Subject Of Unflattering News Story Gets Journalist Arrested For Criminal Harassment

from the cops-just-doing-their-job-because-someone-else-was-just-doing-his-job dept

Oh, good. Someone's trying to make journalism as dangerous as security research. A Canadian journalist who did something journalists do all the time is now facing the possibility of criminal charges for doing his job.

A Radio-Canada investigation, with a team including reporter Antoine Trépanier, revealed that the executive director of the Big Brothers Big Sisters chapter in Gatineau, Que., falsely portrayed herself as a lawyer and practised law without a licence.

Yvonne Dubé told Radio-Canada she knew nothing about the case and insisted she never represented anyone as a lawyer.

Trépanier had talked to Dubé over the phone Monday, eventually offering a formal interview request for the story before it was published earlier this week.

After initially accepting the interview, she declined it at the last moment. She instead spoke by phone.

The next day, ​Trépanier sent an email reiterating the offer for an interview.

Subsequently, Dubé contacted Gatineau police and made a complaint of criminal harassment against Trépanier.

Trépanier was arrested Tuesday evening and he signed a promise to appear in court.

Another chilling sentence follows.

The Crown has not yet decided if charges will proceed.

It seems like there should be nothing to decide. Obviously Dubé had zero interest in commenting on a story about her alleged impersonation of a licensed lawyer. Fine, but this scenario absolutely reeks of vindictive bullshit from a person who couldn't stop a negative story from being posted and felt she should spread the misery around.

Needless to say, Trépanier's employer, Radio-Canada, is deeply concerned with this turn of events. The director of its French services says he's never seen anything like this in three decades of journalism. The police likely haven't either, but they're sticking to their guns.

Gatineau police held a media briefing early Friday afternoon, where the force's director, Mario Harel, said "we have the obligation to listen to the victims ... regardless if [the accused] is a journalist, a politician, a star or an ordinary citizen."

All well and good, but requests for interviews or comments are not anywhere in the neighborhood of "threats" that should make someone "fear for their safety." It's just part of the business. Sure, it's often an unpleasant part for those who'd rather not comment on articles uncovering their misconduct, but it's not even close to criminal harassment.

If a journalist wants comments and a person doesn't feel like giving them, "no comment" is a great way to terminate these communications. A phone call and an email are pretty mild compared to hordes of journalists camping out on your street or chasing you around from place to place with a microphone in their hands. I can see how some journalists might cross the line into harassment on occasion, but the underlying facts don't suggest Trépanier did anything other than repeat his request once, using another form of communication.

Even if charges are dropped, light bulbs are going off over heads of subjects of unflattering new stories. Why not subject your perceived tormentor to a little ride and possible rap? That an arrest was the immediate result of this complaint is enough to make journalists have second thoughts about contacting story subjects for comments or interviews. When subjects start complaining they weren't contacted before publication, they have Yvonne Dubé to thank for the new normal.


Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 6:41am

    Charges officially dropped

    The DPCP already decided to drop the charges:
    http://www.dpcp.gouv.qc.ca/ressources/communiques/2018/CMP_04311_20180322_Arrestation_journa liste_RC_VF.pdf

    They also rarely publish their decisions to not press charges:
    http://www.dpcp.gouv.qc.ca/ressources/pdf/Lignes_directrices.pdf

    This is certainly an exceptional circumstance.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 7:08am

    If in my life I had experienced reporters who projected honesty and integrity I might believe the reporter to be guiltless but since what I have observed and experienced is the exact opposite of honesty and integrity my assumption is that the reporter was trying to pull a fast-one some way.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 8:20am

      Re:

      Another satisfied Fox news watcher.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:39am

      Re:

      Yeah - no need to search for corroborating evidence when you've got that 100% accurate gut feeling goin on for ya there. Simply toss that story aside because it does not conform to my world view. Nothing to see here, I must move along ... so many stories to reject.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Chris-Mouse (profile), 26 Mar 2018 @ 7:23am

    In this case, I'd say there might be grounds to investigate filing a false report to the police.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 7:37am

      Re:

      In this case, I'd say there might be grounds to investigate filing a false report to the police.

