The Folks That Built The Internet Tell The FCC It Has No Idea How The Internet Works

from the repeal-this dept

By now the FCC has made it clear it has absolutely no intention of actually listening to the public or to experts when it comes to its plan to repeal popular net neutrality rules later this week.

It doesn't really matter to the FCC's myopic majority that the vast majority of the record 22 million public comments on its plan think it's a stupid idea. It apparently doesn't matter than over 800 startups have warned the FCC that its attack on the rules undermines innovation, competition, and the health of the internet. And it certainly doesn't appear to matter than over 190 academics, engineers, and tech-policy experts have told the agency that its repeal will dramatically harm the internet -- or that the FCC's justifications for the reversal make no technical or engineering sense.

If the current FCC was actually capable of hearing these dissenting expert voices, they'd probably find this new letter from 21 of them worth a look. You might recognize some of the authors. They include Internet Protocol co-inventor Vint Cerf, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, several designers of the Domain Name System (DNS), World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, public-key cryptography inventors Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman, and more.

In their letter, they effectively argue that the FCC's entire rationale for dismantling net neutrality protections rests on a flawed misunderstanding of how the internet actually operates. And worse, that the FCC has made absolutely no attempt to correct its flawed logic as this week's rule-killing vote approached:

"It is important to understand that the FCC’s proposed Order is based on a flawed and factually inaccurate understanding of Internet technology. These flaws and inaccuracies were documented in detail in a 43-page-long joint comment signed by over 200 of the most prominent Internet pioneers and engineers and submitted to the FCC on July 17, 2017.

Despite this comment, the FCC did not correct its misunderstandings, but instead premised the proposed Order on the very technical flaws the comment explained. The technically-incorrect proposed Order dismantles 15 years of targeted oversight from both Republican and Democratic FCC chairs, who understood the threats that Internet access providers could pose to open markets on the Internet."

Their previous, ignored warnings highlighted how the FCC's Notice for Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) includes incorrect assessments and conflation of the differences between ISPs and edge providers (Netflix, content companies), incorrect claims in the NPRM about how the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 functions, how firewalls work, and more. Instead of consulting people that actually know how the internet works in public hearings, the FCC blindly doubled down on flawed reasoning and technical inaccuracies. Why? Because ISP-driven ideological rhetoric, not facts, are driving the repeal.

The letter notes how experts aren't the only ones the FCC is ignoring. It's also blatantly ignoring the will of the public, as well as turning a blind eye to efforts to undermine the public's only opportunity to make its voice heard during the open comment period of the proceeding:

"The experts’ comment was not the only one the FCC ignored. Over 23 million comments have been submitted by a public that is clearly passionate about protecting the Internet. The FCC could not possibly have considered these adequately. Indeed, breaking with established practice, the FCC has not held a single open public meeting to hear from citizens and experts about the proposed Order.

Furthermore, the FCC’s online comment system has been plagued by major problems that the FCC has not had time to investigate. These include bot-generated comments that impersonated Americans, including dead people, and an unexplained outage of the FCC’s on-line comment system that occurred at the very moment TV host John Oliver was encouraging Americans to submit comments to the system."

And again, while the FCC may be eager to ignore objective experts and the will of the public as it rushes to give VerizoCasT&T a sloppy kiss, the fact they did so will be playing a starring role in the lawsuits filed against the agency in the new year. In court the FCC will have to prove that the broadband market changed dramatically enough in two years to warrant a wholesale reversal in net neutrality policy. But critics will have plenty of ammunition in their attempts to prove the FCC engaged in "arbitrary and capricious" policy based predominately on fluff and nonsense, not hard data or engineering expertise.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Nathan F (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 6:46am

    So, the FCC is likely going to get their way and change the rules. They are being very stubborn and covering their ears to what they people they are supposed to be protecting are saying.

    What recourse do we have after the vote takes place? Lawsuits? Senate override? Legislative action?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:28am

      Re:

      Most likely several lawsuits will be filed which will drag out a couple of years. The filers of the lawsuits will more likely than not win, but if that eventuality occurs the interested parties can just buy the laws that want in Congress.

