All Quiet On The Tech Front As The Clock Ticks Down On Section 702 Renewal

from the a-little-help? dept

Things have been mostly quiet as Congress heads towards the possible renewal of Section 702 surveillance powers. The NSA, oddly, made the most noise by dropping its "about" collection because it simply couldn't (or wouldn't) stop harvesting US persons' communications. As usual, privacy activists are sounding the alarm but the general level of noise at the Congressional level is nothing compared to the runup to Section 215's renewal.

Quieter is better for the Trump administration, which has already expressed its desire for a clean reauthorization. There are plenty of surveillance hawks who would rather no one messed with the approval process and a few of those have the power to stonewall any legislative reforms that might make their way to the House or Senate in the coming months.

But the noisiest silence is emanating from the tech sector, whose platforms and services are integral to the NSA's harvesting of internet communications and data.

Facebook, Alphabet's Google, Apple and other major technology firms are largely absent from a debate over the renewal of a broad U.S. internet surveillance law, weakening prospects for privacy reforms that would further protect customer data, according to sources familiar with the matter.

While tech companies often lobby Washington on privacy issues, the major firms have been hesitant to enter a fray over a controversial portion of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), industry lobbyists, congressional aides and civil liberties advocates said.

Some of this could be due to the fact that some surveillance activities happen without any direct assistance from these companies. The NSA also pulls communications from internet backbones and taps on transatlantic cables. Speaking up against this surveillance may subject companies to additional demands, rather than allow them to go comparatively unmolested.

Other contributing factors are mostly business-related. Interfering with collections (or their authority) may make the worldwide transmission of internet communications a bit more hazardous, especially if the NSA's collections run afoul of foreign privacy laws.

The companies' relative inactivity is explained by several legal challenges in Europe to an agreement between the United States and the European Union, known as the Privacy Shield, the sources said. The litigation hinges on whether U.S. surveillance practices afford enough privacy safeguards. A coalition of human rights organizations has urged Europe to suspend Privacy Shield unless Section 702 is substantially reformed.

U.S. technology companies have privately bristled at those efforts, three industry lobbyists [said], in part because expectations that 702 reforms will pass Congress are low.

"If you link them and you lose one, you lose both," said one of the lobbyists, who like the others requested anonymity to discuss private conversations with technology companies.

Rather than step into the fight, tech companies are on the sideline, holding their collective breaths. The chances of serious reform are minimal, what with the President preferring a clean re-auth. If the European Union decides the United States isn't taking foreigners' privacy seriously, it may act to block collections by booting American tech companies out or requiring sequestered servers that can't be reached by American surveillance efforts.

Obviously, neither outcome works for the NSA either. It needs as much cooperation as possible from foreign partners in order to elude privacy protections the US extends to other nations' citizens. Casting its net in international waters muddies jurisdictions, as do information-routing efforts like Google's that send communications from server to server based on efficiency, rather than country of origin. Relying on foreign intelligence agencies' intercepts also helps both partners evade local restrictions.

The Fortune article also notes there's a distinct lack of clarity to the Section 702 debate at this point, one that doesn't encourage any company to open its mouth when there's billions of dollars of services on the line. Some privacy activists hope this changes as the debate moves forward, but considering the programs aren't directly affecting Americans (unlike Section 230's domestic collections), it's a harder sell. No one is asking for the collections authorized by this statute to be shut down completely. Even ardent privacy activists admit the programs are more targeted and more respectful of Americans' privacy. The problems lie in its oversight, of which there is very little, and other authorities (Executive Order 12333, for one) that aren't open to debate or periodic renewals.

Despite these possible explanations, the silence isn't exactly heartening. Tech companies made plenty of noise when the Snowden leaks hit, exposing multiple programs that gathered communications from international cables and service providers. But they've said little since, at least in terms of Section 702 programs. Many are fighting for users' privacy in court, but those efforts deal with demands from law enforcement, rather than surveillance programs that bypass regular courts completely. If the level of noise doesn't increase in the next few months, it will probably be safe to assume the companies are more interested in salvaging European relationships than possibly upsetting the NSA's Section 702 apple cart.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Jul 2017 @ 6:27am

    / "But the noisiest silence is emanating from the tech sector"/

    no, the American legal community of judges and lawyers are by far the most deliberately silent on this surveillance police state cancer

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 25 Jul 2017 @ 6:37am

    I would think they are implementing measures to evade the NSA quietly so they can use as leverage when other countries (think the EU) gets worked up on some leaks or any new info about the issue. I mean, Google has implemented encryption on the streams among their servers for instance. I believe we will be seeing more of this sooner or later.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Jul 2017 @ 8:22am

    If the European Union decides the United States isn't taking foreigners' privacy seriously, it may act

    We know they're not—they're not even taking domestic privacy seriously, but every time they lie and say they're not surveilling Americans, they neglect to mention foreigners. Unless the EU is just being very slow, they're acting based on politics rather than facts.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 25 Jul 2017 @ 9:12am

    Signal to Noise Ratio

    The level of signal to deal with this (and any) issue is much lower than the level of tweets, er, I mean noise, or maybe I mean tweets, from the president.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    renegadegrammarian, 25 Jul 2017 @ 12:08pm

    Thank you, Mr. Cushing, for resisting the temptation to stick a hyphen in the word "runup."  It is a legitimate compound noun.  But so is applecart (@ end of article).

    First commenter nailed it.  Tapping into the backbone is a cancer & a very bad habit that the IC has been cultivating for years.  Now it looks (to me) like CIA has leaked certain Jeff Sessions conversations intercepted from the fatpipe.  Mr. Sessions is an ass who wants to revive the drug war & needs to be got rid of.  But when will the leaks from the fatpipe end?  Never.  & 702 will be irrevocably installed (a "clean reauthorization" LOL.  It's a dirty reauthorization‑‑-make no mistake).

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Jul 2017 @ 4:29pm

    Any sufficiently advanced business model is indistinguisable from organized crime

    , with substantial kickbacks going to politicians.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Rekrul, 25 Jul 2017 @ 11:56pm

    "Things have been mostly quiet as Congress heads towards the absolutely certain renewal of Section 702 surveillance powers."


    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Hanif Rana, 26 Jul 2017 @ 1:21pm



    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.