I suspect this is a case of automating takedown requests using AI, and without any human participation in the process. We need to educate people that you cannot depend on AI to make final decisions on anything. Always have a human check its work.
He should sue his lawyer for incompetence.
We have to presume they had no reason at all to believe foul play had occurred since they havent presented anything to back that up. They just found they had someone they could take advantage of, and their abusive personalities went for it like a rabid dog.
Again, this is humans using computers. Whenever anyone implies that the computer is violating copyright they are wrong. Computers cannot violate the law. Only the humans using the computer can. So the question is whether it is a violation of copyright to use a computer to mass read the internet.
"You can’t jail a computer so the leverage is out the window." Thats irrelevant. This has never been about computers doing stuff. Its about people doing stuff "using a computer". Somehow that point keeps being missed!
They killed that goat for spite, not because the buyer wanted it that way. When these kind of people take total control it wont just be goats.
No matter what Trump does the gop will blame it on the dems.
They just dont want to admit that they have a bot that is banning people.
Civil rights were violated by the person that swung first. We cant just be saying that it "devolved" as if both sides were at fault. If you are attacked you have to defend yourself, and that does not make you equally at fault.
Assuming you arent recommending Google just give away for free the use of their API to competitors, how could a "fair and reasonable" price for access to their API be determined?
It is true though that Hitler was indicted for insurrection - just like Trump
Better be very careful if this is only skirting the law. If you tell people he cant give them money that kind of plays into their game.
I dont mind using facial recognition to catch someone, but 1 you shouldnt lie about it and 2 it should not be used as identification evidence in court. Its not accurate enough to rely on as evidence.
Its the owner that is liable. I dont see any question there.
"must include copies of the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights" All that was forbidden in one of the final admonitions of the bible. Rev 22:18 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. Just pointing out the hypocrisy of this misuse of the bible.
I read in another source that in their standard agreement if you cancel in one month you get that $400 back. If thats the truth then I gotta side with Musk on this one.
If you cant prove a crime without the defendant himself giving you evidence then you simply dont have proof. Go to trial without the phone and make your case.
Walz made a common error in legal fact. Vance was intentionally abhorrent. Not in the least equivalent.
origin
I wonder if these bible lovers realize that the 10 commandments came from the Jewish bible. Are they in favor of making Judaism the national religion?