      No charges will be forthcoming if it was something the police were just looking for an excuse to do anyway.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 8:23am

    *Alleged* victim

    we have the obligation to listen to the victims

    What does that mean when there's no evidence the person was a victim of any illegal activity? What does that have to do with arresting anyone?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:20am

    See Something ? Say nothing .
    the life you save may be your own .... sheeple

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jordan, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:34am

    Report Her

    Can he now have her arrested for clearly misusing the justice system for her own end?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Michael, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:52am

      Re: Report Her

      I am not sure how it works in Canada, but in the US, if you go to the police and report someone harassing you, they are supposed to take a statement and then determine if there is something they can do.

      The person filing the complaint is actually not the problem here, it is the police officer(s) that decided that this was something even close to criminal harassment.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 11:27am

        Re: Re: Report Her

        The person filing the complaint might not legally be at fault, but trying to get a reporter arrested because they emailed you asking for comment is still the wrong thing to do.

        That said, there's a derth of details as to what exactly was communicated, both between the parties and to the police. How can you blame the police before knowing what they were told?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Aaron Walkhouse (profile), 26 Mar 2018 @ 12:52pm

          If Dubé lied to the police to get them moving…

          …then the police may press a charge of public mischief.

          If they don't do it on their own then Trépanier and CBC
          Radio-Canada can press the same charge if they want.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 2:12pm

    "feelings" crimes, feminization of society, & its weaponization

    This sort of thing happens more than we probably realize. There's been this general trend in recent years of creating and enforcing an entirely new category of crimes that unlike the traditional definition of crime is not based on a perpetrator's specific actions, but is defined by how those actions make someone else feel -- especially someone with the privilege of being born into a legally protected "minority" class.

    This is why ethnic jokes have now become hate crimes. Anti-stalking laws, originally created with good intentions, have been weaponized and are now routinely used against journalists and protesters, despite their activities ostensibly protected under the first amendment. It's not surprising that Canada, without constitutional guarantees on free speech, has been easier than the US for far-left "social justice" activists to bend to their will. But the concept of crime being defined by feelings rather than concrete actions is not just a Left versus Right issue. Police who shoot and kill innocent unarmed people only have to say the magic words, "I feared for my life."

    In an increasingly paranoid society being ruled by concepts of "safe spaces" and "micro-aggesssions" and the perception of perpetual victimhood, it should not surprise us that people who commit real crimes (or at least have something to hide) are going to shoot these poison arrows against the people who seek to expose them.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 2:33pm

      Re: "feelings" crimes, feminization of society, & its weaponization

      Yes true and it is not at all unusual for reporters to fake crimes and news so that they have something to report which magically gives them a financial incentive to be slime balls.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 4:55pm

      Re: "feelings" crimes, feminization of society, & its weaponization

      That is all very concerning, however one is naturally going to assume that you are some sort of bigot simply based upon what you have typed - amazing isn't it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 7:06pm

        Re: Re: "feelings" crimes, feminization of society, & its weaponization

        Awww, did number "one" get "one's" feelz hurt?
        Make him fly, mummy!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Mar 2018 @ 8:05am

        bigotry

        50 years ago, someone who rejected the concept of equal opportunity would get labeled a bigot. Today, someone who advocates the concept of equal opportunity would get labeled a bigot - amazing isn't it.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      David Muir (profile), 27 Mar 2018 @ 8:16am

      Re: "feelings" crimes, feminization of society, & its weaponization

      It's not surprising that Canada, without constitutional guarantees on free speech, has been easier than the US for far-left "social justice" activists to bend to their will.

      Have a gander at the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is entrenched in the Constitution of Canada. We have a right called: Freedom of Expression. That is supposed to encompass more than speech alone. Having said that, SJW folks are a problem in both countries.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John Smith, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:52pm

    The correct thing to do is just publish the story and note the case as a reason one no longer seeks comment from the subject of a story prior to publication.

    If the journalist were female, and the subject of the article male, i doubt this would have happened.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Mar 2018 @ 12:04am

    She's a victim, and is using it as a club - hitting anyone she doesn't like.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.