them to a bloody pulp, and possibly maiming them for life in the process. It's just so much more viscerally satisfying than something like counter-suing them. And, they may take a lesson from it, but I doubt that.

    But, as always, there simply is no justice in this world, because the lawyers have rendered the term obsolete. If someone were to unceremoniously beat the living crap out of one of these parasitic turds, I would be happy to contribute to their legal defense, assuming, of course that they actually ever get caught. No guarantees of that, is there? Lawyer whacking goes on all the time, sometimes right in the courtroom. I have no problem with that if they deserve it, which most of them truly do.

  • On the post: ASCAP Claiming That Creative Commons Must Be Stopped; Apparently They Don't Actually Believe In Artist Freedom

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 25 Jun, 2010 @ 02:22pm

    ASCAP is an organization comprised entirely of douche bags

    They always have been douche bags, and they always will be douche bags. Their parents were douche bags, and all of their descendants will be douche bags. That's the way they like it, and so far, being douche bags has worked well for them. So try to understand their total douchiness, and it will help you hold them in complete and total contempt for being such douche bags.

  • On the post: Canadian Heritage Minister Denies Calling His Critics On Copyright Bill 'Extreme Radicals'; Video Proves He Said It

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 24 Jun, 2010 @ 04:32pm

    Try not being such a twat!

    Gawd, man! It seems to me that you must be trying to set the record for the most anti-blog author posts in history here. You've claimed in the past to have a job in IT, and yet you seem to spend an inordinate of time posting here, which would lead one to believe that you can't possibly be spending much time at work, or you're just completely full of crap. When you finally have a point, please make it. Until then, just STFU, you wanking git.

    Love,

    Your Daddy

  • On the post: Yet Another Person, Upset With Search Result Snippets, Sues Yahoo

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 24 Jun, 2010 @ 04:12pm

    What do we know about this person?

    I mean, it's not likely that he is a closet pedophile, but it's not entirely outside the realm of possibility. Sounds like he may or may not have something he wishes to hide. I wonder what that might be. Perhaps a thorough investigation into his past is called for, as well as his present and any and all future activities. These days, one cannot be too sure, and as a consequence, one cannot be too safe. I say that a detective should be put on his case, just in case he might be doing something particularly nasty, like openly practicing bestiality, or indulging in deviant sex with alien mutants from other galaxies. This man frightens me! He might be the disease vector that makes humanity extinct as a result of his alien mutant sexual procivities. Or, he may just be a paranoid, yet harmless dolt. The pubic demands to know. Stop hiding facts!

  • On the post: Canadian Heritage Minister Says That Those In Favor Of Balanced Copyright Are 'Radical Extremists'

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 23 Jun, 2010 @ 03:17pm

    Canadian Heritage Minister? What kind of butt-wipe job is that?

    Makes you wonder just who he had to perform deviant sex acts on to get that kind of job. Someone needs to tell him, "Take off, you hoser!"

  • On the post: Huge Victory: Court Rules For YouTube Against Viacom

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 23 Jun, 2010 @ 03:13pm

    Then let it happen

    That would like totally rule, considering the awful crap they crank out each and every day. I, for one, wouldn't miss them at all.

  • On the post: Iran Sends Warning SMS Messages To Potential Protestors

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 16 Jun, 2010 @ 01:46pm

    Shouldn't you register as a foreign lobbyist before spewing your apologia for Iran?

    Taken at face value, your response lauding Iran as a model for other nations to aspire to is so laughably ludicrous that I should wonder if you're being sarcastic yourself. You forgot to add a fifth factual point, so I'll do it for you.

    5. Iran's government routinely jails and murders political opponents, and makes no apology for it. The same way the Red Chinese did to their "counter-revolutionaries".

    Touting the other four points you mention as something positive is totally irrelevant to the subject, and serves no real purpose other than to illustrate that you can Google worthless data about any country you wish. Gee, Iran = Persia? Guess what? There is no Persia, and they call themselves Iran, not Persia. Mentioning the physical size of it is also useless, and signifies nothing or relevance except perhaps to cartographers. Whether or not Iran was a "founding member" of the UN is also irrelevant. The former USSR was also a founding member, of an original group of five, and has quite a history of murdering political opponents on a large scale, just like Iran. The civilization that it was home to is long gone, and has been replaced by a theocracy, which is about as far from civilization as you can get, at least in the modern context.

    The last I knew, nobody who alleged voter fraud any time recently in this country was murdered by the government. They may have been mocked and disrespected by some, and perhaps challenged in the courts, but I didn't see any of them in the news videos bleeding to death on the street after being shot by a government sniper.

    So I guess my question is "What's your point?". To paint a laudatory and sympathetic picture of one of the most rogue regimes in the world? To simply dispute what I wrote for trolling purposes? Or are you actually a paid agent of Iran, which is what your post reads like? Talk about spoonfed! You parrot their party line like every government witness in the old Soviet show trials did, and I question your motives. You display obvious anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments, which is probably what your real agenda is, but I'm not going to let your pointless prattling go without reply. That's all I'll have to say on this matter. Have a nice day.

  • On the post: Iran Sends Warning SMS Messages To Potential Protestors

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 16 Jun, 2010 @ 08:56am

    Iran is just another Islamic hellhole, and should be walled off from the world.

    The fact that the populace of their dung-heap has not been able to throw off the yoke of their oppressors demonstrates that not enough of them really care to. Thus, they have earned their condition, and accepted the fate that their cornholing theocratic government has dealt them. All theocracies, no matter their religion, are equally evil, and their leaders need to be exterminated or nothing will ever improve. Frankly, if their entire country sank into the earth's mantle, I would not lose a moment's sleep over it. Just leave the oil behind.

