by Mike Masnick
Tue, Sep 2nd 2008 2:03pm
We've talked about the concept of a reverse Streisand Effect, where a company purposely pretends to be outraged and demands to take something down in order to generate more attention for it, and now there's some evidence suggesting that last week's DMCA takedown notices for the "fake" Mad Men Twitter accounts may have been part of AMC's own marketing strategy. Buried at the bottom of a NY Times article about what happened, there's a hint that the whole thing was planned out, as following a request from the Times reporter, Brian Stelter, to one of the "fake" users for an interview, that character "referred all questions to Deep Focus, a Web marketing agency that works for AMC."
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Italy Proposes Law To Make Mocking People Online Illegal
- Former UMG Exec: Major Label Music Should Cost More And DMCA Safe Harbors Should Be Destroyed
- Senator John McCain Uses Cybersecurity Hearing To Try To Shame Twitter For Not Selling Data To The CIA
- Another Day, Another Anomaly: Paramount Issues DMCA Takedown On Ubuntu Linux Torrent
- Twitter Suspends YouTube Phenom PewDiePie For Making A Stupid ISIS Joke