Australian Broadcasters, Netflix Competitors Pout Because Netflix Hasn't Banned VPN Users Yet

from the give-the-people-what-they-want dept

Australia has a long and proud history of seeing higher copyright infringement rates, thanks in large part to the country's failure to offer up legitimate, affordable streaming video options. With Netflix officially unavailable Down Under, many viewers there have taken things into their own hands and have started using VPNs to mask their location and subscribe to the service anyway. Cue the rising hysteria from both broadcasters and Australian Netflix competitors, who insist that something has to be done about this flagrant outrage. They're helped by regional paper The Australian, which suggests that these paying users are "pirates":
"Highlighting how the TV networks view these people, an article this morning in News Corp-owned The Australian went as far as labeling subscribers as “pirates”, even though they are paying for the service..."There is concern at local networks about the growing impact of the US company flouting international regulations by accepting payments from Australian credit cards, despite maintaining a geo-block that is easily bypassed by VPN manipulation or spoof IP addresses,” the paper said."
Granted, if companies were delivering what users wanted, this wouldn't even be an issue. In fact, that would seem to be a much easier solution to this "problem." Instead, broadcasters and Australian streaming provider Quickflix (HBO is an 8% owner) seem to think it would make more sense to force Netflix to ban the use of a very common technology that has innumerable uses well outside of just skirting regional limitations. Some users, for example, are finding that VPNs are one (albeit sometimes inefficient) way to bypass some of the annoying new peering feuds erupting here in the States. Still, Quickfix thinks somebody really should force Netflix to start blocking VPNs before the country starts falling apart:
"Quickflix chief executive Stephen Langsford has accused US online streaming service Netflix of turning a blind eye to copyright infringement in order to get a free ride in Australia, as competition heats up in the TV and movie streaming market..."The studios have licensed Netflix to distribute content on particular terms in the US and other larger markets, they haven’t licensed Netflix for Australia. I have no doubt that the studios are in discussions with Netflix about VPNs because it is blatantly in breach of terms and Netflix is essentially getting a free ride into Australia."
It seems like only a matter of time before proxies and VPNs see a renewed focus as public enemy number one by the entertainment industry. Most of the world's graduated response programs, including ours here in the States, can't detect users who are using proxies and VPNs at all. With Australia now contemplating a graduated response program of their own, you can expect the vilification of VPNs to ramp up quickly, even though any laws restricting their use would be met with swift and steep opposition.

Netflix hasn't stated why they've yet to head to Australia yet, but it's either because they want to prioritize larger international markets, or they're having a hard time securing content licensing from Australian broadcasters. Until Netflix does show up Down Under, Australian cable operators like Foxtel are engaged in the kind of brilliant anti-piracy maneuvers we've grown used to, such as locking down HBO's Game of Thrones in an exclusive streaming and download arrangement. Surely that will stop copyright infringement of what's become the most pirated show on the Internet, right?

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Mar 3rd, 2014 @ 5:18pm

    Somewhat similar situation happened to me. I was a paying subscriber to Crunchyroll, but I used a VPN to access their US catalogue, rather than the local one. One time, I went onto a popular Irish forum and asked questions about which VPN is best for streaming, since I was having problems with mine. The forum mods took down my post, saying that even though I had pointed out I was paying for CR, I was still committing some sort of "crime" by mentioning violating geo-restrictions.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 7:20am

    What we need is some sort of "Free" Trade agreement ....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    edpo, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 7:21am

    VPN's

    Anyone attempting to criticize VPN's in this day and age is clueless. I am on a VPN all day, for my privacy *and* because that is how my business is set up to work. I can be anywhere in the world and be sitting at my desk, working as I normally do and being productive. My personal interests (privacy and productivity) trump what some technophobe entertainment-industry lawyer thinks I should be doing to maximize his employer's revenue. It's absurd. If I were advocating for changes in *his* industry to help maximize my income at the expense of his employer's interests, the absurdity would be even more obvious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 7:27am

    This just further highlights the Media/MAFIAA wanting to control the internet. It's no longer a case that there are people with money willing to pay to use the service but now more of a case of the Media/MAFIIA wanting the people to use the service when they say so on their terms because they feel that by restricting the service then it will generate more profit for them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 7:38am

    It is not copyright infringement to buy content from another country!

    They're just giving me another reason to become a pirate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Anonymous Howard (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 7:46am

    Geo-restrictions on the internet

    The main problem is crap like this.

