New Bill Tries To Ban Community Broadband. During A Pandemic.

from the you're-not-helping dept

Having covered telecom for twenty years, I've found there's a good shortcut to determining if somebody's really serious about fixing US broadband issues: can they admit that (1) monopolies exist, and (2) that this results in a lack of competition. The data is indisputable on this point. US broadband is heavily monopolized, and as a result is mediocre on nearly every metric that matters, whether we're talking about availability, speed, price, or customer service.

And yet, there's a parade of lawmakers, regulators (like former FCC boss Ajit Pai), think tankers and others who are, for either financial or rigid ideological reasons, still incapable of acknowledging that reality. As a result, they can't really fix the problem.

Take the lion's share of the GOP, for example. The party just spent four years gutting most meaningful oversight of America's broken broadband sector under the completely false claim that this would somehow result in monopolies like AT&T and Comcast doing a better job, expanding access, and boosting overall network investment. That simply never happened, and anybody claiming otherwise is lying to you.

Now, with Covid shining a bright light on the essential nature of broadband, the GOP has been forced to at least pretend they care about the problem. As a result, they've ushered forth a series of bills professing to "bridge the digital divide." Not too surprisingly, not a single bill acknowledges that private sector monopolization, limited competition, or high prices are even a problem.

Instead, the focus of all of the GOP's bills are focused exclusively on placing the blame entirely on the back of local governments. And while governments can sometimes be a pain in the ass to work with (not that working with Verizon, AT&T or Comcast is any real treat for governments either), the problem at this point isn't really local government. We've spent twenty years hamstringing local government authority and giving all the power to incumbent private players through a litany of policy. And the result has been: precisely the shitty, Comcast-dominated market we all know and love. "More of that," is not a serious solution.

Yes, there's the occasional example where cumbersome regulatory underbrush could still be cleared out, or common sense policies to speed up deployment could be enacted (like "dig once" legislation requiring fiber or conduit be run alongside any new highway bill). But again, the real problem isn't local government when it comes to US broadband. The real problem is regional monopolists so politically powerful that nobody on the state or federal level, often from either party, has the backbone to stand up to them. The result is a mish-mash of ass kissing dressed up as real policy.

In fact, one of the bills, Missouri Rep. Billy Long's Communities Over regulating Networks Need Economic Competition Today 6 Act, (pdf) actively tries to ban communities from building their own networks. As we've noted, such networks are an organic, grass roots reaction to obvious market failure, and they've proven to be invaluable during the pandemic. Not only do they deliver some of the fastest speeds in the country, they're a novel way to force lazy incumbent monopolists to try harder.

The Act title makes no coherent sense, as the bill would hinder, not encourage, competition. There are, of course, already twenty odd state laws, literally written by AT&T or Comcast, that hamstring community broadband. The industry has spent years trying to push for a federal ban on such local networks, for no other reason than they would harm AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, or Charter's bloated revenues.

Usually, these bans are piggybacked on the false claim that such community networks are an inevitable taxpayer boondoggle. Yet, not coincidentally, you'll never see these folks complain when AT&T is given a $42 billion tax cut in exchange for absolutely nothing. They similarly have nothing to say when billions are doled out to regional monopolies that repeatedly fail to deliver those networks. Not a peep.

One sad and frustrating aspect of America is how little it costs a company like AT&T to buy proposed legislation. For telecom giants, it's easier to give somebody like Billy Long $60,000 in PAC donations than to upgrade their networks in lower ROI areas (despite billions in tax breaks and subsidies to that end).

Real solutions for US broadband problems start with the understanding that monopolization and corruption are the reasons US broadband sucks. If you can't do that, you're not actually interested in solving the problem, you're engaged in performative fluff and nonsense. Either because you don't actively understand the market you're talking about, or you're working, indirectly or not, to help entrenched monopolists preserve the status quo.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: billy long, broadband, community broadband, competition, municipal broadband


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Samuel Abram (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 5:12am

    Real solutions for US broadband problems start with the understanding that monopolization and corruption are the reasons US broadband sucks. If you can't do that, you're not actually interested in solving the problem, you're engaged in performative fluff and nonsense. Either because you don't actively understand the market you're talking about, or you're working, indirectly or not, to help entrenched monopolists preserve the status quo.

    I think it's because the legislators and think tanks want to preserve the monopolist status quo. Without them, no campaign contributions.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Feb 2021 @ 6:46am

    Rule 728 - If a bill has a 'cute' acronym, it's unstated aim is probably to achieve the opposite.

