Self-Proclaimed 'Vigilante' Instrumental In First Prostitution Bust By Drone

from the extra-eyes-in-the-skies dept

Private drones are the new CCTV. As Cyrus Farivar words it for Ars Technica, the age of sousveillance is upon us.

An Oklahoma man has received the distinction of being the first "john" in the state to be criminally prosecuted and arrested after being caught in the act by a drone. Local police records show Douglas Blansett, 75, was arrested and released on Thursday. That's according to local anti-prostitution Oklahoma City-based activist and private investigator Brian Bates, who has run JohnTV.com for years, a collection of videos of suspected sex workers and their johns.

It was Bates' drone that earlier this year took video of what he believed was a man picking up a woman named Amanda Zolicoffer that he described as a "known prostitute." Both Blansett and Zolicoffer now face a misdemeanor charge of "engaging in an act of lewdness."
This shows what's possible with surveillance equipment d/b/a hobbyist technology. Not that Bates is your average hobbyist. Bates, as noted above, is both a prostitution-focused "activist" and a salesman -- albeit one that sells recordings of sex acts to news agencies or whoever else is willing to license the footage. So, much like law enforcement, Bates profits from criminalized acts of consenting behavior between adults.

Bates and his drone followed a vehicle after noticing the driver had picked up a prostitute. The drone was deployed because a third vehicle also trailed the "couple," presumably belonging to the prostitute's pimp. Bates understandably felt his camera wouldn't be welcomed by the pimp, so he deployed his drone and the rest is recorded history.


It should be noted, Bates -- like other purveyors of "reality" programming -- apparently felt reality just wasn't interesting enough. A decade ago, he was arrested for felony pandering (a charge normally reserved for pimps) and a misdemeanor count of "aiding in prostitution."
According to the below Oklahoma City Police Department report, Brian Bates, 34, orchestrated the public encounters so he could peddle the resulting videotape to media outlets (some of Bates's surveillance tapes are offered for sale on his web site).

[I]f a john was a "regular," Bates asked prostitutes to give "specific signals" so he would know not to bother rolling tape. Investigators also noted that, like any good auteur, Bates "gave direction to the prostitutes on how to complete the act with a high probability of success," as well as tips on how to spot an undercover cop.
It also should be noted the charges may have not been entirely legitimate. Maggie McNeill -- an actual activist and sex worker advocate -- noted that the arrest may have stemmed from a "long-running" feud between Bates and a local district attorney.

That being said, there's nothing stopping this sort of thing from happening in the future and it's likely it won't just be private drone owners involved. If the act occurs in public, there's no way to claim any sort of invasion of privacy, especially when tied to a criminal act. Plenty of police departments are utilizing their own drones for surveillance. From a cost effectiveness perspective, flying drones to net misdemeanor charges doesn't make much sense. But all it takes is a little political pressure to trigger a reassessment of priorities.

Bates claims he's only targeting the "worst" kind of prostitution and makes a small nod towards privacy. But it's a meaningless gesture.
Bates said he focuses his efforts on “street, forced and organized prostitution,” not people who willfully engage in the profession behind closed doors.

“I'm only dealing with people who are literally out there out of desperation,” he said. “Either because a pimp's making them do it or because an addiction is making them do it. Nobody's making the john do it.”
More honestly, he's taking the secure legal route -- acts captured in public areas. If Bates could put a camera behind closed doors with minimal legal liability, I'm sure he would. So, his white knighting is borne of legal conveniences, not some genuine concern for supposedly-victimized prostitutes. (See also: the details of his arrest for pandering, which alleged Bates worked with prostitutes to ensure only the best -- and most sellable -- footage was captured.)

Whether or not you agree with Bates' "vigilantism," the implications are clear: public areas are open to "surveillance" by everyone, not just law enforcement. Private drones can easily act as souped-up Neighborhood Watch programs. As the barrier to entry continues to drop, we can expect more recordings from our friends and neighbors to fill in the "gaps" in law enforcement "coverage."

Filed Under: brian bates, bust, drones, johntv, law enforcement, prostitution


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 11 Dec 2015 @ 6:43pm

    Master Bates.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Stephen (profile), 11 Dec 2015 @ 7:00pm

    FAA fine

    He is using the drone for commercial purposes. Where is the FAA fine?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 15 Dec 2015 @ 3:38am

      Re: FAA fine

      give each cop a drone cam and a small percentage from the fees
      and they can happily work from home
      eating donuts on their sofa

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Glenn, 11 Dec 2015 @ 7:10pm

    So, his "worst kind": the ones who won't give him a freebie?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 11 Dec 2015 @ 9:22pm

    When Ars Technica ran an article on this, Mr Bates responded to many comments defending his actions. I personally can't understand why he isn't being sued for the revenge porn aspects of his vigilante actions.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      DanA, 12 Dec 2015 @ 4:10pm

      Re:

      My suspicion is that legally what he is doing wouldn't fall under most revenge porn laws in the US* because the images he takes are in public locations and thus would not be considered 'intimate private photos'. Much like when Lenny Kravitz had his 'wardrobe malfunction' and pics of his dangly bits were everywhere the fact that the photo was taken in public and there was no agreement between the parties to keep them private would generally avoid any possibility of conviction (prosecution of course only requires that you make a prosecutor upset). However none of that matters because Oklahoma hasn't made any effort to join the 21st century yet and has neither passed nor made an effort to pass a revenge porn so even if he were violating another states law it would be a hard push to find a john from another state that might give another states court potential jurisdiction unless they tried the old 'it is on the internet, we have the internet in our state, therefore we have jurisdiction' play.