      The bottom line is that net neutrality is sort of porked in the long term no matter what, there is too much extortion money to be made if it goes away for it to stay.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Thad, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:07am

      Re:

      There will definitely be lawsuits. And Pai hasn't done anything to make me believe he's got a good defense.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 12 Dec 2017 @ 6:47am

    If the FCC has no clue how the Internet works, why should it regulate it?

    Sorry, but to me the question is rather how it is possible that the FCC lost all clue about the Internet when Tom Wheeler got replaced by Ajit Pai.

    I mean, it just does not seem plausible that all the clue comes and leaves with a single person. What are all the others doing?

    It rather sounds like clue got a marching order. It would be interesting to find out how this affected job satisfaction at the FCC.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 7:15am

      Re: If FCC has no clue...

      Why is FCC getting it so wrong now?

      Plenty of critics have pointed this out, but there must be some basic flaw in the Federal/FCC regulatory concept that needs repair. Step back from the immediate issue, look at the bigger picture... and figure out why the FCC has detoured in this direction. Effects have root causes; you don't permanently solve a problem without understanding its cause.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 7:20am

        Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

        You are completely ignoring one of the main points of the article in that they are basing these decisions off of faulty and incorrect assumptions about how the basic internet works.

        The internet never has and never will be an information service, it is, properly, a telecommunications service. The internet can be used to provide information services but it itself is not. Thus Title I is not a proper classification and Title II is.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          An Onymous Coward (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:52am

          Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

          You are completely ignoring one of the main points of the article in that they are basing these decisions off of faulty and incorrect assumptions about how the basic internet works.

          That, itself, is a flawed assumption. They're basing their decisions on what best suits the ISPs and then backfilling the "reasons" with whatever they can come up with that sounds most plausible.

          The trouble for them is that nothing they've come up with is remotely possible. The trouble for the nation is that none of that matters; We're all fucked regardless.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Ryunosuke (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:49am

          Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

          you are half right, ISP's are a telecommunications service, Google, netflix, other websites ARE an information service (or at least imo).

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:01am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

            Is that not what I said? "The internet can be used to provide information services but it itself is not."

            Internet - "a global computer network providing a variety of information and communication facilities, consisting of interconnected networks using standardized communication protocols."

            The internet is the underlying physical architecture and protocols (does not include content/information service providers such as Google, Netflix, etc...).

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              Ryunosuke (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:08am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

              what I am saying, is that Netflix and Google is as much a part of the internet as AT&T and Comcast

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:19am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

                So then what we have here is differing definitions of what the internet is.

                To clarify the definition of the internet I gave in my previous post is what I am talking about, the physical infrastructure and protocols that Google and Netflix use to deliver their services.

                And perhaps that is the problem with some of the arguments over NN. People are misunderstanding each other about what they are truly talking about. NN supporters are talking about the infrastructure alone, ISP's, we are not lumping information services into that.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:09am

          Re: If FCC has no clue...

          ...and you are completely missing the larger point raised -- Why Why Why is the FCC "basing these decisions off of faulty and incorrect assumptions" ???

          FCC is supposed to be an objective "expert" on these matter... to ensure the private communications/internet markets operate properly. But FCC is not demonstrating such expertise.

          Why Why Why ! What is the root problem here?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:37am

            Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

            "FCC is supposed to be an objective "expert" on these matter"

            Yeah - so why not put in charge someone who is not an expert.
            Seems to be the game plan for the entire administration.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            TKnarr (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 1:45pm

            Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

            Already noted: this administration doesn't want the FCC to be an objective expert, and they don't want the markets to operate properly. They want to cater to their friends/donors, so they put in representatives from their party (who make up a majority of the FCC board, including the chairman's slot) who'll do exactly that. See? That wasn't so hard, was it?

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Thad, 12 Dec 2017 @ 2:15pm

              Re: Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

              they put in representatives from their party (who make up a majority of the FCC board, including the chairman's slot) who'll do exactly that.

              The FCC has to have a one-vote majority for the President's party.