    If policymakers spent 1/10 of the time that they expend working out the acronym on actually understanding the real problem ... well it would be a start.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Feb 2021 @ 8:25am

      Re:

      I suspect they use interns to come up with the cute stuff. I also suspect that representatives never read these bills, they just receive them from the telecom interests / PACs put the name in the proper slot, and pass them on as their own.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    rio (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 8:10am

    https://getsearch.in/

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      fairuse (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 9:09am

      Re: getsearch DOT in

      Whatever it is it acts like malware -- top result as function.

      I isolated browser and looked at site out of curiosity (I'm a cat). Yikes what a piece of FlimFlam.

      In a comment (First Word)

      https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20210209/08295446215/chattanooga-built-own-broadband-network-now- top-ranked-work-home-city-us.shtml#comments

      I believe no telco or ISP wants federal loans to communities without broadband so they, the residents, can build it. In 1936 a mile of all the components electrify one farm $2,000, now multiply by miles from grid to farm -- the farm and or co-op had to pay. After "Rural Electrification Act" cost was $600.

      Using something proven to work in one instance is not proof that it would work "out in the boonies).

      So here we are again, electric was new tech at farm level -- machines run by people instead of people trying to do more with animal power. Fast broadband (internet services) is what electric was in 1936.

      Not a rant just a little history for those who believe history needs to be revised instead of studying it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Feb 2021 @ 8:20am

    Force feed this message

    We should all send a link to this article to our president and representatives and keep sending it until they get the message.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      fairuse (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 9:20am

      Re: Force feed this message

      It will be Spam filer'd to delete.

      Use proper protocol - cover page, offer solution instead of word soup that wastes time. A couple of short paragraphs an aid will notice when looking at it.
      Can't get through the signal2noise ratio by spamming. Believe it or not mail hard copy. USPS was created to process letters to representatives way back - Ever hear of "Registered Delivery"?

      google

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    aerinai (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 9:39am

    GOP Doublespeak

    I've just come to accept any title of anything from the GOP in the last 4 years means literally the opposite...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 9:41am

      Re: GOP Doublespeak

      'Every accusation a confession, every self-claimed title a refutation of' with that lot.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Toom1275 (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 10:30am

      Re: GOP Doublespeak

      Every Republican bill does the opposite of its name/description.

      CONNECT act: prevents network competition

      Online freedom and Viewpoint Diversity act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech

      BAD ADS act: uses online advertising as a backdoor to set up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech

      Limiting Section 230 to Good Samaritans act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech

      Trump's "Preventing Online Censorship" executive order: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech

      Ending Support for Online Censorship act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech

      Ending Abuse and Rampant Neglect of Internet Technologies (EARN IT) act: use false narratives about online child porn to backdoor encryption, privacy, and free speech all at once

      Restoring Internet Freedom order: for the first time ever gives internet companies the unregulated freedom to defraud and cripple service to customers in any way they can dream up.

      Defense of Marriage Act: attacks certain marriages by preventing them from being properly recognized

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Michael, 19 Feb 2021 @ 4:50pm

        Re: Re: GOP Doublespeak

        "The Bush administration's 'Clear Sky Initiative' is perfectly named, as it does an excellent job of clearing the skies ... of birds." - Al Franken

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        PaulT (profile), 21 Feb 2021 @ 1:03am

        Re: Re: GOP Doublespeak

        PATRIOT Act - we destroy the fundamental parts of the constitution that any patriot would support

        See also: any organisation with terms like "family" in the name is usually set up to destroy any family that doesn't conform to a 50s nuclear ideal.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 9:59am

    'Regulations are great!... when they benefit us!'

    Funny how quickly legislators will go from condemning regulations and crying about how 'the free market will fix it all!' when it comes to large companies, but as soon as smaller ones start posing a threat suddenly the proposed regulations come pouring in and the 'free market' is thrown under the bus 'for the greater good'.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      fairuse (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 10:43am

      Re: 'Regulations are great!... when they benefit us!'

      All bought and paid for be telco and comca()T <<-- I tied to make a joke. Impossible to channel George Carlin.

      It does not mater which party is in or out (Trump was GOTyou }, laws are written by the lobby - music, movie, Internet and copyright.

      Current supply of high cost internet with slow speed is not changing in cities.Co-ops face the stupid bill like this one that uses emergency services as the "Child-p0rn" argument. That is enough FUD for any Mayor. This is an end run around markets that do not have laws restricting build community build.

      If state has communities that have no broadband but there is (telco or ISP) in the market "no local building of networks. Also local counts a competing with private builds. So, AT&T wireless counts as broadband supply.