      *This would definitely be illegal under Arizona's revenge porn law but since that is unconstitutional in the first place it is something of a moot point.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Roger Strong (profile), 11 Dec 2015 @ 9:39pm

    > An Oklahoma man has received the distinction of being the first "john" in the state...

    I call discrimination. If he were a Washington, DC man you'd be calling him a "top lobbyist."

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 11 Dec 2015 @ 10:43pm

    Clearly the lady was paid to do a sex act on camera, Douglas knew all along and was hoping to make his break into the porn industry.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    OGquaker (profile), 12 Dec 2015 @ 12:00am

    The 'property owner' is known and 'gave permission', his tires are the only crime happening in the video.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    TKnarr (profile), 12 Dec 2015 @ 12:54am

    I'm waiting for a box that'll a) scan for drone control signals or the signal of the video feed back to the controller, and b) use a directional antenna to send a higher-powered signal to the drone commanding it to go into a max-power vertical descent.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2015 @ 1:49am

    Mr Bates is not a vigilante, but rather a voyeur and pornographer.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2015 @ 3:50am

    This prostitution spycam-by-drone story was plastered all over the net a week ago, so I almost ignored this piece.

    But it's nice to finally see an investigative backstory of the kind that is so often missing from corporate 'mainstream' media.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2015 @ 4:14am

    75 years old and soliciting a prostitute? Good for him!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2015 @ 6:06am

    > criminally prosecuted and arrested after being caught in the act

    Good to see it described in the order it really happened...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Francostars, 12 Dec 2015 @ 6:36am

    Discrimination

    This one is a real social discrimination. Prostitution among adult and consentient people is a sex right way choice and it must be respected even in public places. Moreover, it is better to legalize and tax prostitution to cope with the crisis as soon as possible.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      DanA, 12 Dec 2015 @ 4:43pm

      Re: Discrimination

      I generally support the idea of legalizing prostitution but I don't think that sex in public places something that we must respect or even tolerate. Engaging sex publicly has a reasonable likelihood of forcing someone who has not consented to be involved with your sexual activity which is unacceptable.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2015 @ 5:20pm

        Re: Re: Discrimination

        I live in a country with legalised prostitution. There are far less streetwalkers since legalisation, and more, and smaller brothels. Some local councils have had to enact bylaws to ban suburban brothels that got too successful. There will always be an appetite for the 'drive and fuck' market though, so there will always be some streetwalkers.


        " Engaging sex publicly has a reasonable likelihood of forcing someone who has not consented to be involved with your sexual activity which is unacceptable".

        What do you mean? If you get too close to the fornicators they'll drag you down and screw you too?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          DanA, 12 Dec 2015 @ 9:23pm

          Re: Re: Re: Discrimination

          If I walk past the alley or car you are having public sex in, I have been involuntarily involved in your sexual activity. If you want voyeurs and they've consented to that then bully for you but I don't want that and I definitely don't want my son being exposed to that. The state does not have a valid interest in what people do sexually in the privacy of their own homes but the key word there is privacy.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 14 Dec 2015 @ 10:04am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Discrimination

            If I walk past the alley or car you are having public sex in, I have been involuntarily involved in your sexual activity.
            And if you walk past a discussion I'm having, you might be "involuntarily involved in" a political debate. Why should sexual things be treated differently? The idea that it's harmful for children to see such things is a mass cultural delusion, unsupported by evidence.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          BW (profile), 13 Dec 2015 @ 10:49am

          LOVE your comment!

          What do you mean? If you get too close to the fornicators they'll drag you down and screw you too?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DB (profile), 12 Dec 2015 @ 1:26pm

    You can have an expectation of privacy, even on public property.

    As a trivial example, camping in a national park. Or using the restroom at a playground.

    Something that is quite close to this situation is changing into a swimsuit while in your car near a beach. You can't expect privacy if you change out in the open, but you can if you aren't visible from any normal viewing angle. Just like high-mounted windows on a park restroom aren't an invitation for perv pictures, not every window is an invitation to take drone video.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2015 @ 6:22pm

    I imagine everybody here can see who the real pervert is. Just because there is snow on the roof doesn't mean there isn't a fire in the furnace. Time to put up curtains in your car, or better yet, get a room.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Dec 2015 @ 10:57pm

    Authoritarianism

    All good authoritarian states rely on the cooperation of the willing in keeping order. Sometimes motivated by fear, sometimes for fervor, they live by feeling needed.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Dec 2015 @ 7:32am

    Brian Bates is fucking slime. You can look at the guy and see he's the sort of person the world would be better without.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Christophe Von Moltke, 22 May 2016 @ 4:15am

    The man who enriches himself off of other people problems

    No One hire this piece of garbage Bill Bates to tail their spouse who expose prostitution.He does it to enrich himself and get a deal with you tube.This man is a real piece of garbage who makes money off of other people problems and misery,in what is a victimless crime.Bates is the lowest form of human life and is the 3rd annual winner of the loser of the year..2016.CONGRATS Misses Bates

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.