  • On the post: Does Section 230 Need Fixing?

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Jun, 2010 @ 03:40pm

    He's a lawyer, and thus needs to be buried alive in a fire ant mound.

    But, I'm too kind. Most lawyers should be lowered from a chain hoist feet-first into a meat grinder. Very, very slowly. With their senses enhanced with stimulants, so as to make the experience so memorable. Of course, I'm not necessarily recommending that they be lowered all the way, but perhaps just to the waistline. Can you dig it? I knew that you could.

  • On the post: Would You Confuse This Couch With Humphrey Bogart?

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Jun, 2010 @ 03:26pm

    Re: Re:

    You just confused the hell out of poster 16. He has probably scratched a large and profusely bleeding laceration in his scalp by now. You heartless bastard!

  • On the post: Would You Confuse This Couch With Humphrey Bogart?

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Jun, 2010 @ 03:26pm

    Re: Re:

    You just confused the hell out of poster 16. He has probably scratched a large and profusely bleeding laceration in his scalp by now. You heartless bastard!

  • On the post: FIFA Threatens To Sue Brewery, Because Dutch World Cup Fans Wore Orange

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Jun, 2010 @ 03:22pm

    Re: Re: WTF? Soccer? Who gives a rat's patootie about "futbol"?

    I did. You must have missed that.

  • On the post: Marvel Pricing Digital Comics Three Times Higher Than Paper Copies [Updated]

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Jun, 2010 @ 03:17pm

    Six bucks for a comic book? WTF? We're surely doomed now.

    I guess the only thing that will come out of this is more proof of how the moron population in this country is growing exponentially, if any of said morons actually have the six bucks they need to scrape up. It's a frigging comic book! Nothing more! Six dollars? What kind of brain-dead loser would cough up that much for a digital copy of anything? Jayzus! I'll go out on a limb here (actually, an oak tree trunk) and say that anyone who actually forks over six bucks for a digital comic book has permanently and incontrovertibly put themselves in the top tier of candidates for the Morons' Hall of Fame for 2010 and beyond. More and more, as each day passes, I believe the movie Idiocracy was not so much a comically dystopic view of the future in the USA, but an actual documentary of the current state of affairs here. Keeerist! I'm getting the hell out of here ASAP.

  • On the post: FIFA Threatens To Sue Brewery, Because Dutch World Cup Fans Wore Orange

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Jun, 2010 @ 01:56pm

    WTF? Soccer? Who gives a rat's patootie about "futbol"?

    Why is this even a subject for discussion here, never mind publication? Soccer is possibly the most boring thing on earth to watch short of golf! Booooooorinnnnggg! Like totally! Soccer fellates orangutans.

  • On the post: Red Flags Suggest Potential E-Voting Issues In Bizarre South Carolina Election

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 12 Jun, 2010 @ 12:20pm

    Re: Re: Why overlook the obvious? This is South Carolina, you know.

    Guess we know where you're from by now, eh? I'm from what is called the New York Metropolitan Area, and we certainly have no shortage of stupid people up here. What we don't have is anything approaching the percentage in South Carolina. Having been there, and as a result having developed a desire never to return, I can speak authoritatively on the matter. BTW, the trolling hooked you good, didn't it?

    So enlighten us. Why is it that politics as usual in South Carolina is something that Groucho Marx could have made five or six movies about, starting recently with the idiot Mark Sanford, and now the hoohah over Nikki Haley? Yeah, I know they're not necessarily germane to the article, but you have to admit there seems to be a common thread. All these upright, bible-beating, holier-than-thou turds gulling the slack-jawed electorate time and time again, half the time being re-elected repeatedly despite their exposure.

    Anyone can go after stupid people anytime, but when the morons put themselves in the news, they are naturally easy targets. Try this link from the Washington Post if you need some recent history. It almost implies things are improving. Obviously, they have a way to go.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/11/AR2010061103747.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

  • On the post: Red Flags Suggest Potential E-Voting Issues In Bizarre South Carolina Election

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 12 Jun, 2010 @ 05:55am

    Why overlook the obvious? This is South Carolina, you know.

    The collective IQ of the entire state is in the low double digits, and this is just another illustration of the results of that. Why on earth should anyone care who votes for whom in that benighted state? The population who permitted this laughable insult to democracy richly and thoroughly deserver the outcome. I honestly hope they vote the moron in, and get to live with the results for years. Stupid is as stupid does, and you can't fix stupid. I suppose they will have to update the dictionaries of the world to re-define stupid.

    Stupid (adj.) 1. Behaving as a voter in South Carolina elections would.

    2. Being a resident of South Carolina.

    3. Believing that South Carolina has a functioning government.

    4. Trying to explain why South Carolina exists at all.

  • On the post: Andrew Cuomo Grandstanding Again: Threatens To Sue Social Networking Site Over Actions Of Its Users

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 11 Jun, 2010 @ 05:55am

    Andrew Cuomo will probably be the next Eliot Spitzer

    Look for him in similar headlines somewhere down the line, whether he's elected or not. All of these hypocritical politicians have one common theme - do as I say, not as I do, because if you do as I do, I can have you arrested. Just another "it's for the children" cover to mask their real intent, which is total control of what you can see and hear on the internet. Anyone who believes otherwise is a hopelessly deluded sheep, and will doubtless suffer the same fate that all the sheep led by douches such as Andy will meet, and deservedly so. More Orwellian shite from another pandering turdball politician, eagerly applauded by mindless masses of droning dolts. Glad I don't live in that hellhole of a state, which could give Louisiana some lessons in how to promote corruption. I'm sure all of his programs and projects will require the universal solution - increased taxes!

Next >>