by Mike Masnick
Tue, Sep 2nd 2008 2:03pm
We've talked about the concept of a reverse Streisand Effect, where a company purposely pretends to be outraged and demands to take something down in order to generate more attention for it, and now there's some evidence suggesting that last week's DMCA takedown notices for the "fake" Mad Men Twitter accounts may have been part of AMC's own marketing strategy. Buried at the bottom of a NY Times article about what happened, there's a hint that the whole thing was planned out, as following a request from the Times reporter, Brian Stelter, to one of the "fake" users for an interview, that character "referred all questions to Deep Focus, a Web marketing agency that works for AMC."
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- YouTube Puts Some Monetary Weight Behind Fighting For Fair Use: Others Should Too
- MPAA Whacs A Few More Moles, Declares Premature Victory While Making Movie Fans Worse Off
- The Orwellian Story About CafePress Takedowns By Orwell's Estate... Was Really CafePress Screwing Up
- Stop Freaking Out About Snapchat's Terms Of Service; You Read It Wrong
- Just About Everything About Twitter Suspending Deadspin And SBNation Accounts Is Ridiculous