Court Says Trump Appointee Had No Authority To Fire Open Technology Fund Board; Says They Remain In Place

from the good-news dept

Back in July, we wrote about how Trump had appointed a Steve Bannon mentee, Michael Pack, to head the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM), the organization that oversees a bunch of independent media organizations, including the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, and Middle East Broadcasting. The plan was to turn them into a state-sponsored Breitbart. That process has begun, including the recent attempt to investigate Voice of America journalists for impure thoughts about Dear Leader.

But, perhaps much more troubling to us was the desire to completely revamp the Open Technology Fund. OTF is connected to USAGM mostly for legacy reasons. It was originally spun up as a project by Radio Free Asia to help fund open source anti-censorship tools for activists around the world. The work it does and funds is incredibly important to free speech around the globe — and for unclear reasons, Pack, Bannon and friends had wanted to completely change that, taking funding away from open source projects, and dumping it into some extremely dubious closed source projects.

Soon after Pack joined USAGM he told the head of OTF she was fired, and then fired the entire OTF Board as well when they protested, and said he was appointing a brand new board and CEO. This resulted in lawsuits and even Republican Senators asking what the fuck Pack thought he was doing.

In true Trumpian fashion, Pack simply ignored Congress, and even ignored a subpoena from House Representatives to answer questions about what he’s done with USAGM. As if to poke a stick in the eye of Congress, at the very moment he was supposed to be appearing before Congress in response to a subpoena, Pack instead was opening up an RFP asking for new vendors to take over the role of OTF in building censorship circumvention tools.

A few days later, a bunch of top USAGM employees, including its Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Executive Director, Deputy Director for Operations, and Director of Management services filed a whistleblower complaint with the State Department, after they were all put on administrative leave for raising concerns about how Pack was creating real harm in destroying the ability for the various USAGM organizations to do their job. For example, one of the whistleblowers was specifically concerned about the OTF defunding, and how it would harm protesters in Hong Kong:

n. Mr. Powers raised urgent concerns regarding the impact that Mr. Pack?s spending freeze was having on USAGM?s ability to support internet freedom tools in Hong Kong amidst the ongoing Chinese crackdown and takeover of local governing authorities. Mr. Powers specifically pointed out that the spending freeze was placing USAGM?s journalists at grave risk, and that the funds needed to be released to ensure that both USAGM?s journalists and its audience were safe from surveillance and persecution. Mr. Pack?s failure to support the internet freedom tools created a specific physical danger to USAGM journalists.

For that, Pack effectively fired him.

However, there is finally at least a glimmer of good news in all of this. A few days ago, the court hearing the case about whether or not Pack could fire the entire OTF Board and its CEO and replace it with his cronies ruled that no, he absolutely cannot do that. Indeed, it’s right in OTF’s bylaws that only the Board itself can fire executives or replace Board Members:

Neither OTF?s bylaws nor the International Broadcasting Act (?IBA?), as incorporated by reference in the bylaws, provides the USAGM CEO with the removal and replacement authority Pack claims.

OTF?s bylaws presume that the Board of Directors is responsible for both election and removal of directors. The bylaws state, ?Individuals shall be elected by the Board of Directors for three-year terms upon majority vote of the Board of Directors, or as may be authorized by 22 U.S.C. 6203 et seq?.He or she shall hold office until the expiration of his or her term and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or his or her earlier resignation or removal or as may be authorized by 22 U.S.C. 6203 et seq.?

OTF bylaws also grant authority to the Board of Directors to fill vacant positions on the Board: ?Any vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors due to removal or resignation may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining Directors. The Director so elected shall hold office for the remainder of his or her predecessor?s term or until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.?

And then the court notes that the Board of Directors did not agree to fire themselves and did not agree to appoint the new board:

The Board of Directors did not hold a vote to elect any of the new directors that Pack attempted to appoint…

Section 6.12 of OTF?s bylaws contains the only clear mechanism for removal of directors: ?Any Director may be removed from office for cause by the vote of two-thirds (2/3) of those Directors present at a meeting of the Board of Directors at which a quorum is present, provided that all Directors, including the Director to be removed are provided no less than ten (10) days? notice of such meeting.?…

The Board of Directors did not hold a vote to remove any of the directors that Pack attempted to remove.

No other provisions within OTF?s bylaws modify this removal authority.

The court further notes just how incredibly damaging Pack’s weird attempted coup of OTF has been:

Pack?s purported removal and replacement of the OTF?s original Board of Directors has left OTF without clear leadership. This confusion has made OTF incapable of authorizing decisions on behalf of the nonprofit corporation that allow it to carry out its functions, including an inability to authorize funding for partner organizations or provide support for potential partner organizations.

