by Mike Masnick
Fri, Dec 11th 2009 5:52pm
One of my all-time favorite scenes in a play and movie, is the scene in Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead where every coin toss comes up heads, leading to a bit of a philosophical discussion on probability. Of course, the randomness of the coin toss is the quintessential example of a random event and is used regularly for a variety of situations in which randomness is required, let alone expected. Except... it turns out the common wisdom may be wrong. Paul Kedrosky has the news of a test that showed that if you ask people to try flip a coin and get more heads than tails, they will, and not by a small margin either. In the test, 13 people were asked to flip a coin 300 times, trying to get as many heads as possible. All 13 participants got more heads than tails. Seven out of the thirteen had statistically significant margins of heads over tails (meaning almost certainly not a matter of chance). The highest was one individual had 68% of the coin flips land heads. In other words, a coin toss isn't particularly random.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- New Report On Encryption Confirms There's More Of It, But Still Not Much Of A Problem For Law Enforcement
- 2012 Research Paper Linking Video Games And Violence Finally Retracted Over Massaged Data Accusation
- Do You Have Examples Of Constructive Responses To Hateful/Abusive/Trollish Speech Online?
- Reverse Engineering Lottery Scratch Tickets For Profit (But Not Fame)
- Faux Randomness Strikes Again: How Researchers Realized Research 2000's Daily Kos Data Looked Faked