    There is no (should be no) "US internet" or "Australian internet", the internet is a... well, *GASP* international net.

    It, and it's infrastructure, maintenance and overseer organizations should be sovereign entities protected by the UN, NATO, whatever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Easily Amused (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:01am

    Aus bandwidth

    Part of the reason Netflix isn't servicing the Aus/NZ region is the re-goddamn-diculous charges for bulk bandwidth the ISP's charge. Datacenter level peering connections cost 5x-10x what they cost in all other regions. If Netflix expands to this area officially, they would have to set up local infrastructure to support the massive amount of traffic it would generate, because the existing network links to Oceania are horrible with latency and packet loss a majority of the time, and downed links will sometimes stay down for weeks.

    Given how much media Netflix would be exposing to Aussies for the first time, and the lack of any serious competitors, the market penetration for an official launch there would be huge. Adding something like 30%+ of additional traffic to US-based servers for streaming would rapidly bring the Oceanic ISP's to their knees.

    I couldn't even place a guesstimate number on what Netflix would have to pay to offer any kind of reasonable quality of service in that environment, not even counting the new licensing deals for regional content that would have to be sorted out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:03am

    Re:

    No your bitch ass just needs to pay more because your county is richer... and cause we own your politicians!!!

    Regards,
    ~MPAA/RIAA/MafiAA

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    blaktron (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:12am

    Why in the world would Netflix buckle to this. They get extra revenue without having to even compete in the region, costs them nothing and banning VPNs would be extremely difficult and privacy destroying for their paying customers. All for a country they don't have a presence in. Yeah, gonna happen for sure....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Pragmatic, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:17am

    Re:

    Voted funny.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    Derek (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:18am

    Re: Aus bandwidth

    I believe Netflix still uses the Amazon data center. They could easily copy their stuff to a data center down-under and all the cross-pacific bandwidth issues go away. The content is fairly static (written only once) so making a copy in Australia isn't the problem.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    DB (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:20am

    I see this as the same situation as importing low-cost textbooks licensed for foreign markets.

    Large companies want the benefits of an open world economy, moving production freely to optimize costs. But they don't want their customers to have the have same freedom to buy where the prices are lower, or the selection is better.

    In this case the media companies want to buy their content on the worldwide market, while restricting their customers from doing the same. They want the government to effectively grant them a distribution monopoly.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    edpo, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:24am

    Re:

    "Large companies want the benefits of an open world economy, moving production freely to optimize costs. But they don't want their customers to have the have same freedom to buy where the prices are lower, or the selection is better."
    _______________________

    Well said. That's what it comes down to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:25am

    And there we have it. The word pirate has lost all meaning. Congratulations Australia.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:33am

    Re:

    Yeah, I had an argument with some idiot a while back on Reddit or similar. He, of course, started by totally jumping at the wrong type of argument (arguing that people who paid for VPN access were pirates wanting things for free - he kept at that argument for a while even after I pointed out that anyone doing so was paying *more* than anyone else since they had the VPN fee on top of the usual subscription fee. Sigh...).

    Once things settled down, he literally couldn't come up with a reason why accessing a US Netflix account was any different to importing NTSC VHS tapes, region 1 DVDs or region A Blus. Apart from vague notion of "entitlement", nobody seems to come up with any argument other than "if the studios don't want you to buy it, don't buy it", which sits rather uncomfortably with the "we're losing money because people don't buy our stuff" arguments. Actively spending money to prevent people from paying for content they otherwise cannot legally access does seem rather counter-productive.

    But hey, now that the argument seems to be switching from people only getting things for free to people not spending their money in the right location, there seems to be some progress. Sadly, as ever, the answer is "fix your outdated business model that depends on market factors that no longer exist" - something that seems to take a decade to get across among all the lies.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    vastrightwing, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:14am

    Sledge hammer

    Yes, here we go: it's not enough that we take the web away and make it a trunk based system. Next we're creating geo location databases so we can limit information flow based on location information. But since people can circumvent that little problem, we now have to figure out how to determine if a user is using a proxy server or VPN? So we're bent on the idea of taking a sledge hammer and systematically destroying the information super highway and turning it into a muddy dirt road?

    Ok, the internet was not invented to make your business models make money for you. No it was designed to allow people to communicate. There was no thought about security, DRM, geo location, profits for record companies or film distribution. It was about allowing people to communicate with each other. And since it wasn't designed to do what you want it to do, you want to destroy it! Is this correct?

