by Mike Masnick
Thu, Feb 28th 2008 6:36am
It's amazing how short-sighted some people can be on the immigration question. Rep. Zoe Lofgren has a wonderful idea, suggesting that we make it much easier for skilled foreign workers to establish residency if they get a job in the US. It's difficult to see why anyone would oppose this. Keeping those workers in the US, working for US companies, means that they're contributing to the American economy. Sending them home only lets them compete against us, potentially harming the American economy. The argument most often brought up against such proposals, that it hurts American jobs, is easily shown to be false. It's based on the incorrect assumption that jobs are a zero-sum game, and if a foreign-born worker takes a job, it means one fewer job for an American-born worker. Yet, if that foreign worker goes back to his home country and works for a company that takes down an American company, then we have a lot fewer jobs in the US, due to that worker going home. At the same time, if that foreign-born worker stays here, and while working for an American company, helps build up an industry, it will create many new jobs for both foreign and American-born workers.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Outgoing FCC Boss Warns New FCC About The Perils Of Killing Net Neutrality
- Getty's French Office Sends Out Letters To US Websites Demanding They Take Down Anything Linking It To 'Legalized Extortion'
- Our Unfortunate Annual Tradition: A Look At What Should Have Entered The Public Domain, But Didn't
- YouTuber Jailed In Singapore For Criticizing The Government Seeks Asylum In The US
- Google's Larry Page Got Bored Of Disrupting The Telecom Sector With Google Fiber