              That said, it didn't have to be Pai, and it didn't have to be anybody opposed to net neutrality. There are a lot of Republicans who favor Title II regulation, just not many of them on Capitol Hill.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        TKnarr (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:53am

        Re: Re: If FCC has no clue...

        Yes, there is a basic flaw. It's name is Ajit Pai. Or more specifically, the flaw is in the GOP appointees' desire to deliver what their financial supporters want over what most benefits the public or even what the public overwhelmingly says they want. The fact that it was only after Ajit Pai got control that things went pear-shaped should be the first clue.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      David (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:45am

      Re: If the FCC has no clue how the Internet works, why should it regulate it?

      If the government only controlled what it understood, it wouldn't control anything. There isn't a single department of the federal government that works well.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 6:56am

    This is something that gets lost and doesn't get enough attention in the larger debate over Net Neutrality. Broadband internet service should never have been classified as an information service in the first place because that isn't at all what it is.

    Moral and political arguments aside, from a purely technical perspective, the way the internet works doesn't even come close to meeting the definition of an information service. Information services can be provided over top of the internet, but the internet itself is not such a service. It is more similar to phone lines than not, especially considering that using phone lines was the only way to access the internet in its early days.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 7:11am

    The signatories are worth noting

    There are some seriously heavyweight names on that letter. A lot of people tend to think of Brin and Page and Yang and so on as representative of Internet expertise, but by comparison they're all novices who just got here last week. It's not an exaggeration to say that if you really want to understand how the Internet works, and WHY it works that way, that you should find everything those people have ever written and read it. Every word.

    Which of course what the FCC would do if they were seriously interested in understanding prior to rulemaking.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    MonkeyFracasJr (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 7:17am

    Information Service ...

    Information services can be provided over top of the internet, but the internet itself is not such a service.

    This is one of many things NN opponents are willfully ignorant of.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:16am

      Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

      A few this year, 16 month gap to only ONE comment in 2016, all of 4 in 2015... Just ODD, eh?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:29am

        Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

        What does that have to do with anything?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          PaulT (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:39am

          Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

          Some of the resident trolls are so very desperate. They stopped being able to come up with remotely convincing lies, and they didn't get the responses they wanted when they started attacking the authors of the articles personally.

          So, when faced with absolutely unquestionable facts, they've started trying to pick apart the posting history of other commenters to try and invent a grand conspiracy (while providing no way other others looking at their own history, of course). It's kind of sad, but satisfying.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:45am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

            "So, when faced with absolutely unquestionable facts,"

            yea... there is nothing opinionated about that statement at all.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:59am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

              Provide links to accurate and verifiable data/facts to prove otherwise and then we can talk.

              Until then, based on previous comments and commentators like him, this appears to be a reasonable theory given all the facts.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:53am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

                Are you folks all drinking from the same bowl of stupid?

                If I am the one casting doubt on his claims, it then becomes his job to prove his claims... not mine. Another poster child for the unlimited nature of human stupidity. People like you helped get Trump and Ajit fucking elected every damn cycle. You silly twits deserve each other.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:54am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

                  and yes, I know FCC chairman is not an elected position before someone else takes that out of context too.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:42am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

                  Ah so you subscribe to the "guilty until proven innocent" theory. Most of us here prefer "innocent until proven guilty".

                  Generally speaking, if someone casts doubt on to another person, it is up to the doubter to provide at least a few credible facts to back up his assertions, else everyone dismisses him as a liar and/or conman, and in some cases, troll.

                  If he does provide facts that would go against the current status quo, then the person being doubted is responsible for either admitting to it or providing counter facts or an explanation as to why the doubter is incorrect.

                  You have provided no facts to back up your doubts, merely said "yea...there is nothing opinionated about that statement at all". We responded with post history that can be checked and verified that confirms PaulT's assertions.

                  So, I say again, provide links to hard, verifiable facts that what PaulT says is not true. Then we can talk.

                  As it stands you have provided no facts and we have at the very least made reference to publicly available and verifiable facts.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • icon
                  PaulT (profile), 13 Dec 2017 @ 1:47am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

                  "If I am the one casting doubt on his claims, it then becomes his job to prove his claims"

                  You didn't really do that, though. You made a sarcastic comment about them being opinionated, but you didn't state a reason why they would be wrong (plus, you can be opinionated *and* factually correct, you know). So, what are you demanding I prove?