    Why can't you guys create your own network called the entertainment network cable and charge people tons of money to access your network. I'm sure everyone will subscribe. Make it so consumers have no control over the content. Don't allow consumers to record or time shift or place shift. Make sure to raise rates every 6 months and block programming every time there is a dispute over money. Now that will be popular. But stay the f--- away from our network!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:23am

    Ah yes "The Australian" newspaper doing a total hack piece on how Foxtel is good, and why monopolies are needed within Australia..


    Interesting point... Guess which paper News Limited (majority owner of Foxtel) and e Aussie Rupert Murdoch owns..

    go on guess.. I'll give you a hint.. it's in italics above!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:30am

    News limited enjoy a monopoly on pay tv in Australia.
    The cheapest package is $49/month and the most expensive being $124. For the price you pay the content is not great and riddled with advertising. Quickflix, netflix's competitor in Australia is mostly a postal dvd service and has very little streaming content. They charge $9.99/month for a streaming only plan *but* You also have to pay extra for the latest content. For example Walking dead season 4 $42.99. high speed internet for homes is vehemently opposed my media corporations and liberal government reps due to the threat to the profit margins they pose.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    RyanNerd (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:31am

    Pirates!

    Penal Colony of Pirates I say!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    mattshow (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:37am

    It's cliche now to say that big content producers (movie studios, TV networks etc.) need to adapt to the new realities that the Internet has forced up on them. There are, occasionally, situations in which I don't think that general principle is apt and in which I feel a bit of sympathy for the content producers.

    But if there is one thing that content producers need to accept as something that is completely true and completely out of their control, it's this: geographical restrictions of any kind are dead. People don't just talk about TV shows and movies around the water cooler in their offce anymore. The true fans, the superfans, the fans who will buy all your DVD box sets and t-shirts and posters and will go to the conventions, the fans that, as a content producer, you desperately want to attract, are online talking to other superfans in other countries. And if you think the superfans in Australia are going to wait six months to watch the episode that all their American friends online watched last night and are talking about, you're badly mistaken. If you don't make it available to them through legal channels, they will find other ways to get it.

    And they don't care what the reasons for the delay are. They don't care that back in the 90s, you signed exclusive distribution deals with some Australian TV networks because that made sense at the time and those TV networks haven't got around to making the material available yet. They don't care that you have a marketing plan that depends on staggered releases. They don't care what your excuse is. All they know is that there is something out there that they want to watch, they're willing to pay you to watch it, and you're not giving them that option. So they're going to take the other option.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:21pm

    Re: Re:

    Unfortunately fixing their business model means lots of middlemen lose their job. That's why they won't change.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:24pm

    Re: Sledge hammer

    It's not that they want to destroy the internet - it's that they have the power to do it.

    These people just produce entertainment yet they have the power to dictate to governments and write laws.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:24pm

    If it's hurting their business, then what's the problem? They SHOULD be banned.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    That One Guy (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:35pm

    Re:

    1) It's not hurting Netflix's business, quite the opposite in fact, as VPN's are allowing customers they otherwise would not have to sign up and pay them.

    2) Why should anyone but the studios feel the need to help the studios? Netflix isn't an employee of the ones complaining(no matter how much the one's whining think or claim otherwise), why should they screw over their own customers just to appease those too stupid to make available what people are clearly willing to pay for if it's made available to them?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:38pm

    Re:

    Using a VPN for this purpose does not violate any current laws in the U.S., though earlier drafts of ACTA would have made it illegal, had any of those ACTA versions ever been adopted.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:43pm

    It would be easy for Netflix to detect proxy and VPN usage. There are software programs that keep lists of all known IP addresses of proxies, VPNs, and anonimity services. Programs like Blocked.com (formerly blockscript), are very good at this.

    I know this because I had to install a program on my website a few years ago to keep out one persistent and troublesome user who would not get the message that he was not welcome on my web site.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    icon
    That One Guy (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:46pm

    Potential customers to studios: We really like the shows you put out, and we'd love to give you money so we could watch them in an easy, legal fashion, and not have to rely on torrents and downloading in order to watch them.

    Studios: We don't want your money, you filthy pirates!

