FCC’s Gomez Calls For Review Of Paramount’s Dodgy Merger Financing

from the dodgy-global-autocratic-disinformation-alliance dept

Anna Gomez, the FCC’s lone Democratic Commissioner (because Republicans refuse to seat the second one) is calling for a rigorous review of Paramount and the Ellison family’s planned $111 billion merger with Warner Brothers. As Paramount recently revealed, 49.5 percent of the deal’s funding comes from Middle East and Chinese government-linked sources; just the sort of thing Republicans pretend to get mad about when engaged in stuff like, say, offloading TikTok to the POTUS’s rich friends.

The FCC doesn’t have much of a role in the giant media merger approval process because public license transfers aren’t involved. But it does (in a theoretical country that respects the law) have a role to play in enforcing Communications Act restrictions that restrict foreign entities from holding more than a 25% indirect equity or voting interest in a U.S. company that holds broadcast licenses

Carr and the Ellisons have spent months publicly insisting the law doesn’t matter because the countries won’t have a meaningful management and board presence. It doesn’t matter, it’s still technically illegal.

But Carr is eager to ignore the law because the merger is of benefit to a rich Republican looking to gift his nepobaby two major Hollywood studies and turn what’s left of corporate news media (both CNN and CBS News) into an even-friendlier safe space for rich Republicans and global autocrats.

While Gomez’ actual power here is negligible, her call for a meaningful review is a useful reminder of Trump-era Republican hypocrisy and the importance of functional media ownership regulation (which the U.S. hasn’t had in a very long time). From Gomez’ statement:

“The American public deserves to know who owns the airwaves that carry their news. I
am alarmed by what appears to be an effort to rubber stamp a financial structure that
places nearly half of one of America’s largest broadcast and media companies into the
hands of foreign governments with documented records of press suppression and a
troubling willingness to silence journalists.

There are serious, unresolved questions about how this foreign investment may jeopardize national security, and this Commission has a legal obligation to answer them before handing
wealthy friends of this Administration yet another Billionaire Buddy Bypass on a
transaction that strikes at the heart of American journalism.”

Again, recall how Chinese private ownership of a social media company doing business in the United States caused a four year embolism by FCC boss Brendan Carr and other Trump loyal Republicans. Here you have a billionaire right wing Trump friend ignoring the law and gobbling up whatever’s left of U.S. media with the help of several autocratic buddies and there’s curiously no problem.

It’s almost as if Trump Republicans don’t have any coherent ideology beyond propping up their own wealth and power. If only the United States had a diverse and healthy news media capable of explaining that.

With Gomez in the minority there’s virtually no chance of a meaningful FCC review. Still, it’s nice to see a Democrat at least get the messaging on this right. Dem media reform policies have historically ranged from highly performative to nonexistent in a country increasingly too corrupt to care about meaningful antitrust reform (recall how Democratic leadership abandoned popular media reformer Gigi Sohn’s appointment to the FCC after a baseless Republican and telecom/media sector smear campaign).

Ellison’s effort to dominate media, and the authoritarian threat more broadly, is so ham-fisted and dire it’s been hard for Democrats to ignore this one. Carr has unsurprisingly ignored other Democrat lawmakers’ call for meaningful inquiry.

A potential lawsuit by a coalition of state attorneys general remains the best path for blocking the deal, though their focus will obviously be on the inevitable mass layoffs, price hikes, and shittier overall service that arrive every single time giant media mergers (especially involving Warner Brothers) get rubber stamped by our pay-to-play federal government.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,
Companies: paramount, warner bros. discovery

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FCC’s Gomez Calls For Review Of Paramount’s Dodgy Merger Financing”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
10 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

David says:

Nothing illegal here:

A potential lawsuit by a coalition of state attorneys general remains the best path for blocking the deal, though their focus will obviously be on the inevitable mass layoffs, price hikes, and shittier overall service that arrive every single time giant media mergers (especially involving Warner Brothers) get rubber stamped by our pay-to-play federal government.

Mass layoffs, price hikes, and shittier overall service are legal as well as planned and expected consequences of a merger. That’s what the buzzwords “synergies” and “consolidation” are about.

There is lot of lying about that, but that is just for pulling the wool over the eyes of the hoi polloi, not the regulators.

The regulators only get a word when the results reach monopoly level, meaning we are talking about a single independent large player remaining in some market segment, with all competitive restraints gone.

Short of that, it is just capitalism/mercantilism at work. It is bad for the consumer, but the consumer is not helpless but can go elsewhere.

It is like democracy: as long as the voter can choose between the thieves uniformly picking their pockets, the results are formally their own fault. Choice is important for blame-shifting.

Cathay (profile) says:

Re: Oracle's predictable fate

It’ll be broken up for parts, I expect. The database business is worth buying, some of the “enterprise applications” likewise. The cloud business may be worth more in the hands of a company that isn’t trying to shake all the small change out of its customers’ pockets, but may have too many liabilities to be buyable.

Oracle Linux and the Oracle Solaris business will cease, and Java is already mostly in the hands of the community.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...