The actions of Pack and USAGM have undermined trust in OTF as an organization. The nature of the projects funded by OTF means that partner organizations and individuals, who are often citizens of repressive regimes, could be subjected to harsh repercussions ? even having their lives endangered ? if their personal information is jeopardized. However, OTF has been able to work with these partners to promote internet freedom because it has earned their trust that it will ensure the safety of their identities and their work. This trust in OTF will continue to erode, though, the longer that there is uncertainty about the legitimacy of the leadership of the organization. Without the trust of its partners, OTF cannot fulfill its mission of promoting internet freedom efforts.

Because of the conflict created by these actions, OTF has been denied business for foreign currency payment services, resulting in increased transaction fees and additional financial burden to the organization.

These actions have caused serious delays in OTF?s ability to hire necessary staff, including delaying the hiring for six open positions crucial to the management and monitoring of OTF?s applications and projects…. The sudden upheaval in leadership also leaves the organization at risk of losing expert staff, including researchers, technologists, and regional experts. Losing such staff could compromise OTF?s ability to carry out its mission.

End result? Court says Pack has to take his fake board and go home. The original board and CEO are the rightful ones in charge of OTF:

Accordingly, pursuant to the plain language of the OTF?s bylaws, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has demonstrated prima facie entitlement to summary judgment insofar as Plaintiff has demonstrated that the original Board is the only valid board.

It then orders that the original board is the valid board, that the removals by Pack were not valid, and that his replacement board is also not valid. Hopefully this is the end of Pack’s willful destruction of important American institutions that protect freedom of speech, but somehow I doubt it will be.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: open technology fund, otf, voa, voice of america

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Court Says Trump Appointee Had No Authority To Fire Open Technology Fund Board; Says They Remain In Place”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
21 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

'Stop doing that.' '... nah.'

Hopefully this is the end of Pack’s willful destruction of important American institutions that protect freedom of speech, but somehow I doubt it will be.

Given his previous actions in ignoring a congressional subpeona I fully expect him to just ignore the court order as though it doesn’t exist and carry on, same as before, or acknowledge it and claim that it doesn’t matter because Trump put him there and as such the only authority that can tell him ‘no’ is Trump.

This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

"Today I’ve signed an executive order that asks the Department of Justice to look into the very mean things the court said about my propaganda minister…I mean, my appointee at the US GAME agency. I think the court is a member of antifa terrorists and is very nasty."

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Phyllis Inn, Public Relations says:

Great! Support the traditional three-part American system!

Which allows review of executive actions.

And FEAR the Royalists whom our founders separated us from, for tyranny like this:

UK bill set to pass today. Allows intelligence agencies (all agencies including police) the right to torture or eliminate anyone for any reason they deem necessary. No burden of proof necessary. Let’s pray for them & that a bill like this never comes here t.co/9F2NFtAFTa

sarah westall (@westall_sarahw) October 14, 2020

https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2019-21/coverthumanintelligencesourcescriminalconduct.html

Ya know that famous "license to kill" from the Bond novels? This is it spreading. And by the way, in Jolly Olde England’s real law, "kill" is legally different from "murder". "Commoners" have status not much above animals, can be killed and a person would pay a money fine at most. But to end the life of a "Royal" is murder, to be punished by hanging, and not a nice clean American neck-snap, but drawn up and choked in the most ghastly possible way, then the body to be drawn and quartered.

Gee, I’m glad we got the "royals" out of here.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

FYI: At his COVID-spreading rally yesterday, Trump admitted — bragged, even! — that agents of the U.S. government executed a man without prior due process for no reason other than they didn’t want to arrest him. Whatever issues you have with tyranny, you’re doing a shit job of pointing it out where it should matter most to you.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

No worries, as I understand it there are a bunch of really pro-second amendment people out there who’ve argued that guns are absolutely vital in order to fight back against an oppressive and tyrannical government, which executing a man simply because you don’t feel like giving him a trial would absolutely be a sign of, so I’m sure they will get right to doing that by joining one of the ongoing protests scattered around the country… sometime after they get home from the Trump rally.

genghis_uk (profile) says:

Re: Great! Support the traditional three-part American system!

It also helps if you understand the wider context that the UK bill has to operate under.
The UK is a signatory of the Human Rights Act which forbids the use of torture and extra judicial killing.

If you had read the discussion in the House, you would have seen this question being raised and the response:
"They must also be compliant with our obligations under the Human Rights Act, including the right to life and the prohibition of torture or subjecting someone to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment"

So this is not a license to kill, torture or anything else – it is intended to allow undercover agents to join otherwise banned organisations and operate on the fringes of the law but it does not give carte blanche to do anything they want.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

restless94110 (profile) says:

Rule by Judges

So the head Administrator of the Administration (Trump) does not have the right to appoint those he appoints? A judge can overrule the Executive?