    -Later-

    Studios to politicians/'employees': Despite all we've done, all the laws we've bought, people still refuse to pay us the exorbitant prices we demand. Not only that, in the places where we don't offer our product for sale at all, we're losing literally billions of dollars each year due to people pirating our products.

    Politician: I thought you said you aren't offering the products for sale in those areas, how can you lose money from piracy when you were never going to make a sale in the first place due to your decision not sell there?

    Studio rep: Here's a five grand 'campaign contribution', now what were you saying?

    Politician: Like I was saying, obviously those filthy pirates are costing you billions each year, which can only be stopped by more and harsher laws introduced here, and then crammed down the throats of the other countries.

    Studio rep: Better.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    That One Guy (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:48pm

    Re:

    So they could, but the question remains 'Why would they want to?' Doing something that would screw over and drive off and entire country's worth of viewers/subscribers doesn't exactly seem like a smart move to me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    Easily Amused (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 1:45pm

    Re: Re: Aus bandwidth

    it's not cross-pacific data that is the problem, it is the cost of the local Aus data warehousing and local bandwidth needed, on top of the costs of regional programming. Just renting Colo space in an Aus DC for game servers, etc is crazy expensive, obtaining rackspace and local peering bandwidth for Netflix-ish data volumes would be monumentally expensive.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Kronomex, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 2:50pm

    Of course Rupert is complaining bitterly about naughty Australians using VPN's (which reminds me to keep looking for a good VPN) to watch overseas product, it means his literal stranglehold on cable here is being, gasp, shock, horror, threatened. I fully expect Rupert will lobby his puppets-in-power to ban VPN's because they are anti-competative. Rupert would like to see free to air, the ABC and SBS destroyed, Rupert doesn't like the word "free" because it means he doesn't control it. I'm looking forward to when Rupert carks it because then the fun will start as News Corp, hopefully, self destructs.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 2:53pm

    Re: Re: Re: Aus bandwidth

    Luckily they would make monumental amounts of money to pay for it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 3:06pm

    ACA

    Funny thing is, during the hearings on Apple / Adobe / M$ price gouging, the Australian Consumer Association not only recommended VPNs, they told people how to get them. This is one that will go nowhere.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    charliebrown (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 3:10pm

    Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

    Otherwise known as the ACCC, has said, in regards to Australians being forced to pay unreasonably higher prices for software, including songs of iTunes, that if Australians know how to work around a geo-block, they should!

    http://www.choice.com.au/reviews-and-tests/computers-and-online/networking-and-internet/shopp ing-online/navigating-online-geoblocks.aspx

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 3:21pm

    Re:

    In Australia many of the large Bricks & Mortar stores have been complaining that their previously ripped off customers have bypassed them and bought stuff via the internet. When they first went to the last Federal Government they complained that the exemption from paying GST (10%) on goods valued at less than $1000 was the reason for this snubbing of their B&M stores, however after a massive uproar from the public when they stated that they were saving up to 50% off their overseas purchases even if GST was added on, the B&M stores soon STFU.
    However now a new business friendly LNP Federal government is is control we have been warned that GST may well be added onto these

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 3:25pm

    Re:

    Australia would not be able to enforce a VPN ban outside of the country. A US-based VPN provider would not NOT SUBJECT to Australian laws. Until the US eventually made them illegal, the Australian government would not be able to enforce a VPN ban on a US provider.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 3:35pm

    Re:

    Rupert's mum lived to 97yo so sadly it's a long wait for the parties to start yet, as Rupert is only 82yo. He's already outlived his father who passed away at 67yo.
    If the world thought that the Thatcher parties were big, just wait until this old fossil goes!
    Funnily enough Rupert hates the publicly funded BBC yet bought up the Australian broadcast rights to most of their shows, but then he only did that to stop the local publicly funded ABC to broadcast them after a 50? year run.
    He so reminds me of greedy Daffy Duck, - it's mine, mine, mine, all mine.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    icon
    Eldakka (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 4:07pm

    Re: Geo-restrictions on the internet

    the internet is a... well, *GASP* international net.


