by Mike Masnick
Tue, Sep 2nd 2008 2:03pm
We've talked about the concept of a reverse Streisand Effect, where a company purposely pretends to be outraged and demands to take something down in order to generate more attention for it, and now there's some evidence suggesting that last week's DMCA takedown notices for the "fake" Mad Men Twitter accounts may have been part of AMC's own marketing strategy. Buried at the bottom of a NY Times article about what happened, there's a hint that the whole thing was planned out, as following a request from the Times reporter, Brian Stelter, to one of the "fake" users for an interview, that character "referred all questions to Deep Focus, a Web marketing agency that works for AMC."
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Twitter Reports On Government Agencies Using 'Report Tweet' Function To Block Terrorism-Related Content
- Man Actually Arrested For Assault With A Deadly Tweet
- Actor James Woods Now On The Receiving End Of Questionable Twitter Defamation Claim
- Mormon Church Tries To Censor MormonLeaks Using Copyright, Streisand Effect Takes Over
- Google Report: 99.95 Percent Of DMCA Takedown Notices Are Bot-Generated Bullshit Buckshot