                  For someone demanding that everyone else stick to particular rules of conversation, you're bad at setting them.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              PaulT (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:03am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

              Actually, unless you have something to prove me wrong, it's a statement of fact, not opinion. Regular AC commenters here have a habit of switching various tactics when they have nothing else to say, the newest one being to whine about the number of comments someone else has made in the past. That's truth.

              This would be where you present evidence that I'm wrong rather than whining about me pointing out the liars round here.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Thad, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:08am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

            they've started trying to pick apart the posting history of other commenters to try and invent a grand conspiracy

            Not so much "they" as just one guy.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        ltlw0lf (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:27am

        Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

        A few this year, 16 month gap to only ONE comment in 2016, all of 4 in 2015... Just ODD, eh?

        Or it could be that MonkeyFracasJr has a real job, and isn't paid to troll Techdirt.

        I have been posting anonymously for a while because Mike reset our passwords due to a potential exposure of our passwords. So I haven't posted using this account since January 2017 because I didn't see a reason to log in...am I now going to be seen as ODD despite posting anonymously for most of 2017?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          PaulT (profile), 13 Dec 2017 @ 1:27am

          Re: Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

          Odd? No. A justification for his persecution fantasy ? Sure.

          Don't take it personally, he'll clearly attach his delusions elsewhere if he can't get any traction with this one.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:55am

        Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.

        Do you buy the tinfoil in bulk?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    NeghVar (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 7:25am

    Criminal charges

    The AG of New York is trying to investigate the ID thefts involved in the FCC comments. ID theft is a crime, even if there no harm has been done to the person whose ID was fraudulently used. Pai's constant refusal to release information concerning a criminal investigation is obstruction of justice which is a criminal offense. He should be arrested.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 12 Dec 2017 @ 7:57am

    I highly doubt that Ashit Pi cares on whit about how the internet works. What he cares about is how much money can be wrung from it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:10am

    Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

    First, I don't agree it's very difficult to invent protocol once have the hardware. IBM and ATT pioneered ALL the basics, so should have primary say?

    Internet Protocol co-inventor Vint Cerf: now employed by GOOGLE, so a spook.
    Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak: APPLE.
    designers of the Domain Name System (DNS): looks up text, returns #, requires only fast hardware.
    World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee: designed for spying, doesn't worry about javascript!
    public-key cryptography inventors Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman: spooks / mathematicians, should never be trusted.

    Just on surface, I don't trust any of them, because they're either Them or mere techno-bots.

    And again: all we're seeing here is the struggle of corporation against corporation.

    **Techdirt is slanting this as if We The People win by Google getting what it wants.**

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:28am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      And we've officially entered the fantasy land of outrageous conspiracy theories and accusations based on no factual evidence all while willfully ignoring historical facts.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Roger Strong (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:30am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      The wheel. Used later by the MILITARY!

      Cutlery. Used by staff at the CIA!

      Pants. Used for spying, because RFID tags can be sewn into them!

      Don't trust anyone who uses them!

      /s

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        PaulT (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:44am

        Re: Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

        "The wheel. Used later by the MILITARY!"

        Don't stop there - ARPANET was a MILITARY PROJECT! The spooks are in your computer right now, RUN!

        I suspect he's being a little insincere, but sadly in today's climate it's impossible to tell whether someone using the internet to whine about its inventors conspiring against him on the internet is meant to be satire or not.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Oblate (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:23am

        Re: Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

        I'm literally using all of those spy tools right now- chair has wheels, fork in hand (for lunch, not just randomly holding a fork), wearing pants (lucky it's afternoon here). I feel like James Bond!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:37am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      "**Techdirt is slanting this as if We The People win by Google getting what it wants.**"

      no it just so happens that what the people want an what google wants happen to align.
      Though I think most would agree that stronger NN that curbs the spying should be introduced. At which point the peoples and googles wishes will no longer be aligned.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:39am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      Oh look, another one. Dosen't let his ignorance of the subject limit his mouth.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      PaulT (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:41am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      So, do you have any experts that you would trust, or is everyone who was involved in creating the very medium you're using to attack them suspect?

