National Security Work Leaves Plenty Of Time For Games, Outside Employment, And Sexual Misconduct

from the BE-YOUR-OWN-BOSS-WORK-ONLY-4-HR-SHIFTS-ETC! dept

FOIA terrorist Jason Leopold has scored another win, securing a copy of an Intelligence Community Inspector General's investigation from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It's the sort of thing that's rarely released, most likely because it comes from the inner sanctum's inner sanctum. Maybe this one just seemed too damning to keep secret -- not for the ODNI or the Intelligence Community, but for the unnamed (well... redacted) ODNI employee who was caught abusing all sorts of policies, procedures, and laws while on the clock.

The investigation report [PDF] opens with a list of five violations affecting all areas of the employee's work. And also possibly some violations of other employees.

Subject engaged in conflicts of interest

Subject engaged in improper or unauthorized outside employment

Subject engaged in falsification and misrepresentation

Subject misused government information and information systems.

Subject engaged in sexual misconduct while on duty

So, a very busy employee, albeit one not actually doing much to fulfill the job description. When she wasn't working for the government (which was apparently most of her shift), she was working for up to 14 other companies. The report says the employee "averaged in excess of five hours per day on personal affairs and unofficial business."

What she was supposed to be doing was managing secured databases/sites and providing budget planning. What she actually did was handle work for outside companies while collecting a paycheck from taxpayers. This included companies currently being used by the IC as contractors and those seeking to win government contracts -- contradicting the information she gave supervisors and presented in disclosure forms. Even with this additional, conflicting workload, she still found plenty of time to do nothing.

A counterintelligence analyst remarked of [redacted] in an assessment of the audits from May 2010 to May 2013, "I have highlighted the subject's game playing, and noted the trends. Subject appears to use specific gaming sites for a set period of time and then switches to a new site ... There do not appear to be any major gaps in time where subject was not visiting some type of gaming site."

Working for fifteen employers is far less of a strain than I have been led to believe

When confronted with the issue of illegal executables, games, and inappropriate chats on her account during the interview, [redacted] admitted that she spends approximately "all day" on Facebook and plays games at work from four to six hours per day. She also admitted that she engaged in sexually explicit Sametimes with a contractor for the first year of her employment with ODNI.

The bar has been raised for wasting time at work. Between the games and providing some sort of assistance to fourteen outside companies (and engaging in sexual misconduct), the employee also found time to repeatedly access government databases for personal reasons. One of her favorite Privacy Act violations targeted the IC's most famous/infamous former member.

Between June 10, 2013 and July 2, 2013, [redacted] ran JPAS [Joint Personnel Adjudication System] record searches for Edward Snowden 357 times under three of her accounts (Link Solutions, Augusta Westland, and Twin Soft Corporation) while at ODNI facilities during duty hours. According to the Defense Manpower Data Center's Manual on JPAS Account Management, one of the most common JPAS user violations is "querying the JPAS application for 'celebrity' records." This policy is explicitly forbidden in the manuals for JPAS. In the case of 357 unauthorized JPAS queries, [redacted] violated the Privacy Act.

[...]

Between June 10, 2013, and May 19, 2014, [redacted] ran JPAS record-searches for her own record 442 times under four accounts (Link Solutions, Augusta Westland, 99999 Consulting, and Wheeler Network Design). 324 of the 442 JPAS violations in this case were performed while at ODNI facilities during duty hours. According to the Defense Manpower Data Center's Manual on JPAS Account Management, one of the most common JPAS user violations is "querying the JPAS application for your own record." This policy is explicitly forbidden in the manuals for JPAS.

Unfortunately, the report doesn't say what happened to this employee. Some of the IG's conclusions are redacted while others only say the investigation confirmed abuse of systems or violated policies. Her outside compensation also drew the heat of the IRS, which stepped in to examine her tax returns -- which she filed on the clock using an IC computer. It's been confirmed Snowden's privacy was violated, but I would imagine the IC feels he won't be filing a lawsuit anytime soon. It's difficult to believe this person could still be working for the government, but it's far from impossible she's still collecting a taxpayer-funded paycheck somewhere. The wheels of bureaucracy grind slower than the wheels of justice and this combines a little of both.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2017 @ 4:23am

    All of this, and somehow it's Snowden who the ruling authorities seek to vilify because it makes them and their surveillance look bad.

    Can't imagine why. It's not as though they needed Snowden to tarnish their own image.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Berenerd (profile), 29 Jun 2017 @ 4:56am

    She is most likely now being groomed for a Congressional run in 2018

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Daydream, 29 Jun 2017 @ 4:57am

    She got paychecks from 15 companies to play flash games and have cybersex all day?

