by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 24th 2009 5:00am
We've pointed this out over and over and over and over and over again, but whenever a government puts together a big database of info on people -- the data gets abused. The latest example, found via Michael Scott is the news that a police chief in Iowa has been suspended after he supposedly revealed data that he never should have had in the first place, supposedly handing out information on someone's driving record and criminal history, despite having no legal reason to even have that info, let alone distribute it to anyone. So why do we keep assuming that governments won't abuse such data collections?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Twitter Suspends Hundreds Of Thousands Of Terrorist Accounts, Gives Everyone Its 'Quality Filter'
- A Possible Solution To Twitter's Difficult Problem Of Abusive Behavior: Let People Speak, Don't Force Everyone To Listen
- Half Of TSA's 30,000 Employees Accused Of Misconduct; Nearly A Third Multiple Times
- Reports Shows UK Police Improperly Accessed Data On Citizens Thousands Of Times
- DEA Finally Decides To Do Something About Its Wiretap Warrant Abuses