      If nobody, why are you even here? Aren't you being spied on RIGHT NOW!?!?!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Baron von Robber, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:46am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      If there is a Stupid Comment of the Week, how do I vote for this one?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      An Onymous Coward (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:57am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      OMG! You're right! You should stop using the internet in any of its forms immediately! You can't trust any of them!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:55am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      lol

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:56am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      I wasn't going to respond further to this but it's just so absurd I just couldn't let it go.

      "mathematicians, should never be trusted"

      You do realize that everything in the world, even nature itself, relies on mathematics in some way shape or form, do you not? Heck, music theory is completely mathematically based.

      If we can't trust any mathematicians, then how the heck are we ever supposed to be expected to live in this world? I suppose you disagree that 2 + 2 = 4? Or how to find the area of circle? Because a mathematician came up with those.

      Heck, you use math everyday in managing your finances, which potentially makes you a mathematician using principles developed by other mathematicians. I guess that means we shouldn't trust anything you say.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:58am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      Techdirt is slanting this as if We The People win by Google getting what it wants.

      The really funny thing about this is that Google hasn't been fighting for real net neutrality for years. It helped write the bad 2010 rules that got thrown out in court, and the company more or less sat out the 2015 rulemaking and is sitting out this round as well. Every once in a while they make a quiet statement here or there, but they've been almost totally uninvolved.

      Google would be fine if NN is killed. In fact, it would thrive because it would have advantages over everyone else since it can cut deals with the big ISPs. So if you really hate Google, you should be for Net Neutrality.

      Of course, the fact that I'm advocating for a position different than Google's is one that our trolls can't seem to process, so they have to pretend that whatever I say must also be Google's position, even though it's not.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:54am

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      Nice troll. But...all of these people knew more about the Internet thirty years ago than you know today. And given your obvious cognitive limitations, you're never going to catch up. Inferior people like you are often jealous of those equipped with superior minds, so it's not surprising you're feebly lashing out.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 4:49pm

      Re: Let's look skeptically at your list of "experts":

      And your solution is to let the RIAA get what they want. Fuck that noise.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:42am

    Well...

    This is regulatory capture after all. Told you it was coming. many times.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:46am

      Re: Well...

      Oh hai!

      Was wondering when you would show up and spout off some more regulatory capture nonsense.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        cpip, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:04pm

        Re: Re: Well...

        This is pretty much the textbook definition of regulatory capture -- "a form of political corruption that occurs when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or political concerns of special interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating."

        The argument IS that Ajit Pai is in the pocket of the ISPs and advancing their goals rather than what's best for the people, no?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:18pm

          Re: Re: Re: Well...

          The fact that Ajit Pai is in the pocket of ISP's? No, I think the case can be fairly solidly made for that.

          It's all the other stuff he spouts off about, like the entire FCC being in regulatory capture from it's inception and that regulatory capture is what it was created to do in the first place.

          For some reason he thinks that all our problems would be magically solved by completely doing away with the FCC as a whole.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:30pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

            "It's all the other stuff he spouts off about, like the entire FCC being in regulatory capture from it's inception and that regulatory capture is what it was created to do in the first place."

            Hmm... hey look, no one saw that lie coming. If you could just stop lying we might get farther down the road.

            "For some reason he thinks that all our problems would be magically solved by completely doing away with the FCC as a whole."

            O wait... not just one, but two lies. This is why people don't believe you. The only game you got is to constantly misrepresent people, and its terrible.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:43pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

              My apologies if I have apparently mistaken you for someone else. It is not my intent to misrepresent people.

              I take it you are claiming you are not the same person I and many others here have debated with constantly on the last few NN articles in which said person has claimed all the things I said and this can be verified by reviewing those comments.

              If you are not this person I am deeply sorry for the mistake, your comment style is very similar to his so I assumed it was the same person.

              Please accept my apologies. However, even though what I said does not apply to you, it does accurately reflect the other poster I was talking about.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      An Onymous Coward (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:59am

      Re: Well...