    My heroine.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      bob, 29 Jun 2017 @ 8:30am

      Re:

      I'd wager the paycheck from the outside companies was to be a consultant (lobbyist). It always helps to have an inside woman that can help grease the wheels of government.

      Definitely a fire-able offence.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2017 @ 12:45pm

        Re: Re:

        IF she was an "inside connection" for companies getting contracts then those contract awards need to be reviewed as well. This could get deep.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    stderric (profile), 29 Jun 2017 @ 4:57am

    In the case of 357 unauthorized JPAS queries, [redacted] violated the Privacy Act.

    The Privacy Act is only to be violated using authorized queries.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    AnonCow, 29 Jun 2017 @ 5:31am

    I'mm in love!

    Send me a chat when you get to work!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    TheOtherDude, 29 Jun 2017 @ 6:23am

    DoD employee

    If she was a DoD employee (not a contractor like Snowden for example) then she either has a disability or is a veteran (there is really no other way to be FTE at the DoD). I would like to know which one.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    wshuff (profile), 29 Jun 2017 @ 6:33am

    I'm really working hard to raise my level of incompetence so I can get a government job.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Jinxed (profile), 29 Jun 2017 @ 7:41am

    Unfortunately, the report doesn't say what happened to this employee. Nothing from her employer, but now that the IRS is involved, it's Al Capone time.

    I wonder if she has a vault.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Sok Puppette, 29 Jun 2017 @ 7:51am

    So the fuck what?

    You can find people goofing off like that anywhere. ANYWHERE. Public sector, private sector, intelligence, law enforcement, judicial branch, and hot dog stands. And, yes, they get away with it at about the same rate everywhere.

    I had a private sector job where I was paid 7 figures for two years to literally do nothing at all.

    So what is interesting about this personnel matter, other than your desire to demonize anybody who works for the government?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Sok Puppette, 29 Jun 2017 @ 7:52am

      Re: So the fuck what?

      Correction: it was 6 figures, not 7. But I literally did do nothing at all, not even come in to work.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2017 @ 8:42am

        Re: Re: So the fuck what?

        Sorry, and you're saying that like it's something to be proud of why...?

        It's one thing to take an occasional mental break at work to browse a non-work website and it's quite another to spend ALL DAY LONG every single day on non-work related activities taking home a paycheque you clearly didn't earn.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          btr1701 (profile), 29 Jun 2017 @ 11:40am

          Re: Re: Re: So the fuck what?

          > Sorry, and you're saying that like it's something to be
          > proud of why...?

          He didn't imply it was something to be proud of. He merely stated that such practices are common everywhere, both in and out of government.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        crashsuit, 29 Jun 2017 @ 9:24am

        Re: Re: So the fuck what?

        So... Are they hiring?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2017 @ 7:34pm

        Re: Re: So the fuck what?

        If you fudge off in a private company, it's the company's problem and loss of money.

        If you fudge off in a government position, it's the taxpayer's problem and loss of money. Not many taxpayers would be happy to know they paid this woman to do nothing.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2017 @ 8:05am

      Re: So the fuck what?

      So because you worked for a crappy employer who apparently didn't keep tabs on their employees means that workers stealing from the tax payers (with their pay check for not working) is not new worthy?

      Sorry, you should have been fired also. The fact that this is public sector makes it interesting.

      Most of us would be fired for 3 years of nothing. ("audits from May 2010 to May 2013")

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2017 @ 9:07am

      Re: So the fuck what?

      And your counterargument is "everybody else is doing it"? Really?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2017 @ 9:30am

    And yet people want to have our government run our healthcare?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Personanongrata, 29 Jun 2017 @ 11:16am

    Failing Upwards

    National Security Work Leaves Plenty Of Time For Games, Outside Employment, And Sexual Misconduct

    This malfeasance is not an outlier - it's the norm.

    Unfortunately, the report doesn't say what happened to this employee.

    Unfortunately for us (ie tax payer) this employee was probably promoted.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    btr1701 (profile), 29 Jun 2017 @ 11:37am

    Grinding Wheels

    > Unfortunately, the report doesn't say what happened to
    > this employee. The wheels of bureaucracy grind slower
    > than the wheels of justice.

    If experience is any guide, she's on administrative leave while those wheels are grinding.

    In normal-speak, that means she gets a 6-month to a year vacation on the backs of the taxpayer before losing her job.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.