by Mike Masnick
Tue, Sep 2nd 2008 2:03pm
We've talked about the concept of a reverse Streisand Effect, where a company purposely pretends to be outraged and demands to take something down in order to generate more attention for it, and now there's some evidence suggesting that last week's DMCA takedown notices for the "fake" Mad Men Twitter accounts may have been part of AMC's own marketing strategy. Buried at the bottom of a NY Times article about what happened, there's a hint that the whole thing was planned out, as following a request from the Times reporter, Brian Stelter, to one of the "fake" users for an interview, that character "referred all questions to Deep Focus, a Web marketing agency that works for AMC."
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- One Direction Offers Remix Competition, Then Sony/Soundcloud Punish The Entrants As Copyright Infringers
- Protocols Instead Of Platforms: Rethinking Reddit, Twitter, Moderation And Free Speech
- Canadian Court Ponders If A Disagreement On Twitter Constitutes Criminal Harassment
- Dancing Babies, The DMCA, Fair Use And Whether Companies Should Pay For Bogus Takedowns
- MLB Network DMCAs Video Of Bob Costas Torching MLB Pitcher, Which We'll Now Discuss At Length