by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 24th 2009 5:00am
We've pointed this out over and over and over and over and over again, but whenever a government puts together a big database of info on people -- the data gets abused. The latest example, found via Michael Scott is the news that a police chief in Iowa has been suspended after he supposedly revealed data that he never should have had in the first place, supposedly handing out information on someone's driving record and criminal history, despite having no legal reason to even have that info, let alone distribute it to anyone. So why do we keep assuming that governments won't abuse such data collections?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Government Accountability Offices Finds Government Still Mostly Terrible When It Comes To Cybersecurity
- Army Officials Withheld FOIA Documents To Push Out Its Spin On Head Injuries
- Government Report Declares Broadband An Essential, Uncompetitive Utility, Wistfully Ponders If Perhaps We Should Do Something About It
- Carl Malamud Asks YouTube To Institute Three Strikes Policy For Those Who Abuse Takedowns
- TPP Leaks Shows US Stands Firm That Companies Should Be Free To Abuse Patents & Copyrights