      No, this is Corporate Capture. And zero people give a rat's ass what you said.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 9:55am

        Re: Re: Well...

        wait... so when I say it... its wrong... but when TD says it... well no big deal.

        https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20171206/13482138756/india-embraces-full-net-neutrality-as-us -turns-back-concept.shtml

        You see... this is why you are an idiot. The only thing that matters to you is WHO said it. Makes is clear you are nothing other than a knee-jerk reaction idiot.

        Go and read up what regulatory capture means brain child.
        Like Einstein said... only two things are infinite... the universe and human stupidity (YOU) and he was not sure about the former.

        You are a stupid human, on a the bright side, you can fix that... if you can just put down the kool-aid!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Baron von Robber, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:23am

          Re: Re: Re: Well...

          "You are a stupid human, on a the bright side, you can fix that... if you can just put down the kool-aid!"

          You owe me a new Irony-O-Meter.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:50am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

            I would wager you broke it long before you read any of my posts.

            The FCC is currently in text book "regulatory capture" a claim that even TD agrees with based on multiple articles.

            Are you saying that the FCC is NOT in regulatory capture right now as well?

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Baron von Robber, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:19pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

              No, just that the stupid train is backing over you again.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:28pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

                Yet I seem to be doing fine.

                I don't care if NN lives or dies. Nothing much is going to change either way.

                the problem is that you are too stupid to know any better and you resist any form of enlightenment.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • identicon
                  Baron von Robber, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:37pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

                  Well, let's see. Prior, my ISP couldn't mess with my connection to the internet beyond bandwidth.

                  Now......let's see.

                  Did your father ever get that apology letter from the condom company.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • icon
                  PaulT (profile), 13 Dec 2017 @ 1:37am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

                  "I don't care if NN lives or dies. Nothing much is going to change either way."

                  You tell yourself that. Just don't come running to the people who told you what would happen when you realise it's too late to stop it.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • identicon
                    Anonymous Coward, 13 Dec 2017 @ 8:26am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

                    The funny thing is that Paint Eater Texan's entire shtick is to gloat about his presumed scenario where other people come running to him because he thinks he's right.

                    Five years ago he'd probably say the exact same thing about SOPA.

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:53am

          Re: Re: Re: Well...

          And here you are to show up like the clap on an otherwise good date.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:07am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

            yes I know, you would prefer a good date with a bad case of the stupid.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 12:46pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

              once your head's gone I got first dibs on your throat hole...

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 1:31pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well...

              Well... you tried for an insult. I’m sorry all that lead poisoning has taken such a cognative toll. It is brave of you to soldier on in spite of such a terrible handicap.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 8:52am

    I wonder...

    ...Perhaps Ajit Pai is actually for NN? Think about it for a moment.
    Here's a guy who really hasn't hidden his agenda about removing NN. His kowtowing to the big ISPs is so obvious as to be almost criminal. He has completely ignored everyone except the ISPs as far as comments are concerned. He's even participated in a "parody" claiming to be a "plant" for Verizon in a long game. It is now to the point that many people are gleefully looking at his antics and saying that the repeal of NN should actually fail in court.

    Maybe that was his plan all along? Maybe he truly understands that NN is good and that the current "rules", while not perfect, are pretty good. Maybe he is behaving this way precisely so that he *will* lose in court and he can then turn around to the big ISPs, shrug his shoulders and say, "Well, I tried. Sorry.", thus allowing him to still receive a cushy appointment at the end of his term while at the same time saving NN without appearing to do so.

    Well, if I'm going to dream (or hallucinate), I want a unicorn that farts gold coins as well, please.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    David (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 10:52am

    Misunderstanding the problem

    What everyone seems to misunderstand is that the government no longer works for the people. It works for big business. It is business that provides the funding that gets these people elected and business expects a return on their investment. Liberal or conservative, it doesn't matter. That is why the Founding Fathers wanted to limit the federal government.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Thad, 12 Dec 2017 @ 1:07pm

      Re: Misunderstanding the problem

      Liberal or conservative, it doesn't matter.

