Family Guy Song Didn't Infringe On Pinocchio Song

from the when-you-wish-upon-a-star... dept

It's another victory for fair use, as a judge has sided with the producers of the animated series Family Guy in a lawsuit over whether the song When You Wish Upon A Star was infringed by a parody song. The judge sided with Family Guy, noting that the song was used for humorous intent, and the "wholesome" association between the original and the movie Pinocchio made the song ripe for parody. This isn't the first time Family Guy has won lawsuits from people who are apparently unaware of the legal acceptance of parody... Somehow, it's unlikely to be the last time either.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: fair use, family guy


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Falindraun, 17 Mar 2009 @ 2:04am

    C'Mon Disney

    ::Rolls eyes and smacks Disney in the face::

    C'mon guys, don't be stupid.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Vidiot (profile), 17 Mar 2009 @ 4:53am

      Re: C'Mon Disney

      Actually, it doesn't belong to Disney, much to their chagrin. In terms of Disney-associated themes, it's "the one that got away"...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Doe (profile), 9 Oct 2009 @ 6:04am

        Re: Re: C'Mon Disney

        Actually, "Whe You Wish Upon a Star" IS owned by the Disney Corporation. THAT's why it's Disney trademarked anthem and opens each film made.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Mar 2009 @ 2:37am

    Satire is the best form of liable...err...i mean-Flattery ;)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Matt T., 17 Mar 2009 @ 4:31am

    Title?

    Aww, Mike, you didn't tell us the name of the song in question. For those who are wondering, it was "When you wish upon a Jew"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    andBeans, 17 Mar 2009 @ 4:51am

    Wasn't that song in one of the "banned" episodes anyway? Sheesh...is Disney hard-up for money, too?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Comboman, 17 Mar 2009 @ 5:02am

    Victory?

    Hardly a victory. All this means is that corporations with deep enough pockets to afford good lawyers (i.e. Fox) can utilize their fair use rights. The rest must either comply with cease-and-desist letters or lose their life savings fighting it in court.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Mar 2009 @ 5:16am

    Obvious

    They need some sort of obvious test for this type of crap. If it is obvious that Disney should not have filed, they should be fined 10xs the amount in damages that they would have claimed and forced to pay that to to several different non-profit charities.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      hegemon13, 17 Mar 2009 @ 5:49am

      Re: Obvious

      There is. It's called a "frivolous lawsuit." Clearly, this was, but it may not have been declared on by the judge. I think, in this case, the plaintiff party (not Disney, actually) should have to pay all legal fees with interest, plus reimburse the defendant for their time, and pay for any damages. Damages, for an individual, could be time missed from work or business, lost employment, etc. Not sure if it would apply to a corporation. These kinds of bully lawsuits need to be checked. Hard.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Mar 2009 @ 5:20am

    Boy, if Disney was mad about that I sure hope they didn't watch "South Park" last week.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Liam, 17 Mar 2009 @ 5:39am

    blah

    you guys need to keep up, it's already been stated that disney do not own the song, therefore they did not sue, the owner of the song did.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 17 Mar 2009 @ 5:53am

    Hysterical

    As a jewish person, I have to say that this is one of the funniest of the Family Guys ever. I almost crapped my pants when I heard this song. For those of us with no sense of humor, GROW UP!

    This was parody at its best! Thank you Family Guy for again going where others (except South Park) are too chicken feces to go!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Lucretious, 17 Mar 2009 @ 6:07am

    Seth McFarland = Win.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gene Cavanaugh, 18 Mar 2009 @ 12:10pm

    Pinnochio song

    Right on, Michael, though IMO, the real problem is the ridiculous times allowed for copyright (though you can sort of understand; politicians depend on campaign funds, and therefore have to sell their souls to big business or get out of politics).
    If we had campaign finance reform, I'll bet one change would be shortening the length of time for a copyright; say, to 10 - 20 years; and there goes the copyright involved!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.