Location Data Obtained By CBP Comes From Phone Apps, Is Capable Of Tracking People On Both Sides Of The Border

from the what-Carpenter-decision? dept

More details are coming out about federal law enforcement's purchases of location data from data brokers. In February, the Wall Street Journal reported ICE and CBP were both purchasing large amounts of data from Venntel, using this information to track down people in this country illegally. Supposedly the data was "anonymized," which the CBP felt was enough to dodge any Constitutional concerns. Of course, the more data you have, the easier it is to de-anonymize it. And if it was truly anonymous and unable to be converted into traceable human beings, there would be no reason for ICE and CBP to be purchasing it.

This led to some Congressional scrutiny. The House Committee on Oversight and Reform opened up an investigation into federal agencies' purchases of location data from Venntel. This investigation didn't stop the CBP from re-upping its contract with the now-controversial broker and continuing to explore the edges of this legal gray area.

A couple of months later, it was revealed the IRS was also buying location data from Venntel, presumably in hopes of tracking down tax cheats. This led to Senators Ron Wyden and Elizabeth Warren asking the IRS's oversight to look into this. The Inspector General has already replied, stating an investigation is underway to determine whether the IRS's warrantless acquisition of this location data complies with the Supreme Court's Carpenter decision, which enacted a warrant requirement for cell site location data.

More documents obtained by Motherboard explain where all this controversial data is coming from. It's not Google or cell providers' towers, but from any phone app that harvests location data for their multiple Big Data overlords.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) bought access to "global" location data harvested from ordinary apps installed on peoples' phones, meaning it could track devices even outside of U.S. borders, according to a document obtained by Motherboard.

[...]

"I know I could find signals in non-U.S. territory but they may have been U.S. users/devices," a former worker for Venntel, the company that CBP bought the location data from, told Motherboard.

This explains CBP and ICE's interest in this particular data. Looking for illegal entrants gets a whole lot easier when you can start tracking them from the other side of the border. It's far more useful to these agencies than it is for the IRS, which apparently couldn't find the suspect it was looking for in Venntel's database.

This is also why CBP feels compelled to keep throwing money at a vendor targeted by a Congressional investigation and (indirectly) by IRS oversight. It's too valuable not to have, no matter what the Fourth Amendment implications are.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: 4th amendment, border, cbp, data, ice, location data, location info, phone apps


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Oct 2020 @ 2:57pm

    Been telling you, ANY corporation has it, so will gov't.

    by Tipper Theisberg (apparently have to use "AC" now instead of witty names, which may play hell with Thad's "script"...)

    And so long as used for purposes I approve of, then I approve of the use.

    You kids cannot have it both ways: tracking gadgets but gov't can't get the data.

    And specifically: you're in usual panic that ICE might stop illegal immigrants or drugs from entering the country, ALWAYS your real reason.

    You don't care beans about any person's privacy, else you'd rail at the corporations which collect it and advocate they be limited. But no, your passion for "surveillance capitalism" won't let you see even the direction of the obvious solution.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 16 Oct 2020 @ 2:59pm

      Re: Been telling you, ANY corporation has it, so will gov't.

      Yup. Seems conclusive. After half dozen tries, went right in without the name. -- Kids, I'll just put those in BOLD right in the body? Why do you keep playing trivial whack-a-mole?

      signed, Tipper Theisberg

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2020 @ 8:53pm

        Re: Re:

        There once was an out of the blue
        Who hated the process of due
        Each post that he made
        Was DMCAed
        And shoved up his ass with a screw

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Stephen T. Stone (profile), 16 Oct 2020 @ 3:42pm

      You don't care beans about any person's privacy, else you'd rail at the corporations which collect it and advocate they be limited.

      Can you show me a single article on this website where the writers have explicitly advocated for or spoke in always-positive terms about surveillance capitalism?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), 16 Oct 2020 @ 5:40pm

    If we don'

    If we don't forcibly restrict law enforcement from using surveillance tech to enforce an authoritarian regime, they're going to do it.

    So at the point we get out of our current fascist police state, we need to make sure the proverbial camel doesn't stick its even its nose in the tent, lest the camel get any ideas.

    For now, our courts love their law enforcement goons and hate the public, so it's a good time to be marketing surveillance tech to police.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2020 @ 12:27am

    You guys are fags.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.