      See, Congress is being paid what amounts to protection money - election year.

      There is no reason to even submit this bill. On, /rant

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 11:26am

    For all the logic

    Where in the F' do we get anyone not understanding how this works?
    For all the money paying off local and federal elected, They could have installed TONS of access.

    1 Line could install Cable TV, phone service, and internet. AND charge the person 3 times for all the service. And it should be 1 Charge for all that service.
    Iv heard a few stories of how this gets installed and its Still stupid. Connects a Fiber to a Local area, then run Copper to the residences.
    What is the problem with running Fiber that they dont have with copper? Besides Copper already being there(and not needed to be Fix in the last 20-30 years, CAN be exposed to the cold and heat, and not buried to protect it).
    Lets consider the sewer lines in most towns as access. It shouldnt be to hard to install most of the connections. Then comes the Out of town sections. that already have power lines to them, which means POLES across 90% of the areas. If they have electrical power they can have FULL service Quickly. It should not be a problem.

    OR is it something completely stupid? That the Fiber companies that make the fiber, have raised the prices to get Profit JUST AS EVERY OTHER Corp does in the USA. Love those Copyrights. Love making changes to the Process, to KEEP the copyrights Longer.

    OR is it that the current Corps Love to collect the bills, rather then IMPROVE what is already there? As has been done for the last 50+ years. Build a Good system, and Then only use the Basic hardware to keep it running. If its working DONT fix it. Dont Improve it. Dont make it so its easy to update or change, and make SURE no one else can use it for their OWN services.
    AND keep specific Tech away from each other, as they are Compatible. Make it seem that you cant Join them, and force people to pay for All the types of service, insted of 1 that encompasses all of them.
    Sounds like a car with no wheels, no motor, and you have to pay for them separate.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dave, 19 Feb 2021 @ 12:05pm

      Re: For all the logic

      Because it is much more profitable for big incumbents to just bribe politicians then it is to actually make their service better. And that is also what Wall Street wants the big incumbents to do.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        ECA (profile), 19 Feb 2021 @ 12:45pm

        Re: Re: For all the logic

        The real problem I see, is the concept that the Corps Arnt paying, they raise the money from the consumer, and raise prices more and more.
        THEY arent paying. We are. and considering this is thought to be a requirement in this nation, let alone it covers Many forms of communication from phones, cellphones, TV, Sat, and a good share of the movie distribution system. That is allot of money.
        To bad it would be a misery to Just NOT use their services.

        But if we stop using the service, could we Sue them? As we would not have easy access to police/fire/paying our bills? What things would we loose access to?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Kevin Carson, 19 Feb 2021 @ 11:57am

    Better name

    I think hired telecom sycophant Billy Long should rename this the Corporations Over restricting Networks Have Owned Legislatures Extensively (CORNHOLE) Act

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Feb 2021 @ 1:51pm

    if community broadband is a taxpayer boondoggle

    Then the current major broadband providers are a taxpayer fustercluck, wrapped in a sh!t sandwhich, dripping with apathetic greed and finally doused with forporate cuckery!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    rao ahmar (profile), 20 Feb 2021 @ 11:38pm

    Best Transport company in dubai

    We provide the best chiller vans in Dubai, This is the best company in UAE for transport no need to worry about transport, We are here to handle your transport issues, our services include chiller vans, refrigerated trucks, freezer vans, chiller truck, and other, etc. <a href="http://jawadtransport.com/chiller-van/">jawadtransport freezer van </a>

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    PaulT (profile), 21 Feb 2021 @ 1:08am

    I can't help but wonder how much this should all be fixed naturally. The majors are paying for this kind of legislation, but the main reason why community/municipal broadband is even considered is because those communities are underserved by the existing infrastructure. Usually the reason for that is because existing private sector companies don't consider them profitable to service. I know that nobody in the area I live in (where I just got a free upgrade from 600Mb to 1Gb fibre from the main national ISP, and have at least 8 options for fibre and ADSL) is considering community options.

    So, what would happen if instead of paying lawyers and lobbyists to stop community broadband, they spent the same money servicing the communities that want it?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 21 Feb 2021 @ 7:10am

      Re:

      So, what would happen if instead of paying lawyers and lobbyists to stop community broadband, they spent the same money servicing the communities that want it?

      Not much. Lobbying is way cheaper than laying fiber, so that money wouldn't go very far.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        That One Guy (profile), 21 Feb 2021 @ 11:08am

        Some people put a really low price on their integrity...

        As sad/disgusting as it is to have politicians so openly for sale it's all the sadder how cheap some/most of them seem to be to buy.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.