    Incorrect. The Internet is a series of interconnected networks. A network of networks. It is not one gigantic network. It is made up of national (and other) networks that are themselves made up of thousands, millions of separate networks that all interconnect. Each ISP is its own, separate network that interconnects with other networks (this is where peering comes in, see the recent stories about netflix peering problems).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 4:16pm

    Re: Re:

    It's not about Netflix. There are services in place for Australia and people are using illegal means to access other ones. VPNs should be banned as they is no legitimate reason for them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 4:52pm

    Re: Re: Geo-restrictions on the internet

    Way to miss the point Poindexter

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 4:54pm

    Re: VPN's

    "If I were advocating for changes in *his* industry to help maximize my income at the expense of his employer's interests"

    Then you would be a terrorist

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 5:17pm

    Re: Re:

    You never know. When people get to that age, the two most likely things to kill him will be either pneumonia or a "silent" heart attack.

    As far as "parties" go, wait until the day Dianne Feinstein goes. I have the Fifth Element cover of "Ding Dong the Witch is dead", ready to play on my online radio station when that happens. When Feinstein goes, the parties will be bigger than those of Murdoch or Thatcher will be.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 5:22pm

    Re: Re:

    Well, this new market in software is just getting started now, and Blockscript/Blocked.com has the most affordable solution, starting at $495, plus $20 each for any other domains you want to license, and no annual subscription after that. That is why I use it to keep that one troublesome user out of my web site. It is affordable, and it works.

    If Netflix chooses to block proxies, VPNs, and the like, I think that is the way they will do it. All you need is a Windows Server, and Apache web server software, and PHP, and you are good to go.

    Netflix would have to switch to Windows servers, since the setup is designed to run on Windows servers, and not Linux or Unix, as Apache is a Windows product.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 5:27pm

    One thing about outlawing VPNs in the US could be a constitutional question, which is one of the unintended effects of the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973.

    When the court legalised abortion, they bascially said that that there is a constitutional right to privacy, and that applies to just about anything.

    So Roe v. Wade would likely have the unintended effect of making any law against proxies, VPNs, or other privacy tools, unconstitutional.

    Of course the IP chapters of TPP, ACTA, TAFTA, and the like are all designed to override the constitution, which is why we will likely see VPNs and other privacy tools outlawed after TPP comes into force.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 5:53pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Except online banking, secure remote access, and a thousand other things.

    Go on, list those services in Australia. See how purely we are catered to. See how much extra it costs us to receive a fraction of the service.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 6:33pm

    they havenít licensed Netflix for Australia


    Nor do they need to, technically we (I'm in Australia) have parallel import laws with the US, meaning we are within our rights to get content from the states instead of local prividers. If anything the geo-blocking should be illegal as it prevents "parallel import".

    Our top consumer group actually recomended the use of VPN to get around this sort of geo-blocking. This is all just a case of some-one not wanting to compete, so demanding that the competition be removed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    icon
    That One Guy (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 8:59pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Informative, though it rather misses the second point I raised, that of 'Why should they?'

    It wouldn't matter if it cost them nothing at all to block all VPN users from their service, the point remains, doing so is stopping people who want to pay them from doing so, and intentionally driving away customers and potential customers is never a smart business plan.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 11:11pm

    I have no doubt that the studios are in discussions with Netflix about VPNs because it is blatantly in breach of terms and Netflix is essentially getting a free ride into Australia.

    So somehow a CEO from a _competing_ company gets to set the terms for how Netflix is _allowed_ to serve the Australian market? Entitlement much?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Mar 5th, 2014 @ 1:39am

    Re: Re: Re:

    "VPNs should be banned as they is no legitimate reason for them."

    If you ever wonder why people think you're a clueless moron with no concept of the facts you're trying to argue - here it is. Go away, do 5 minutes of research into what VPNs are and how they're used in business, then try to deal with facts. I know real facts are more difficult than the AC fantasies, but there it is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    icon
    Anonymous Howard (profile), Mar 5th, 2014 @ 2:16am

    Re: Re: Geo-restrictions on the internet

    So you say you have to have the digital equivalent of passport and visa to access the "USA internet" from a far away location?

    The infrastructure of the internet is (of course) owned by different countries, but the core design of the internet don't support separation by countries the way you suppose.

    You don't normally know or have control over the route of the packets you send and receive, it can cross multiple countries on it's way without affected by the fact (apart from apparently certain countries like to sniff everything...). It's not like you travel by car from Germany to Russia.

    If you want your network to be part of the internet, you must have to adhere to certain rules, and these rules and organizations should be independent from any country.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Mar 5th, 2014 @ 8:32am

    Re: Re: Sledge hammer

    I think they do want to destroy the internet. Not the infrastructure of the internet -- that, they want to cannibalize and turn it into a locked-down content delivery system.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Mar 5th, 2014 @ 8:35am

    Re: Re: Re:

    "VPNs should be banned as they is no legitimate reason for them."