      It does in the case of net neutrality, which, in Washington, has become a partisan issue (even though among the general public, it's not).

      That is why the Founding Fathers wanted to limit the federal government.

      You seem confused about what is actually happening here. Ajit Pai is acquiescing to the will of corporate America ("working for big business", as you put it) by overturning federal regulations, not creating them.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Someone, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:02am

    Hmmmm

    So far i've cared enough to actually read the existing net neutrality documents, and i've gotta say that both sides have a point. The opposing side has a point that the current net neutrality needs some heavy editing and rewriting because a lot of content is opposite of what should be defined as net neutrality, while the defending side has a point that it shouldn't be repealed (since it's a basis at least) while the defending side should also develop some brain matter and read the documents they are defending before they defend them (i'm looking at illiterate reddit and such).

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:14am

      Re: Hmmmm

      Agree, neither side has much brain matter.

      NN still allows for Zero Rating which can be and will be gamed by the ISP's and these guys are claiming that NN is some kind of panacea for all their NN woes. They are too easy to fool, by both sides!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        That One Guy (profile), 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:44am

        Re: Re: Hmmmm

        No, only the idiot strawmen(in both senses of the word) people in your head hold to that position.

        If you bothered to stop patting yourself on the back for being The Chosen One long enough to read what people's actual positions are you'd realize that no-one thinks that net neutrality rules are some magical cure-all that will solve everything, and things are a bit more nuanced than you portray them as.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:49am

        Words inserted into mouths

        @Anonymous Coward
        You realize you just insulted yourself and admitted that you don't have much brain matter right? Since you are on the other "side" from us who want to keep NN rules. Perhaps you should refrain from insulting other people. You don't seem to be very good at it.

        No one has claimed it is a panacea. What we have said is that there will be dire consequences for the health of the internet if it is repealed. No one, not even TD, has argued that these rules will solve all our problems. Many, including TD have lamented that the NN rules DON'T include rules against zero rating.

        @Someone
        I would be curious to know what specifically you think should be re-written and what is improperly defined as Net Neutrality. As I read the rules I didn't see anything that jumped out at me as being misclassified but your argument is one I haven't heard before so I'm interested to hear your thoughts on it.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        PaulT (profile), 13 Dec 2017 @ 1:35am

        Re: Re: Hmmmm

        "these guys are claiming that NN is some kind of panacea for all their NN woes"

        Who is? I keep seeing claims like this, but never see any evidence to support it. I've never seen any defense of NN like that, only "what we have is a hell of a lot better than nothing, and we need to keep it).

        The fact is this - NN in its current form is a band aid, a patch, not a perfect fix. The rules need to be updated, revised, maintained to remove loopholes like zero rating that are able to be gamed in violation of the spirit of the rules, and any future loopholes that appear.

        But, they're vastly better even in their current form than removing them and handing the American internet over to corporate monopolies, as Pai and his band of robbers are attempting to do.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    junkyardmagic, 12 Dec 2017 @ 11:50pm

    lets hear it for th fcc

    In contradiction to all your doom sayers, I'm really happy with what the FCC are doing. Along with everyone else working in technology dependent industry outside the USA, I'm really happy for the for the competitive advantage they've gifted us.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      PaulT (profile), 13 Dec 2017 @ 1:51am

      Re: lets hear it for th fcc

      Heh, actually that might be the way to kill this mess. Don't get American tech professionals opposing it, get Indian and Chinese corporations congratulating them on the big win they're going to be handed. That would probably turn opinion round.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Dec 2017 @ 2:25am

    I'm sorry America, its time to bend over and grit your teeth - this is gonna hurt and there's nothing you can do about it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Dec 2017 @ 4:45am

    Autocorrect

    "...the FCC engaged in 'arbitrary and capricious' policy..."

    Did you mean "bought and paid-for"?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Dec 2017 @ 8:50am

    "flawed misunderstanding"

    No, no - it is a very good and proper misunderstanding.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Dec 2017 @ 12:40pm

    Sufficient CV to work for FCC: "I have no idea how the Internet works".

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.