It’s been known for years now that Voice of America and the others have become infected with SJW nonsense. It’s time to change that back to what it used to be and what it was started for initially.

whether the appointee plays bridge with Steve Bannon is none of any judge’s (or any writer’s at Tech Dirt) concern. When I President is elected he gets to make the decisions, free of 2nd guessing by kritarchs, which is a perversion of the American republic.

Your biased writing has truly blinded you this constant judicial activism.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Rocky says:

Re: Rule by Judges

As usual you misinterpret and conflate things to make a toothless attack. Or perhaps you didn’t actually read the article and jumped to conclusions that fit your myopic narrative?

  • Trump has the power to appoint people to positions within the Federal Government. This is not what’s discussed.
  • Trump appointed Pack.
  • Pack fired the OTF CEO and board and appointed new people.
  • The judge rightly found this to be against the bylaws.

At which point does this decision say that Trump couldn’t appoint Pack?

Rishojq (user link) says:

how to tell if a vietnamese woman likes you

Find bad reactions Between Medications

A ZResources Symptom Checker WebMD Blogs Podcasts newsletters Questions Answers Insurance Guide Find a Doctor Children’s Conditions A Z Surgeries and Procedures Featured Topics Symptom Checker COVID 19: look at your Symptoms Now Slideshow Get Help for Migraine Relief

News Experts Health News Latest Facts on COVID 19 Vaccine Boosters chronicle Does Repeat: Vaccine Resistance Is Not New Synthetic Chemical in Many Products Linked to Early Death New Drug for Early breast cancer: First up front in 20 Years Love Horror? Learn How Genetics cause Fans of Fear

Experts Community support groups WebMD Blogs News Center Dr. Whyte’s course: manage Your Cancer Risk

Featured Topics Special Report How breast cancers Changed My Life. And Me Get Our Newsletters Health tips, exposed to Your Inbox

Mobile Apps subscribers Privacy and MoreFind a DrugFind a DrugFind a DrugGroup 22Find a Vitamin Find a Vitamin Latest Drug NewsLatest Drug NewsLatest

Drug bad reactions: prior to buying KnowBy Evan Starkman

scientifically Reviewed by Joshua Conrad, PharmD on august 25, 2021

When a drugs works right, It <a href=https://www.bestbrides.net/how-to-survive-your-first-date-with-a-chinese-lady/>chineseladydate</a&gt; boosts associated with life or helps you feel better. But a drug can bring on problems if it doesn’t mix well with something else entirely you put into your body, Like another prescribed drug, A certain food, Or alcoholic drink.

When that happens, it’s called a drug interaction. It could make your medication stop working, Become less effective, Or too secure. It could also trigger unwanted effects.

The more you learn about drug relationships, The better you’ll avoid them. Here’s what you need to know.

just what are the 3 Types of Drug Interactions?

the top types are:

Drug drug interaction and communication. at this stage,this means a medication reacts with one or more other drugs. for example, getting cough medicine (Antitussive) And a drug which will help you sleep (Sedative) Could cause the two restoration to affect each other.

Drug food/drink arrangements. that is something you eat or drink affects a drug. warming, It can be dangerous to are drinking alcoholic beverages while you’re on certain medications. Some vitamins and overall health supplements interact with medicines, to boot.

Drug condition discussion. This is when you have a medical condition that makes it risky for you to take certain meds. as an example, If you have a condition like hypertension, Taking a decongestant for a cold could drive up your hypotension even more.

What Drugs Can You Not Take completely?

There are many types of drugs you must not take together, But just how, Don’t take a combination like these:

Two or more drugs that share an component. possibly you have side effects or an overdose. substances are the chemicals in medications that treat your condition or symptoms. check for them on the drug label.

Blood thinning hair drugs with NSAIDs. Your odds for an unsafe bleed could go up. NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs) Are pain medications like

medicine with antihistamines. Taking these together can turn you into react more slowly, Which would make it dangerous so that you drive or work with heavy machines.

Some other drug drug permutations that can be dangerous are:

An NSAID pain reliever with a hypotension drugA thyroid drug called levothyroxine with an acid blocking proton pump inhibitor drug called omeprazoleAn SSRI antidepressant with another medicine that affects serotonin (similar to dextromethorphan, Trazodone)A cholesterol lowering statin with antifungal and fibrate meds that may be called "azole" prescribed medication (Their specialized names are "Imidazole and triazole derivatives, They lower blood fats telephoned triglycerides.)The antibiotic clarithromycin with a type of blood pressure level drug called a calcium channel blocker.
[—-]

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...