    That's hilarious in it's wrongness. In addition to the uses the other commenters have cited, I use my workplace VPN every single day. They require it to help keep their intranet secure.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Mar 5th, 2014 @ 8:38am

    Re: Re: Re:

    "Apache is a Windows product."


    Errr, no, it's not. Apache is the most popular web server in the nonwindows world. It is multiplatform, but originated in the Unices, not Windows.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 5th, 2014 @ 6:49pm

    If think if anyone really pushes for VPNs to be banned, it will be the cell phone companies. Some providers block "tethering" in the phone, by blocking port 80, but than can be circumvented with a VPN.

    When I had to move last year due to bed bugs, and did not have internet right way, I used my VPN subscription to bypass their tethering block that is in the phone, rather than at the network level.

    The only problem with that was that I could not use my Netflix subscription, since none of the VPN providers I was using, had US-based servers. All this NSA spying business has some VPN providers spooked, to where they have pulled their U.S. servers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 5th, 2014 @ 9:05pm

    I could see Britain banning VPNs in the near term. This is because it is illegal, in Britain, for a foreigner to access their work Email while there as a tourist. Since one YouTube video points that out among their 25 illegal things most people do on the Net, it is very likely that foreign tourists will start using VPNs to hide it from the British government that they are accessing their work emails, while there on vacation, and I think that will prompt Britain to ban VPNs.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Mar 6th, 2014 @ 2:35am

    Re: Re: Re:

    "Apache is a Windows product."

    Are you stupid, or do you just like to lie?

    I can't think of any other reason why someone would claim this kind of totally idiotic, totally wrong "fact".

    For the clueless: Apache is a free, open source piece of software developed by the Apache Foundation, is totally cross-platform and is one of the most popular solutions for Linux and UNIX web servers. While it does also run on Windows, you'd have to be particularly ill-informed to think it was a Windows technology.

    Perhaps you're thinking of IIS, Microsoft's own web server technology. However, your utterly incorrect claim places doubt on anything else you say, especially since you claim to host web sites yourself. Perhaps you should educate yourself before claiming to know more than others.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Mar 6th, 2014 @ 2:38am

    Re:

    "This is because it is illegal, in Britain, for a foreigner to access their work Email while there as a tourist."

    I'd like a citation for this claim.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    identicon
    Shaun Stevin, Mar 6th, 2014 @ 5:09am

    I am using PureVPN to watch Netflix from the Australia. The USA Server is the fastest. I tried, streaming video on Netflix works great with it.
    http://www.purevpn.com/vpn-service/vpn_for_mmorpg.php

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    identicon
    Shaun Stevin, Mar 6th, 2014 @ 5:12am

    I am using PureVPN to watch Netflix from the Australia. The USA Server is the fastest. I tried, streaming video on Netflix works great with it.
    http://www.purevpn.com/vpn-service/vpn-for-hulu-netflix-online-streaming.php

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    icon
    Alana (profile), Mar 9th, 2014 @ 5:45pm

    Re: Aus bandwidth

    New Zealander here. Agreed. But. In a couple months the flat I'm in is switching to Fibre internet via Orcon which is gonna offer up to 100 Megabits per second depending on location. It's also unlimited and not throttled.

    So I'm probably gonna get a VPN and Netflix.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 24th, 2014 @ 11:56pm

    Re:

    The right to privacy in Roe vs Wade was an obvious arse-pull, and not a very well-founded or consistently-accepted one. For example, try turning up at a hospital with a gunshot wound in most parts of the US and then getting treated without being reported to the police.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  61.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 25th, 2014 @ 12:03am

    Re: Re:

    I don't have one, but engaging in work while in the country on a tourist visa is probably banned even if the work is for a foreign company. However, it does seem surprising that an exemption hasn't been introduced for work which is substantially less than full-time and for which the worker's presence in the UK is irrelevant, or for business transactions of low value incidental to permitted work (i.e. paying for postage etc.). People taking work with them on holiday is not new, so someone must have spotted that omission by now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  62.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 29th, 2014 @ 10:08pm

    If Netflix decides to ban for VPN and DNS,they'll be out of many customers. Myself included,and more people will go back to downloading...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Advertisement
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Support Techdirt - Get Great Stuff!

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.