Inspector General's Report Says Accusations NSA Listened In On Military Personnel's Phone Calls 'Baseless,' Hints At Other Misconduct
from the the-most-selective-transparency dept
The ACLU's FOIA lawsuit over documents related to the NSA's activities under Executive Order 12333 has knocked a few more pages out the agency's tightly-closed fist, most of which are related to its signals intelligence programs. Included in the released documents is an 89-page Inspector General's report on the investigation of accusations made back in 2009 by David Murfee Faulk, who alleged that NSA linguists were listening in on the phone calls of military personnel, journalists and aid workers and sharing those containing "pillow talk" with other analysts.
As for the accusations of NSA linguists and analysts listening in on phone calls of American citizens located overseas for purely prurient interests, the NSA's under-utilized Inspector General says there's no evidence this occurred. The report runs 89 pages, most of them completely withheld, but what little the NSA agreed to release indicates a lack of evidence to support David Faulk's accusations.
There are 68 pages withheld in full (and five pages that are "intentionally left blank"), so any nuance has been left on the redacting room floor, along with any other evidence of wrongdoing. A memo from the Inspector General's office hints at other impropriety unrelated to the linguist's accusations.
During the investigation of alleged improprieties at NSA Georgia (NSAG) in 2004 and 2005 and reported by a former NSA assignee in 2008, we identified some practices in [REDACTED] that are inconsistent with established NSA/CSS policies and procedures. For details concerning the investigation, see Report of Investigation Regarding Alleged Improprieties at NSA Georgia (Report of Investigation), IV-09-0003, August 14, 2009. These practices may increase the risk of mishandling U.S. persons information and, therefore, require your attention.Well, we have that report but we can't actually read most of it. There's hardly anything left but the IG clearing the NSA of the specific misconduct alleged by two NSA linguists. The IG memo lists other non-compliance issues like the dissemination of raw US persons SIGINT, as well as violations of reporting procedures and retention guidelines, but the specifics of the IG's findings remain hidden. I would imagine a legal challenge to the massive redactions in the Inspector General's report will be forthcoming. There's more self-interest than security apparent in the NSA's very selective exposures, making this exculpatory information highly conspicuous in its inclusion.