European Court Of Justice Finds Google Not Guilty Of Trademark Infringement In Ad Sales... But Leaves Lots Of Loopholes

from the will-they-give-up-yet? dept

Various big luxury brands have been trying for years to get courts to say that Google is somehow liable for trademark infringement if it sells ads based on people doing searches on trademarked keywords. Most courts have rejected this argument -- but there was one in France that accepted it and sided with LVMH (owners of brands Louis Vuitton, Moet & Hennessey, among others). That case moved up to the European Court of Justice, which had already suggested that selling ads based on trademarked keywords shouldn't be considered infringing. I had thought, upon reading the BBC's coverage of the final decision, that the court had strongly agreed with Google by saying that it was not guilty of trademark infringement, but it seemed odd that LVMH seemed to be claiming victory in the quote in that article, saying: "the ruling clarified the rules of online advertising."

Looking at other coverage of the ruling, it appears the BBC's explanation leaves out many of the important details. While it's true that the court found that Google was not guilty, it did say that Google needs to remove ads when companies complain and that national courts can set their own rules on this topic. It's not a complete win for either party, but it does seem to give more control to big brands to block perfectly legitimate advertising.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: advertising, counterfeits, trademarks


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Ima Fish (profile), 23 Mar 2010 @ 11:40am

    "Google needs to remove ads when companies complain"

    That's more than a loophole, it's basically an outright win for the brand owners who sued. And it's a complete perversion of what trademark is supposed to be about: consumer protection.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), 23 Mar 2010 @ 11:55am

      Re:

      Agreed. Is it a blanket action, like a DMCA takedown request? Or is there any oversight by any third party to determine whether or not the takedown request is frivilous?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Ima Fish (profile), 23 Mar 2010 @ 12:09pm

        Re: Re:

        It sounds blanket to me.

        Imagine if someone searches on Google for "Chevy Venture Honda Pilot comparison." Now what if the Chevrolet's adword advertisement was a comparison between the Venture and the Pilot. Would that have to be pulled too?

        Let's go beyond adwords. Let's assume that GM puts a video on YouTube comparing its cars to Honda. When you search for Honda that GM video/ad comes up first, should that also be removed if Honda complains?

        This is a huge blow to free speech and it makes it more difficult for consumers to find factual information they might need before purchasing.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    NAMELESS.ONE, 23 Mar 2010 @ 12:00pm

    im gonna just send 50000000 complaints fo all kinds

    and wonder how many businesses will suffer after paying for there ad.

    Capitalism is becoming bad ....very stupid and bad

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    sprearson81 (profile), 10 Jun 2012 @ 8:47am

    These suits are based on a very shaky understanding of how things work.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.